“To compare the effectiveness of Homeopathy and Conventional therapy in Acute Otitis Media.”
Is the research question well stated? Why or why not?
Does the author cite relevant evidence, experiences, and/or information essential to the issue at hand?
Does the author show a sensitivity to what he or she is assuming or taking for granted? (Insofar as those assumptions might reasonably questioned)?
Does the author develop a definite line of reasoning, explaining well how he or she is arriving at his or her conclusions?
How would you take findings from this research and apply it in "real life?"
What would you say to a client who asked you for your opinion about this article?