The post contains two asighnments
Review “Struggles in the Fields” and the research done by Offen (Module 1), Malone (Module 1), and Kang.
In 800 to 1,200 words, indicate how you, as an executive of either a non-profit advocating for undocumented workers or an executive of an agricultural conglomerate, would use Offen’s criteria or Kang’s actor-network theory (ANT) to either develop or respond to demands made by undocumented workers for worker’s compensation.
Use qualitative and quantitative research as part of a community-based participatory research evaluation of your efforts.include a diagram of your design using the style defined in the Research Designs document, and an identification of the strength of the research based on the Hierarchy of Evidence from the Research Questions document (Module 1).
3. Analyze quantitative and qualitative data using biostatistics, informatics, computer-based programming and software, as appropriate.
11. Select methods to evaluate public health programs.
12. Discuss multiple dimensions of the policy-making process, including the roles of ethics and evidence.
14. Advocate for political, social, or economic policies and programs that will improve health in diverse populations.
15. Evaluate policies for their impact on public health and health equity.
1. Deconstruct how qualitative, quantitative, and community-based participatory research impact occupational health studies and provide evidence for occupational policy.
2. Integrate the hazards of agriculture and social justice into a managerial approach to the topic.
2; East European History using New York Review style
A book review of either Budweisers into Czechs and Germans: A local history of Bohemia, 1848-1914 by Jeremy King, or The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union by Terry Martin. Choose the one that you are more comfortable to write on. The book review does not need to be criticism. Please do not make summary, but focus on the issues or the unique perspective it talks about.