Sense-Making and Communication of Findings
Data Analysis, Sense-Making, and Communication of Findings
Please see the attached/scanned document for the instructions. It is too large to upload to this area.
Instructions Having completed this weekt required readings, you are now at least preliminarily familiar with many different approaches and techniques for conducting qualitative data research. It Is important that you continue your exploration of these techniques, so as to potentially identify what ones suit you as a scholar and analyst. This means the task for this week is to help you deepen your understanding of those techniques, not just in terms of how they might be applied and work to shed light on analytical riddles of many different kinds, but also enhancing your general knowledge aboutthe strengths and weaknesses of such approaches depending on the research.
Utilizing the databases and library resource links given to you this week, you are tasked with locating TWO (2) research studies that employed one of the techniques you read about in detail in your required readings for conducting qualitative data analysis. It is important that you find two studies that employed different qualitative data analysis techniques. It is suggested (but not required) that you find studies that have used QDA techniques that you think could be preferred for your own future research. This means the assignment will have ‘legs’ in terms of the long-term benefit it gives to your knowledge and skill development in qualitative methods. It is not relevant as to what the subject of study is for the two projects chosen or the analytical riddles the author(s) were attempting to solve, though it could be beneficial if the studies are investigating areas of research you think are of potential interest or connection to your eventual dissertation project. In this way the task for this week could provide you with important training and familiarity not only with the overall body of knowledge in an area of import, but with a possible technique you might be interested in using for your own future research.
The task with the two chosen studies is to analytically dissect the QDA method used within the projects. You will need to create an analytic memo using NVivo for this assignment. Be sure to explicitly reference your required reading when discussing the QDA methods used within the studies. More importantly, you should be attempting to analyze the project from the four fundamental tasks that were identified as Innate to QDA:
• DATA REDUCTION • IDENTIFYING NEW PATTERNS AND THEMES • DISPLAYING THE DATA • DRAWING CONCLUSIONS AND VERIFICATION OF THE FINDINGS
Break down your analysis of each of the two selected projects along the four categories above (again, be sure to explicitly reference your required readings where possible). Keep in mind this is not a simple literature review or summary of an individual project: rather, you should be critiquing the two projects based on the QDA method employed. In other words, your report produced this week should break down how the above four tasks were addressed by the researchers, always keeping in mind that you are trying to ascertain and assess if the chosen QDA technique was indeed the best approach to use for the given project. Thus, you are ultimately inducing in your analytical breakdown a strength/weakness matrix for the employed QDA methods. It is hoped this multi-pronged approach to analyzing QDA will reinforce your familiarity with multiple QDA methods that you yourself are potentially interested in pursuing as a future scholar/analyst in this doctoral program.
Finally, you must address one final aspect for both chosen studies:
• Do the conclusions reached suggest opportunities for further research or expand the potential for other projects and would those future opportunities be best met with the same QDA method or would a different QDA method be better? Which one and why?
This final question helps orient your scholarly thinking in an essentially valuable way: when concluding research, we are not just obligated to firmly place our work within an established body of knowledge, contributing to that body in a new and original way, but we should also be constructing research in a manner that will allow others to work with it, enhance it, challenge it, and/or refine it. This is the inevitable and essential cycle of knowledge production that potentially develops all the way into a school of thought, not just a body of knowledge. So, this last part of week 7’s assignment is meant to get you thinking in this biggest of big picture terms. Your ability to read, analyze, critique, and assess a research project (in both its methodological approaches and substantive conclusions) becomes fully activated when that breakdown lets you envision new research projects and opportunities.
In terms of formal assignment parameters, please pay attention to the following:
• Completion of the strengths/weaknesses memo (covering the four main areas of QDA research with required reading references) should be 1000-1500 words for EACH chosen research project, totaling 2000-3000 words overall. • Completion of the future research component of the memo should be approximately 500 words for each chosen research project, totaling 1000 words overall. • Please be sure to use formal Chicago-style for any and all citations.
Once you have completed loading your memo into NVivo be sure you export it and load t within this assignment section using the last name QDA analysis memo naming convention.