Weeklong content analysis of national or local media focusing on portrayals of race and gender
Complete a weeklong content analysis of national or local media, taking into account portrayals of race and gender. You should use research methods of quantitative
and/or quantitative analysis and present your findings in a professional manner with original charts, graphs, citations and conclusions backed up by research and
facts, NOT opinion. Be sure to note what is significant about your findings and point out both positive and negative implications.
This course teaches students how to use established research methods to study patterns of media portrayals of gender, race, class, disability and sexuality. Students
also learn the history of these patterns and ways they become interwoven in media structures, then indoctrinated to journalists and other media workers.
Company Law Assignment 229 Downloads | 13 Pages 3,003 Words | Published Date: 28/01/2015 Presentation The control and appropriate activity of any organization or partnership is totally reliant on the nature and way in which the chiefs and other office bearers of the organization play out their capacities. This is along these lines, on the grounds that despite the fact that an organization has a different lawful element and it has its free presence unmistakable from its individuals, by the by the organization works through its executives and office bearers and accordingly it is critical that they play out their undertakings and obligations perseveringly and genuinely being consistent with the arrangements of Corporations Law and also their obligations set up under the Common Law and General Law all things considered. The present talk conces a discourse of different obligations revered upon Directors and other office bearers of the organization under General Law and in addition the arrangements of the Corporations Act, 2001. With the end goal of this talk, the nature of the post of executives and office bearers of an organization in Australia has been examined keeping in mind the end goal to pick up an understanding about the obligations that they ought to be and which they are liable to. It is submitted in such manner that two point of interest cases, to be specific ASIC v Rich (2003) 44 ACSR 6821 and ASIC v MacDonald (No 11) (2009) NSWSC2872 are appropriate to be noted as in these cases, extremely solid judgements have been passed with reference to the obligations of executives and office bearers of the enterprise. In these two cases, different features of the obligations that are endowed upon the executives and office bearers of a partnership have been examined. It is additionally presented that keeping in mind the end goal to learn the obligations that are endowed upon the chiefs and office bearers of the enterprise, different academic jouals have been alluded to so as to give this exchange certain profundity. The two historic point cases named above have been talked about in a word so as to find out different issues required with the tasks of the organization. Nature of the post of office carrier and executive of a partnership Segment 9 of the Corporations Act, 20013 characterizes the term officer and executive of the organization. It is submitted in such manner, that the definition gave by segment 9 of the Corporations Act, 2001 does not accommodate the obligations of the chiefs or office bearers of an organization and just alludes to the arrangement of the gatherings to the post of executive or alteative executive or to the post of officer. However as submitted before, it is being emphasized that an organization works through its officers thusly and they are the ones who attempt to play out every one of the assignments that must be performed by the organization in administration of its undertakings and all things considered all the statutory duties of an enterprise must be performed by the chiefs and office bearers of the organization. It is submitted in such manner, that the chief of an organization remains in trustee limit towards the organization and its partners. Since chiefs of an organization are endowed with execution of critical capacities including taking vital money related choices for the benefit of the organization and accordingly it is vital that all executives and officers of the organization demonstration to the greatest advantage of the organization. Obligations of Director of a company under General Law For the most part it is watched that substances made under the arrangements of a statute are goveed by the arrangements of the specific law all things considered and in such manner it is presented that since chiefs and officers of an organization demonstration in guardian limit towards the partnership and its partners they are endowed with specific obligations under General Law too under the Law of Equity as the Commonwealth of Australia is a Common Law Country, the officers of the organization are depended with specific obligations under General Law also and the same have been talked about quickly hereunder: General obligations. Aside from the statutory obligations forced by the arrangements of the Corporations Act, 2001 under Common Law, the chiefs and office bearers of an enterprise might be liable to inconvenience of common punishments on the off chance that they neglect to play out their obligations such as:Exercise their forces and play out their commitments with judiciousness, due care and alert with the proportionate aptitudes that they have to exercise and which they declare to hold as office bearers of the organization and the standard of care5 would be that of any sensible individual in a similar given circumstance. The different parameters on which the activities of chiefs and office bearers of the organization are tried are as follows:Whether the choice taken by the executive or office carrier has been taken in accordance with some basic honesty or not; Whether the chief or the workplace conveyor has or does not have any individual material enthusiasm for the topic of the choice gone up against sake of the organization; Whether the executive or the workplace carrier has made an educated judgment or the choice has been made rashly; and Whether the executive or the workplace conveyor has acted under a bonafide conviction that the judgment made by him is to the greatest advantage of the partnership and different partners of the organization. The executives and office bearers of the organization are committed to mage and play out the undertaking of leading the exchange or business of the organization to the greatest advantage of the organization and its partners. This prerequisite isn’t a fundamentally unrelated necessity however the chief and office conveyor of the organization are committed to take the encompassing conditions of the organization, for example, the sort of organization, its size, the administrative commitments and so forth in thought. The executive and office bearers of an enterprise are obliged to find a way to guarantee that they are put in a situation to screen the administration of the organization and have a general comprehension of the business and the dynamic monetary conditions and their impact on the organization. Prerequisite to act in accordance with some basic honesty towards the organization and its partners is a standout amongst the most essential obligations forced on the chief or office conveyor of an organization and this obligation is both a customary law obligation and in addition one revered under area 180-184 of the Corporations Act, 2001. Executives and office bearers of an organization must be of contention keeping away from nature and maintain a strategic distance from irreconcilable circumstance with that of the organization’s ;>