Enterprise Leadership

200912 Enterprise Leadership
Individual Written Assignment
(Grade worth: 30%)
Purpose;
This assessment task provides students with a written exercise to assist in” rel=”nofollow”>in developin” rel=”nofollow”>ing their critical thin” rel=”nofollow”>inkin” rel=”nofollow”>ing and understandin” rel=”nofollow”>ing of some important management issues. It encourages students to research the topics, and to critically analyse and reflect on the issues presented in” rel=”nofollow”>in the materials provided. This in” rel=”nofollow”>information is then to be written up as a Busin” rel=”nofollow”>iness Report addressin” rel=”nofollow”>ing the questions raised.
? Note: This assessment assures Course Learnin” rel=”nofollow”>ing Objectives 1 and 5 as listed below.
Course learnin” rel=”nofollow”>ing outcomes
1 and 5 CLO 1: Communicate effectively usin” rel=”nofollow”>ing disciplin” rel=”nofollow”>ine-appropriate literacy and verbal skills that are suited to audience and context.
CLO 5: Identify disciplin” rel=”nofollow”>ine-appropriate cultural issues and make recommendations for Busin” rel=”nofollow”>iness practice.
Assessment Details:

You must use the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing Essential References and cite all of the references A-D.

A. View and analyse the YouTube clip https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku6SAMsyHbo
B. Download, read and analyse the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing articles:
Banerjee, S.B. 2011, Embeddin” rel=”nofollow”>ing Sustain” rel=”nofollow”>inability Across the Organization: A Critical Perspective, Academy of Management Learnin” rel=”nofollow”>ing and Education, vol. 10, no. 4, pp.719-731.
Haugh H.M. and Talwar A. 2010, How do Corporations Embed Sustain” rel=”nofollow”>inability Across the Organization?, Academy of Management Learnin” rel=”nofollow”>ing and Education, vol. 9, no. 3, pp.384-396.
Mahapatra, P.S. 2013, CSR in” rel=”nofollow”>in TCS – A Case Study, Parikalpana – KIIT Journal of Management, vol. 9, iss. 2, pp.76-81.
Thite, M. 2013, Interview with Ratan Tata, Chairman Emeritus Tata Group, Global Busin” rel=”nofollow”>iness Review, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 549-552.
C. Read, analyse and apply theoretical aspects in” rel=”nofollow”>in Chapter 5 – Social responsibility and managerial ethics (pp154-194) in” rel=”nofollow”>in Robbin” rel=”nofollow”>ins, S, Bergman, R, Stagg, I & Coulter M 2015, Management 7, 7th edn, Pearson Australia, Sydney.
D. Consider the significance of the “The Man Who Saw Tomorrow” quote to your work and how it applies to theory.

Your report needs to:
1. Research, Analyse, Synthesise and then Report on the Tata approach to Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustain” rel=”nofollow”>inability.
2. Discuss approaches to managin” rel=”nofollow”>ing culture and diversity of employment practices in” rel=”nofollow”>in Tata companies.
3. Conclude by identifyin” rel=”nofollow”>ing 3 specific ideas that you might consider implementin” rel=”nofollow”>ing in” rel=”nofollow”>in your future as a manager.

Report format:
Table of Contents
Executive Summary (150 words in” rel=”nofollow”>included in” rel=”nofollow”>in word count)
Introduction
Body of the Report divided in” rel=”nofollow”>into the Tata approach to:
– Corporate Social Responsibility
– Sustain” rel=”nofollow”>inability
-Approaches to managin” rel=”nofollow”>ing culture and diversity of employment practices
Conclusion
-Identification of 3 specific ideas that you might consider implementin” rel=”nofollow”>ing in” rel=”nofollow”>in your future as a manager.

Reference List
Appendix/Appendices

For more in” rel=”nofollow”>information on formattin” rel=”nofollow”>ing citations and reference entries go to ‘Referencin” rel=”nofollow”>ing & Citation’ on the WSU Library Website. http://library.UWS.edu.au/UWS_library/guides/referencin” rel=”nofollow”>ing-citation.

The report should be well-formatted. The language used should be formal rather than in” rel=”nofollow”>informal and should be both clear and grammatically sound. Your written text should not in” rel=”nofollow”>include any spellin” rel=”nofollow”>ing errors. Avoid usin” rel=”nofollow”>ing first person and write the report as if it was meant to be presented to a supervisor who was judgin” rel=”nofollow”>ing your ability to understand and summarise the main” rel=”nofollow”>in concepts and issues raised in” rel=”nofollow”>in the essential references and from your studies in” rel=”nofollow”>in Enterprise Leadership. ANALYSIS and SYNTHESIS are expected not DESCRIPTION.

Written Presentation of the Report

1. You must in” rel=”nofollow”>insert a FOOTER with your full name (Last, First) and SID. (Go to Insert in” rel=”nofollow”>in Microsoft Word and select Footer and then Edit Footer. Type in” rel=”nofollow”>in your Last, First Name and SID and select Close Header and Footer)
2. Only WORD DOCS will be accepted and marked.
3. The font to be used for this assignment is either Arial or Times New Roman script, 12 poin” rel=”nofollow”>int font size, 1.5 lin” rel=”nofollow”>ine spacin” rel=”nofollow”>ing, and left justified.

Length

1500 words (+/- 150 words).
References are not in” rel=”nofollow”>included as part of the word count.
Limit direct quotations to:
1. Defin” rel=”nofollow”>initions
2. A specific quote used to expand on a poin” rel=”nofollow”>int you have already made.
3. No more than 100 words in” rel=”nofollow”>in aggregate – rather paraphrase and use multiple references of what is discussed in” rel=”nofollow”>in your sources.
You can only achieve a high standard by writin” rel=”nofollow”>ing drafts and editin” rel=”nofollow”>ing – do not attempt to write this the night before it is due – you will not be able to check the Similarity in” rel=”nofollow”>index if you do this.

Submission details, Due Date and Turnitin” rel=”nofollow”>in

Your assignment must be submitted onlin” rel=”nofollow”>ine usin” rel=”nofollow”>ing this assignment template through the relevant Turnitin” rel=”nofollow”>in assignment drop box, in” rel=”nofollow”>in the Enterprise Leadership vUWS site, on or before 11:45pm Sunday, October 9, 2016). Assignments submitted after this time may be subject to a late penalty if no special consideration form has been completed and approved. Under no circumstances will any WSU staff accept hard copy or email submissions. RETAIN a copy of the TURNITIN receipt – without this evidence you will get a zero in” rel=”nofollow”>in case of any problems.

The Turnitin” rel=”nofollow”>in drop box in” rel=”nofollow”>in the Enterprise Leadership vUWS site should be used for text matchin” rel=”nofollow”>ing and assignment submission. Usin” rel=”nofollow”>ing the Turnitin” rel=”nofollow”>in drop box for text matchin” rel=”nofollow”>ing means that you wish to generate and in” rel=”nofollow”>inspect a Turnitin” rel=”nofollow”>in origin” rel=”nofollow”>inality report which highlights pieces of text for which Turnitin” rel=”nofollow”>in has found a match. Where proper acknowledgement is in” rel=”nofollow”>in place you will not need to do anythin” rel=”nofollow”>ing; where proper acknowledgement is not in” rel=”nofollow”>in place you will need to make changes to your assignment. If you have made changes to your assignment you can re-submit it to Turnitin” rel=”nofollow”>in which will over-write the existin” rel=”nofollow”>ing version of your assignment as well as generate another Turnitin” rel=”nofollow”>in origin” rel=”nofollow”>inality report (note that there is a delay of up to 24+ hours in” rel=”nofollow”>in gettin” rel=”nofollow”>ing an origin” rel=”nofollow”>inality report for this second or any subsequent submission of your assignment).
As soon as you are happy that no further changes are necessary to your assignment you will then need to submit the fin” rel=”nofollow”>inal version of your assignment to the Turnitin” rel=”nofollow”>in assignment drop box.
Markin” rel=”nofollow”>ing criteria and standards
CRITERIA FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH DISTINCTION
Understands Management Dynamics topics and concepts. Able to research further in” rel=”nofollow”>into topics and concepts
(20%) Little understandin” rel=”nofollow”>ing of Management Dynamics topics and concepts. Misin” rel=”nofollow”>interprets in” rel=”nofollow”>information. Almost no evidence of research beyond text and readin” rel=”nofollow”>ings. A basic understandin” rel=”nofollow”>ing of Management Dynamics topics and concepts. Little evidence of research beyond text and readin” rel=”nofollow”>ings. A comprehensive understandin” rel=”nofollow”>ing of Management Dynamics topics and concepts. Evidence of some good additional research lin” rel=”nofollow”>inked to argument. A very good understandin” rel=”nofollow”>ing of Management Dynamics topics and concepts. Evidence of well targeted additional research which helps with development of argument. An outstandin” rel=”nofollow”>ing understandin” rel=”nofollow”>ing of Management Dynamics topics and concepts. Evidence of excellent additional research relevant to argument.
0-9.9 10.0-12.9 13.0-14.9 15.0-16.9 17.0-20.0
Developed an effective response to the assessment questions
(25%) Did not make a real attempt to answer the assessment questions. Made a limited attempt to answer some of the assessment questions. Made a good attempt but only answered some of the assessment questions. Made a very good attempt and answered most of the assessment questions. Made an excellent attempt which answered all of the assessment questions.
0-12.4 12.5-16.24 16.25-18.74 18.75-21.24 21.25-25.0
Able to demonstrate in” rel=”nofollow”>independent critical analysis skills
(15%) Regurgitates in” rel=”nofollow”>information from lectures and readin” rel=”nofollow”>ings. Little evidence of critical thin” rel=”nofollow”>inkin” rel=”nofollow”>ing or analysis. A satisfactory level of critical thin” rel=”nofollow”>inkin” rel=”nofollow”>ing or analysis with a tendency to describe. A good level of critical thin” rel=”nofollow”>inkin” rel=”nofollow”>ing or analysis. Insightful and critical reflections start to emerge. A very good level of critical thin” rel=”nofollow”>inkin” rel=”nofollow”>ing or analysis. Insightful and critical reflections are evident. An excellent level of critical thin” rel=”nofollow”>inkin” rel=”nofollow”>ing or analysis. Insightful and critical reflections are evident. Synthesises concepts and abstract ideas.
0-7.4 7.5-9.74 9.75-11.24 11.25-12.74 12.75-15.0
Able to construct a coherent and logical discussion
(20%) Disjoin” rel=”nofollow”>inted, unfocused, poorly structured argument. Disconnected, fragmented paragraphs; no clear lin” rel=”nofollow”>ine of argument. Evidence of a basic lin” rel=”nofollow”>ine of argument; improvement needed to create coherent argument. Organization of ideas relatively clear, but some work still needed to take argument to a higher level. Able to construct a coherent lin” rel=”nofollow”>ine of argument right through the assessment. Evidence of flow. Able to construct a coherent lin” rel=”nofollow”>ine of argument right through the assessment, and to effectively synthesise and in” rel=”nofollow”>integrate ideas.
0-9.9 10.0-12.9 13.0-14.9 15.0-16.9 17.0-20.0
Able to use sound grammar and spellin” rel=”nofollow”>ing
(10%) Poor expression due to poor grammar and/or in” rel=”nofollow”>incorrect punctuation. Unacceptable number of spellin” rel=”nofollow”>ing errors. Some grammatical discrepancies; few punctuation and spellin” rel=”nofollow”>ing errors. Relatively good grammar and punctuation. No punctuation and spellin” rel=”nofollow”>ing errors. Sound grammar, punctuation and spellin” rel=”nofollow”>ing. Good writin” rel=”nofollow”>ing style. Outstandin” rel=”nofollow”>ing use of grammar, punctuation and spellin” rel=”nofollow”>ing. An elegant writin” rel=”nofollow”>ing style. A great joy to read!
0-4.9 5.0-6.4 6.5-7.4 7.5-8.4 8.5-10.0
Made appropriate acknowledge-ments to in” rel=”nofollow”>information sources used
(10%) Most ideas from in” rel=”nofollow”>information sources have not been acknowledged.
Referencin” rel=”nofollow”>ing in” rel=”nofollow”>in text and in” rel=”nofollow”>in list in” rel=”nofollow”>inadequate Attempted Harvard referencin” rel=”nofollow”>ing but displays poor grasp of academic convention.
Some in” rel=”nofollow”>inconsistencies in” rel=”nofollow”>in Harvard referencin” rel=”nofollow”>ing with in” rel=”nofollow”>in-text citations and/or references. All of the ideas from in” rel=”nofollow”>information sources have been acknowledged in” rel=”nofollow”>in text and in” rel=”nofollow”>in list. All of the ideas from in” rel=”nofollow”>information sources have been acknowledged; a high level of understandin” rel=”nofollow”>ing of the Harvard system. An excellent level of comprehensive referencin” rel=”nofollow”>ing throughout the assessment. Reference list is complete and without any errors.
0-4.9 5.0-6.4 6.5-7.4 7.5-8.4 8.5-10.0

find the cost of your paper