Case brief of AntiTrust” and Separation of Powers

Order Description
Case 1 Brief “AntiTrust”

1) Watch the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing video on how to brief a case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhKOv0VQENY.
2) Read the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing articles on how to brief a case: http://www.lawnerds.com/guide/briefin” rel=”nofollow”>ing.html;
http://www.cengage.com/resource_uploads/downloads/0324595743_156000.pdf.
3) Conduct research (ideally Google Scholar) to locate the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing case listed below to fin” rel=”nofollow”>ind out more in” rel=”nofollow”>information in” rel=”nofollow”>in order to complete the required brief memo in” rel=”nofollow”>in step four.
• Week 2 Case “Antitrust” Brief: Antitrust: Abbott Laboratories v. Portland Retail Druggists Association, In425 US 1
4) Write the brief memo in” rel=”nofollow”>in your own words and in” rel=”nofollow”>include answers to the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing in” rel=”nofollow”>in the order presented:
• The complete title and citation for the case.
• Explain” rel=”nofollow”>in which court decided this case.
• How did the case get to the court? Discuss the procedural history of the case.
• Discuss the facts of the case.
• What legal issues were decided by the court in” rel=”nofollow”>in this case? Give its holdin” rel=”nofollow”>ing (decision) and the reasons it gave for the decision (reasonin” rel=”nofollow”>ing)?
• Was the decision unanimous? If not, who dissented and why did they dissent?
• Why is this case important for healthcare admin” rel=”nofollow”>inistrators?

Case 2 Brief “Separation of Powers”
1) Watch the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing video on how to brief a case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhKOv0VQENY.
2) Read the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing articles on how to brief a case: http://www.lawnerds.com/guide/briefin” rel=”nofollow”>ing.html;
http://www.cengage.com/resource_uploads/downloads/0324595743_156000.pdf.
3) Conduct research (ideally Google Scholar) to locate the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing case listed below to fin” rel=”nofollow”>ind out more in” rel=”nofollow”>information in” rel=”nofollow”>in order to complete the required brief memo in” rel=”nofollow”>in step four.
• Week 5 Case “Separation of Powers” Brief: Separation of Powers: Bush v Schiavo, 885 So. 2d 321 (2004)
4) Write the brief memo in” rel=”nofollow”>in your own words and in” rel=”nofollow”>include answers to the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing in” rel=”nofollow”>in the order presented:
• The complete title and citation for the case.
• Explain” rel=”nofollow”>in which court decided this case.
• How did the case get to the court? Discuss the procedural history of the case.
• What legal issues were decided by the in” rel=”nofollow”>in this case?
• Discuss the facts of the case.
• What did the court decide? Give its holdin” rel=”nofollow”>ing (decision) and the reasons it gave for the decision (reasonin” rel=”nofollow”>ing)?
• Was the decision unanimous? If not, who dissented and why did they dissent?
• Why is this case important for healthcare admin” rel=”nofollow”>inistrators?

Case 3 Brief “Professional Liability” (2 pages, 2 references)
1) Watch the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing video on how to brief a case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhKOv0VQENY.
2) Read the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing articles on how to brief a case: http://www.lawnerds.com/guide/briefin” rel=”nofollow”>ing.html;
http://www.cengage.com/resource_uploads/downloads/0324595743_156000.pdf.
3) Conduct research (ideally Google Scholar) to locate the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing case listed below to fin” rel=”nofollow”>ind out more in” rel=”nofollow”>information in” rel=”nofollow”>in order to complete the required brief memo in” rel=”nofollow”>in step four.
• Week 8 Case “Professional Liability” Brief: Professional Liability: Montague v. AMN Healthcare, Inc., 223 Cal. App. 4th
4) Write the brief memo in” rel=”nofollow”>in your own words and in” rel=”nofollow”>include answers to the followin” rel=”nofollow”>ing in” rel=”nofollow”>in the order presented:
• The complete title and citation for the case.
• Explain” rel=”nofollow”>in which court decided this case.
• How did the case get to the court? Discuss the procedural history of the case.
• What legal issues were decided by the in” rel=”nofollow”>in this case?
• Discuss the facts of the case.
• What did the court decide? Give its holdin” rel=”nofollow”>ing (decision) and the reasons it gave for the decision (reasonin” rel=”nofollow”>ing)?
• Was the decision unanimous? If not, who dissented and why did they dissent?
• Why is this case important for healthcare admin” rel=”nofollow”>inistrators?

find the cost of your paper