Prepare for inter professional stakeholders a 10–12-paragraph presentation report (not including title and reference pages) explaining how nurse leaders can use information technology to improve nursing practices that support and sustain positive patient outcomes. You do not need to actually present your assessment.
The dissemination of evidence-based practice outcomes helps nurses build stakeholder engagement and support for the use of information system and technology for health care delivery.By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Describe the importance of effective scholarship and evidence-based information to advance the profession of nursing.
Describe the basic differences between research (qualitative and quantitative) and evidence-based practice (EBP).
Describe how nurse leaders use evidence-based practice to support and sustain patient-care outcomes.
Describe how theory development and research exploration supports nursing practice changes that increase positive patient outcome.
Competency 3: Explain the use of information management tools and technologies to monitor and improve health care delivery and patient outcomes.
Identify a nursing practice that has recently changed in a specific health care setting.
Describe how nurse leaders use communication to build interprofessional stakeholder engagements.
Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is consistent with expectations of a nursing professional.
Write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Questions to Consider:
To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.
How do you manage and lead technology use?
What will the future of health care delivery look like as you contemplate technology development?
What should nurses be prepared for within the context of technology use to develop improved patient care (from a strategic standpoint)?
How do we translate new technology knowledge into patient care to develop evidence-based practice?
How do we maintain patient safety and continue to improve patient outcomes as we increase technology use in health care?
For this assessment, imagine a group of interprofessional stakeholders involved with patient care in your health care setting would like to increase positive patient outcomes. Nurse leaders have recommended changes in the practice that incorporate informatics and the application of new knowledge into your nursing practices.
You are asked to present a brief overview to a small group of student nurses. After the session has concluded, the training department would like to use your presentation as a training resource.
Select a nursing practice in your own health care setting that has changed for the better since you first began nursing.
Use the tools in your presentation software to develop a creative and engaging presentation. Include the following in your presentation:
Describe briefly an example of a nursing practice that has changed in the last two years.
Explain how theory development, research exploration, and information technology supports the changes you have described.
Describe the basic differences between research (qualitative and quantitative) and evidence-based practice (EBP).
Explain how nurse leaders use communication practices and technology to build interprofessional stakeholder engagements in support of the change you have identified.
Describe how nurse leaders use evidence-based practice to support and sustain patient-care
As I would like to think, the fundamental duty of a writer is to report the news in a honest, unprejudiced and unopinionated way. Therefore, I try to verify that my own written work holds fast to this criteria. Both the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) and the Office of Communications (Ofcom) sets of principles detail exactness as one of the real rules that writers should react to. The PCC work to authorize their set of principles in the daily paper industry and it is ‘the foundation of the arrangement of self-control to which the business has influenced a coupling duty.’ (To squeeze Complaints Commission 2009). As a rehearsing writer I feel it is essential to work in connection with these codes appropriate from the counterbalance, in order to guarantee my composition is of the most noteworthy standard all through my whole vocation. I trust this is obvious in my news coverage portfolio task. In this report I will take a gander at the significance of precise, unprejudiced news-casting and how I have connected this to my own news stories. Examining the parts and obligations of the columnist with reference to my own involvement of filling in as a writer Writers have various parts and obligations that they should consider over the span of their whole vocation; obviously this relies on the zone of news coverage with which they are included. For my report I will focus on the principle region of news-casting we have investigated so far and that is detailing the news. While announcing the news, Journalists should mull over the group of onlookers and imminent distribution, their supervisor and critically, their very own advantages (for instance, any legitimate commitments). While a few columnists may conflict with what could maybe be depicted as a moral grain, I feel that a really effective writer would dependably consider the above before submitting anything for distribution. Be that as it may, one could maybe advance the contention of open intrigue. Exact A columnist has a support of the media recommending open to ensure that the news they report is exact. This is upheld without anyone else controlling bodies and media laws, for example, criticism and slander. Different laws are set up to ensure that columnists don’t force upon court trials, for example, disdain of court. At exhibit I am learning Teeline shorthand as a major aspect of my course module: ‘Readiness for NCTJ Accreditation.’ One of the principle factors that has made detailing precisely a genuine issue for me so far has been my powerlessness to compose at a sufficiently high speed in court hearings and chamber gatherings. All that it would take is one snippet of data brought down erroneously or passed up a major opportunity through and through and the believability of a news story could be lost totally. While I don’t feel that I have made any mistakes in my work up until now, it is unquestionably an issue for me. Ideally as my Teeline aptitudes enhance, I will turn out to be more certain and start to apply it to journalistic circumstances. On my first visit to Sheffield Magistrates Court, I was sufficiently tragic to sit in on a hearing that was in the long run resolved to Crown court for trial before a jury. Lawfully, I would be not able give an account of this story until the point when condemning was finished, something our task would not allow us to do. Along these lines, I needed to search for another case to expound on that I could investigate without the dread of scorn. I endeavored to guarantee finish exactness in my stories, loaning additional care to the names and subtle elements of the general population included. While there were no genuine lawful issues with my stories as they were not proposed for distribution, it was as yet essential both for mine and the assignments purpose for them to be exact. I attempted to place myself into the attitude of an expert writer and think about their parts and duties, which I think empowered me to compose my stories as if they truly were proposed for a crowd of people. Fair-minded Further to exactness, Journalists ought to guarantee that their news composing is impartial and presents the essential realities for their crowd to decide their own particular arrangement of judgements. Any assessments ought to be as credited statements and a decent writer will demonstrate the two sides of the story. As our task involved reviewing a report of a court case, I introduced the actualities arranged by significance in the pyramid style we have been instructed and without offering any suppositions of my own. For my board story, I was managing a potential story of high human intrigue. The topic was genuinely touchy as it was with respect to the affirmation of a school conclusion in Sheffield, influencing several neighborhood kids and guardians. I composed my story utilizing the actualities and statements I had gotten from a full board meeting, a bureau meeting and significant writing from the two sides: the bureau, instruction officers, school governors and the guardians themselves. I think I prevailing with regards to composing this story from a totally nonpartisan and fair-minded point of view. Because of the delicate nature I needed to ensure that my supposition did not turn out in my written work. Regardless of whether I was for or against the conclusion was not vital for the kind of the story and my primary expectation was for the forthcoming peruser to make their own particular feeling. Objective Sheffield is a Liberal Democrat committee and all through the gathering gatherings there was some harassing from the Labor and Conservative gathering agents that were available. I think I prevailing with regards to keeping to the third obligation regarding columnists that I sketched out before by being politically unbiased in this specific piece. I think my composition here is objective and my own political influences are not straightforwardly available in any of my three news stories. Plain English To help with the clarity and openness of their news stories, Journalists ought to guarantee that their written work meets the style of their particular distribution and supervisor. Further to this, written work ought to be in plain English and without language. This is particularly vital in composing stories from court cases, chamber gatherings and police proclamations. For our task, we were to compose our three news stories in the appearance of a territorial daily paper correspondent. I read a considerable measure of territorial reporting both on the web and in print and feel that I have a decent information of the composition style, which I trust is apparent in my work. What’s more, I generally endeavor to keep up a decent level of plain English all through my journalistic written work. I feel that my court story mirrors this emphatically and peruses well. Open Interest The last region I wish to investigate is open and human premium. Over the moral duties, Journalists are urged to compose fascinating news as that is the thing that truly offers daily papers. Open intrigue is the Holy Grail for columnists and preferably all stories we compose would draw a lot of it. Open intrigue can likewise be utilized as a protection for when writers go excessively far out of their approach to get a story. For instance, if a columnist conflicts with either the PCC or the Ofcom set of accepted rules, however one might say that the story holds a lot of open intrigue, they may well escape unscathed. Be that as it may, it is anything but difficult to scrutinize the moral results of these activities. For my court and committee stories I surmise that I have caught a decent measure of open enthusiasm, as the two stories have components that make them newsworthy. I am somewhat baffled that my own particular sources story isn’t exactly as effective in this component, yet despite everything I view it as a genuinely solid bit of news coverage. While it doesn’t have the promptness and show of alternate stories, it takes a more vibe great and merry approach. I believe I could have discovered an all the more energizing story, yet very preferred the changed topics of my 3 pieces. Conclusion While I totally comprehend the requirement for predisposition and political remaining to be kept separate from news stories and reports, not all parts of the news-casting exchange require this. For instance, feature writers develop a whole fan construct and notoriety situated in light of their clever and fascinating interpretation of the news. Being objective and unprejudiced in news coverage will fill a need similarly as basically announcing the news goes, yet one must figure out how to connect certain parts and duties with various zones of the specialty. I have dependably thought of myself as an able author, yet have discovered the news composing side to some degree testing since I began my degree. We have learned in our addresses and workshops that news composing takes after a specific equation which I am doing my best to learn, however up until this latest task my training has for the most part been composing from anecdotal briefs. While supportive, this does not give the columnist to be the genuine feeling of reality that this assignment has given. Sitting in on both court cases and gathering gatherings in circumstances that were possibly extraordinary for those included has been a significantly more compensating background for me. It is this experience with the general population straightforwardly influenced by the news I am composing that I feel shapes the rehearsing writer and give them adequate regard for the significance of maintaining their parts and obligations over the span of their vocation. One can’t genuinely value the requirement for maintaining the implicit rules set up by the PCC and Ofcom, or have an entire comprehension of the essential duties being a writer involves, without the direct understanding of working with genuine individuals. I feel that my own particular stories in this task were fruitful bits of news composing and more distant than that, of an adequate standard for distributing in provincial daily papers. Nonetheless, I feel that the things I have considered in this report will be the impetus for me to get out and enhance my certainty and capacities further and effectively attempt to examine stories with a genuine view to getting them distributed.>