a primary medical care
Unfortunately, the feedback of our proposal in order no. 81780851 was not the best even if more than one university in the US and UK mention that the proposal itself is excellent BUT the idea of PhD must be more specific and not broad, which should be well known for you as a professional writer. I will attach a new file entitled “Proposal Feedback” that contains the comments on our proposal. Some of the comment are: (THE LATEST COMMENT WILL BE SENT AS AN ATTACHMENT AS I’VE MENTIONED)
1- Thank you for sending your proposal. The topic isn’t one that I know much about (I’m a primary medical care researcher, but focused on prescribing and multimorbidity rather than prevention or obesity), but we have a colleague here whose main interest is obesity and developing interventions to reduce it and I’ve suggested to Prof Abboud that she would be a more appropriate person to have a discussion with.
One question would be how fixed the topic is?
In that regard, funders vary to the extent that they expect you to stick to your initial proposal, so it would be useful to understand how flexible your funder is. The main issue is that what you are proposing is quite broad and large in scope, whereas successful PhDs are typically more focused and narrower than students initially think they will be.
2- Thank you for your interest in doing a PhD with us. Before we can make a decision about this, we need to decide whether we are an appropriate place for you to do the work, which means exploring the fit between your research interests and ours, and whether we have the necessary knowledge and skills to supervise you. It’s very important from your perspective that you get the right supervisory team for you, but it’s also important from our perspective that your PhD is reasonably aligned with the work we already do.
NOW, please dear new writer understand my situation and that I lost the chance to start my PhD in last April because of these comments that must be corrected to have our proposal accepted. In addition to the comments I offered up, please read the comment in the attached and check the link they provided along with the mentioned attached entitled Proposal Feedback. BEFORE THAT, please read the instructions of the other order I’ve mentioned to know that I do need an idea in Public Health that must be connected to Saudi Arabia, but to keep in mind please the feedback I offered here from different universities and in the attached.
Please remember that I do need the idea of my proposal of my PhD to be applicable in Saudi Arabia but not to be very broad but more specific, as you can see in the two comments here and the other comment in the attached.
Two questions, please:
– How much time do you need to send me the new proposal based on the comments to adjust the deadline of this revision for you with the support team?
Could you please tell me briefly what your plan of work on the proposal is?
*NOTE1: please make sure that the new idea will be having enough resources to be expanded to a PhD project with a very long list of reliable resources, but to follow the feedback of the professors and keep the questionnaires existent in the new edited idea.
NOTE2: in regards to the number of references, use what you feel good or about the same of the first proposal. Keep in mind that the previous order has both the proposal and its outline.
NOTE3: I will attach the previous proposal as an attachment entitled “Proposal 1” for your reference.
NOTE4: It is must please to go over the previous idea in order no. 81780851 along with the feedback from the university found here and in the attachment to do the edited proposal and remember please that it is the one for my PhD as one of the requirements of acceptance.