Decision making

Order Description

Describe to the reader the key poin” rel=”nofollow”>ints of the collaborative care decision to be analysed. This section should not be overly long, but it must clarify key parts of the decision in” rel=”nofollow”>in preparation for the
analysis that follows.

Mr Jones a 79yrs old gentle man with a past medical history of vascular dementia, prostate cancer and Parkin” rel=”nofollow”>inson’s disease. Mr Jones was in” rel=”nofollow”>in our care for 6weeks at a local hospital. The decision to
in” rel=”nofollow”>insert a catheter and put in” rel=”nofollow”>in place a DNAR by the healthcare professionals lookin” rel=”nofollow”>ing after Mr Jones was not welcomed by the family as they felt in” rel=”nofollow”>insertin” rel=”nofollow”>ing a catheter would reduce time healthcare
professional spend lookin” rel=”nofollow”>ing after him and also if a DNAR was put in” rel=”nofollow”>in place their father will not have best care, but this essay will focus on the in” rel=”nofollow”>indwellin” rel=”nofollow”>ing catheter….. here you look at literatures
on in” rel=”nofollow”>indwellin” rel=”nofollow”>ing catheter, UTI, pressure ulcers, why this was done in” rel=”nofollow”>in patient best in” rel=”nofollow”>interest
The decision makin” rel=”nofollow”>ing process
Usin” rel=”nofollow”>ing appropriate decision makin” rel=”nofollow”>ing model critically analyse the decision makin” rel=”nofollow”>ing process as it occurred within” rel=”nofollow”>in the collaborative care decision. This section must be supported with appropriate theory
and literature.

The MDT lookin” rel=”nofollow”>ing after Mr Jones used the seven steps model of effective decision makin” rel=”nofollow”>ing while dealin” rel=”nofollow”>ing with him, why was the seven steps decision makin” rel=”nofollow”>ing process used? Write about the advantages and
disadvantages, usin” rel=”nofollow”>ing 2 different literature defin” rel=”nofollow”>ine the 7steps decision makin” rel=”nofollow”>ing process, say how it was applied what was good about it ? what was not so good about it ? did it help the situation?
Compare with another model, what was the reason it did?. Why was it Ethical for the decision made?. Look at literature about in” rel=”nofollow”>incontin” rel=”nofollow”>inent and sacrum ulcers, UTI in” rel=”nofollow”>in older people, be very explicit as
to what poin” rel=”nofollow”>int the different model was used in” rel=”nofollow”>in the treatment process support with literature and evidence based practices.

Team workin” rel=”nofollow”>ing and leadership
Critically analyse the management of issues within” rel=”nofollow”>in the scenario, usin” rel=”nofollow”>ing appropriate team workin” rel=”nofollow”>ing and leadership theory and literature.

The MDT in” rel=”nofollow”>involved in” rel=”nofollow”>in Mr. Jones care in” rel=”nofollow”>includes . The nutrition nurse, the speech and language therapist, the tissue viability nurse, the consultant, the social worker, the dementia specialist team and
the ward nurses and doctors. In this section we lookin” rel=”nofollow”>ing at team work and leadership styles and what one was used in” rel=”nofollow”>in Mr Loo case (transformational leadership ) why was it best leadership style? Use
literature to support this, what was the outcome for the patient? Compare another leadership style and say why it wont have worked ie autocratic or transactional.
Legal, ethical and professional issuess
You must use at least one of these concepts most relevant to the decision. Your choice should be reflected in” rel=”nofollow”>in your in” rel=”nofollow”>introduction. Once you have decided which of the three concepts are relevant,
critically analyse the scenario usin” rel=”nofollow”>ing appropriate theory, literature and professional guidelin” rel=”nofollow”>ines, where relevant.
The ethical, legal and professional issues relatin” rel=”nofollow”>ing to the above scenario will be discussed and critically analysed, the mental capacity acts 2005, NMC code, right to life, duty of care,
prioritisin” rel=”nofollow”>ing care, evidence based practice, beneficent, and medical paternalism and the four quadrant approach will be considered… this will be elaborated and analysed critically based on the
scenario of Mr Jones

Draw your analysis together and give a balanced view on the strengths and areas for improvement of the decision makin” rel=”nofollow”>ing process analysed above. Also, draw out the most important elements of care
improvement in” rel=”nofollow”>in relation to team workin” rel=”nofollow”>ing and leadership. Fin” rel=”nofollow”>inish by identifyin” rel=”nofollow”>ing, in” rel=”nofollow”>in the fin” rel=”nofollow”>inal paragraph, key learnin” rel=”nofollow”>ing poin” rel=”nofollow”>ints from this process. This should be worded to reflect how your future
practice will be in” rel=”nofollow”>influenced by the analysis given above.
This section will be reflectin” rel=”nofollow”>ing on what was learnt from the scenario lookin” rel=”nofollow”>ing after Mr Jones and also how different policies and assessment can affect decision makin” rel=”nofollow”>ing in” rel=”nofollow”>in nursin” rel=”nofollow”>ing, the care of Mr
Jones and the importance of collaborative decision makin” rel=”nofollow”>ing and also the importance of gettin” rel=”nofollow”>ing updated in” rel=”nofollow”>in the ethical legal and professional decision makin” rel=”nofollow”>ing process in” rel=”nofollow”>in nursin” rel=”nofollow”>ing. All these will be well

find the cost of your paper