David Jones is a 68 year old married white male. David current resides at his home in Rawlins, Wyoming on a ranch with his wife Sarah who is a 65 year old white female. David and Sarah have been married for 42 years. David and Sarah have three adult children John (40), Elizabeth (38), and Pamela (34). David appears to be neatly dressed and agitated. David has been referred for treatment to the Veterans Administration by his wife Sarah.
Describe the client’s demographical information. 3. Analyze the client’s presenting problem. 4. Describe the client’s diagnoses using the DSM-5 as a foundation. 5. Apply the assessments used to approach the diagnosis (depression scale, alcoholism screening, ADHD, et cetera). 6. Apply a mental health theory applied from your readings to the case (such as but not limited to cognitive, solution-focused, object relations, narrative, behavioral, or self-psychology). 7. Apply a treatment intervention and describe the specific and best treatment intervention applied, including descriptions of the: o Client’s strengths, weaknesses, and social support systems in the treatment intervention plan applied. o Client’s long-term goal for the treatment intervention plan applied. o Client’s short-term goals and treatment objectives for the treatment intervention plan applied. 8. Create a treatment timeline. 9. Apply the systems theory perspective to include the client’s family (treatment at the micro, mezzo, and macro level). 10. Explain at least one of the potential ethical dilemmas and how to address it through NASW ethical guidelines. 11. Explain the diversity needs for client or family and how to address those needs. 12. Explain how you will evaluate the client’s progress. Describe a client’s demographic information, presenting problem, and diagnoses.
Lacan’s View of the Linguistic Structure of the Unconscious Distributed: 23rd March, 2015 Last Edited: eleventh December, 2017 Disclaimer: This paper has been put together by an understudy. This isn’t a case of the work composed by our expert exposition scholars. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any assessments, discoveries, conclusions or suggestions communicated in this material are those of the writers and don’t really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. Lacan’s View of the Linguistic Structure of the Unconscious and Implications for the Relevance of Psychoanalysis to the Social World Jacques Lacan has been known as the most persuasive psychoanalyst since Freud. The effect of his work, both as a hypothesis of the oblivious and as a collection of clinical practices, is reflected in the utilization of Lacanian techniques by finished portion of psychoanalysts around the world. Lacanian ideas and builds additionally are flourishing outside the counseling room, in the investigations of writing and film, in women’s activist examinations and lawful examinations, global relations and social strategy. Be that as it may, what does therapy need to do with the social world? Antiquarians, social and political researchers have challenged a part for therapy in their separate social areas. There is expect that mental lessening is definitely comes about, bringing down the ‘goal’ social circle to the subjective level of a ‘culture on a sofa’. Be that as it may, the hypothesis and routine with regards to analysis require not be atomistic. Freud respected the investigation of foundations, dialects, writing and craftsmanship as an essential to effectively appreciating the systematic experience. Like Freud, and in his task of coming back to Freud, Jacques Lacan examined and obtained from a scope of unique fields, including rationality, structuralist human sciences, writing, music, geology and semiology/etymology. He concurred with Freudon the authenticity of social examination roused from a psychoanalytic point of view. In A Theoretical Introduction to the Functions of Psychoanalysis in Criminology (1950), Lacan communicated his situation as takes after: It might be well that since its experience is restricted to the individual, therapy can’t claim to get a handle on the totality of any sociological question, or even the whole of causes right now working in our general public. All things considered, in its treatment of the individual, therapy has found social pressures that seem to assume a central part in all social orders, as though the discontent in human advancement went so far as to uncover the exceptionally joint of nature to culture. In the event that one makes the suitable change, one can expand the recipes of therapy concerning this joint to certain human sciences that can use them (Stavrakakis, 1999, p. 3). Anthony Elliott (1992) refered to Lacan’s thoughts as setting up the chief terms of reference for contemplating the interconnections between the mind and social field (p. 2). In this vein, Feher-Gurewich battled that Lacan’s psychoanalytic approach is established on premises that are in sharp difference to the ones which have prompted the disappointment of a cooperation amongst therapy and social hypothesis (Stavrakakis, 1999, p. 14). One arrangement of these premises is the point of this dialog. The accompanying is an endeavor to clarify Lacan’s claim that the oblivious is organized like a dialect and to talk about the bearing this claim has on the pertinence of therapy to the social world. Initial, a short diagram of Lacan’s vocation, or ‘task,’ may help with supporting this investigation. Diagram of Lacan’s Project Albeit numerous see his hypothetical fills in as impervious or as an incomprehensible scramble, there are ongoing ideas all through. Lacan reliably saw his main goal to be an arrival to Freud. The keynote for this arrival was his arrangement of dialect as the focal develop in principle and in practice(Clement, 1983). The Mirror Stage Starting in the late 1930s, after the production of various contextual analyses, Lacan started to center around the rise of the feeling of self, the capacity of the I. He named this rise the Mirror Stage in the improvement of a tyke’s feeling of self amid the initial two years of life. Drawing upon disclosures from his own particular psychoanalytic experience, together with crafted by clinicians, for example, Henri Wallon, Charlotte Bãâ¼hler, and Otto Rank, Lacan placed that the tyke’s emanant feeling of self is framed upon section into dialect, the domain of the emblematic, and dependably in reference to some “other. That other could be the kid’s own picture in a mirror, the mother or any number of different articles with which the kid related self by means of Freud’s system of narcissistic distinguishing proof. The mirror arrange is the cause of a principal estrangement or split in the person’s feeling of self. The talking subject (I) progresses toward becoming de-focused from the perfect self image (me). Since self is arranged toward an ‘other’ who is seen as perfect/all-powerful, and along these lines as a potential opponent to the self, the personality that rises up out of this stage is described by an antagonistic vibe that undermines its extremely presence. Lacan presumed that human personality is shaped just inside this intersubjective setting in which distance and aggressivity portray the normal state. As opposed to being the initial move toward the development of a solid and stable sense of self, his suggestion that méconnaissance, or misperception, is fundamental to the inner self arrangement went against an essential build of personality brain science, that the conscience is the root and premise of mystic strength. In 1953, Lacan broke with the predominant group of conscience analysts and framed his own proficient gathering, the Société franaise de psychanalytique(SFP). The Discourse of Rome Amid the main gathering of this gathering, in Rome that year, Lacan introduced a paper which rapidly ended up known as the proclamation of the new society. He contended that discourse and, all the more for the most part, dialect were integral to psychoanalytic practice and to any hypothetical conclusions that may be extrapolated from it. He drew upon and adjusted the semiologic standards of Ferdinand de Saussure and the philosophical conventions of Hegel for his hypothetical vocabulary. It is amid this time Lacan’s open concentration moved plainly from the formative to the semantic. Drawing from the dialect of music, he placed three registers of working, the emblematic, nonexistent and genuine. The representative, an element of discourse/dialect, was viewed as focal and in unique cooperation with the fanciful. Lacan’s acidic portrayal of the personality as the seat of neuros is instead of the wellspring of mystic joining and his accentuation on the representative association of the human mind an opened new area for psychoanalytic hypothesis. Lacan acknowledged Freud for the idea and faulted his sense of self analyst devotees for clouding the point. Meta-hypothesis The charge that psychoanalysts had relinquished the establishing writings of their calling exacerbated strains between the conscience brain research and the SFP until the point when Lacan left the gathering in 1963 to frame another association, the École Freudienne de Paris (EFP). Lacan proceeded with his nearby readings of Freud’s writings, yet he currently started to present various terms and ideas not found in Freud’s own particular work. When his chose papers seemed 1966, his courses were standing-room-as it were. Numerous in the group related him with structuralists, for example, Jacques Derrida, Claude Lévi-Strauss, and Michel Foucault. Likewise with different individuals from this gathering, Lacan was frequently reprimanded for the trouble of his style. Inside the EFP itself, a large number of the honing examiners were worried about what they saw as the undeniably hypothetical and scholarly accentuation of Lacan’s work. Amid this phase of his profession, Lacan started progress in the direction of a “meta-hypothesis” of analysis, building thoughts regarding Lacanian thoughts. His build of the three registers extended to three or more measurements. He endeavored to recast his before experiences in the more exact dialect of science, utilizing topological figures, for example, the Klein container and Borromean hitch, to represent and investigate the relationship among his hypothetical builds. Notwithstanding, a considerable lot of Lacan’s adherents censured this approach, grumbling that his contentions were progressively immeasurable and unessential to clinical practice. Lacan’s reaction was the disintegration the EFP and the establishing of yet another affiliation, the École de la Cause Freudienne, which he coordinated until his demise in 1981. The Structure of the Unconscious and Relevance to the Social World In the Introductory Lectures to Psychoanalysis, Freud remarked that the oblivious can be contrasted with a dialect without a language (Laplanche and Pontalis, 1983). Lacan, utilizing structuralist semantics, endeavored to systematize this conflict, contending that the oblivious is organized like a dialect, and that ‘it talks’/ca parle. A side effect, Lacan asserted, might be perused as a typified representation. As Freud had contended, what is in question inside an indication is a subdued want shocking to the intentionally acknowledged self-origination and estimations of the subject. This craving, in the event that it is to pick up fulfillment by any stretch of the imagination, in like manner should be communicated in a roundabout way. For instance, a leftover childish want to stroke off may discover fulfillment in a roundabout way in a habitual custom the subject feels constrained to rehash. Similarly as one may figuratively portray one’s adoration as a rose, Lacan contends, here we have a quelled want being allegorically communicated in some clearly unique substantial movement. Similarly, drawing on specific minutes inside Freud’s papers On the Psychology of Love, Lacan contends that longing is organized as a metonymy. In metonymy, one assigns an entire idea (e.g.: military power) by naming a segment of it (e.g.: a sword). Lacan’s contention is that, similarly, since mutilation denies subjects full access to their first loveobject (the mother), their>