2. Critically assess the various operational strategies used in markets that are in differing stages of economic development.
4. Discuss and justify relevant business strategies and activities within specified cross-cultural and international settings.
1. Assignment task
This assignment requires that you prepare a 10 – 15 minutes long original presentation answering the following task:
Choose a real company originating in one of the following transition countries /economies: Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia or Slovenia. The company is currently evaluating the opportunity for expanding into a developed country/economy where it is not yet currently present. You are expected present a comprehensive and well documented plan for its expansion. Your presentation should include the following:
A. Company analyses
1. A summary of the company’s products / services and brands;
2. An analysis of the company within the domestic market (you may use a SWOT matrix or choose a different model / matrix from the literature to enable you to provide an accurate description of internal and external challenges and opportunities that capture the company’s current situation in its domestic market);
3. A profile of the company’s consumers in its domestic market.
B. Global analyses
1. A brief presentation of at least two developed country markets where your company of choice will be successful upon expansion. This section should include a comparative analysis of the relevant social, economic, cultural, political and legal environments of the two countries. You may choose to focus on minimum three environments of relevance;
2. A clear justification for choosing one of these country markets for the expansion of your company of choice.
C. Entry strategy and marketing plan for your country of choice
1. A discussion about the market entry strategy that you recommend for adoption by the company, including justifying arguments;
2. A marketing plan explaining (1) the positioning that the company plans to achieve on the new market; (2) the strategies that the company will employ to achieve the desired positioning; (3) a justification of which elements of the marketing mix the company will adapt or standardized for the new market.
Military power and advancing compassionate qualities Distributed: 29th December, 2017 Last Edited: 29th December, 2017 Disclaimer: This exposition has been put together by an understudy. This isn’t a case of the work composed by our expert article authors. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any suppositions, discoveries, conclusions or proposals communicated in this material are those of the writers and don’t really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. This exposition will contend that military power is an insufficient instrument for the advancement of compassionate qualities. Be that as it may, this is qualified by additionally displaying explanations behind marking down the viability of non-military intercessions. This exposition will be organized as takes after. The principal areas will go up against methodological issues that must be tended to before the inquiry can be replied. Following this we will set out on a correlation of military and non-military mediations. The paper will assess a worldview instance of an effective task, Australia in East Timor. We will contend it is irregular and can scarcely qualify as a honest to goodness intercession. We at that point see a genuine instance of an intercession, Afghanistan, and presume this constitutes a disappointment of a military advancement of philanthropic qualities. We will then move onto assess two instances of non-military intercessions, UN Resolutions and monetary approvals. It will be contended that UN sanctions are weak, with reference to the activities of Israel. The exposition will then look at the assents set on Iraq, and contend that they caused a more noteworthy helpful emergency than any up to this point experienced intercession. The paper will finish up with reasons why one should cease from drawing methodological statutes from past mediations, and promoters a case-by-case investigation. It is essential to restrict the extent of this civil argument. Most importantly, I won’t talk about issues, for example, the authenticity of military power being utilized as a part of national freedom developments with the exchange rather concentrating on outsider military intercession. There are questions that further should be tended to: Firstly, what constitutes military power? Is it the insignificant nearness of military staff (e.g. UN Peacekeeping powers), or does it need to be dynamic military interest? Also, what are philanthropic qualities? Thirdly, how can one gauge the advancement of such qualities? Is there a quantifiable method to ask whether their advancement has been viable? Fourthly, are there contextual analyses which can be swung to with a specific end goal to address the inquiry? In the event that there has never been a truly helpful mediation, at that point it will be difficult to evaluate the accomplishment of such an undertaking. Because of the primary inquiry, it is more straightforward to treat every military intercession of a similar kind. Consider the criteria set out by the Red Cross (1997), contending that an essential for a mediation to be compassionate it must be nonpartisan, unprejudiced and autonomous. The situation of the Red Cross is that no furnished power could fulfill these prerequisites sponsored as they are by political governments with their own motivation. On the off chance that one discovers this pertinent, at that point there is no at first sight purpose behind recognizing between hired soldier, state-upheld and UN organisations. With respect to compassionate qualities, and how to quantify their adequacy, to discover a view supported by accord is relatively unimaginable. We stand up to positions as various as basic, utilitarian estimations of the measure of individuals whose lives have been spared (Janzekovic, 2006: 144) to more particular positions, for example, Regan (1996: 341-342) who guarantees that an intercession can be considered fruitful in the event that it destabilizes the area in such a way, so it is more troublesome for the persecuting state to proceed with its human rights infringement. This position would not utilize a transient estimation, for example, passings to gauge the accomplishment of an intercession. Be that as it may, I might blunder on the less complex estimation. This is basically because of that the estimation of wounds, fatalities and misuse in a contention is a less complex device of examination, instead of an obscure thought, for example, ‘great destabilisation'. At last, with reference to whether there has been a bona fide helpful mediation, the appropriate response is by all accounts negative. Despite regardless of whether one concurs with the verifiable examination in the books refered to, there is a logical issue for professors in honest to goodness mediation, which is the sporadic and conflicting utilization of such intercessions. This is the thing that Paris (2014: 578-588) calls the irregularity issue. The push of the issue is that such conflicting utilization of military mediation with respect to compassionate emergencies suggests that there is something other than sacrificial means propelling the intervenors. Albeit different components influence the capacity to intercede (Binder: 2009), there is a solid inspiration that, when joined with the chronicled record, compassionate mediation is a misnomer. In any case, let us leave this issue to the side. What we should talk about now is the accompanying: “Do military intercessions for ostensibly philanthropic finishes, spare a greater number of lives than non-military means for similar closures?” Give us a chance to look at a portion of the paradigmatic instances of fruitful military mediation. One frequently refered to is the achievement of the Australian intercession in East Timor in 1999. The intercession was required because of the Indonesian governments harsh measures used to subdue an East Timorese populace relentless on freedom from Jakarta. Amid the choice crusade, there was across the board utilization of state army terrorizing to suppress bolster for autonomy, joined by far reaching human rights infringement. The activities of the Indonesian powers brought about the uprooting of around 40,000 – 85,000 East Timorese (T. Seybolt, 2007: 88.)). The accomplishment of the Australian military has been commended by a few, for example, Wheeler and Dunne (2001) who took such accomplishment as totalling very nearly a change in outlook on the viability and new standardizing point of view of a compassionate intercession (standing out it from the plot of the United States in the savage control of the East Timor in 1975 (Amnesty International, 1985). In any case, in spite of the fact that the Australian mediation is to a great extent thought about fruitful, sadly, it doesn’t meet the criteria of a helpful intercession. Philanthropic intercessions, under most definitions (Roberts, 2003:5) must be a military activity without the assent of the mistreating power, for this situation, Indonesia. Nonetheless, as is noted by Chesterman (2002), Australia looked for the assent of the Indonesian government, before interceding. The Australian legislature of the fifth of September said that they would just consider intercession if four conditions were met: (I) there was a security chamber order, (ii) if the Indonesian government agreed, (iii) if the undertaking was a transient one, and (iv) if the power had a solid territorial segment Wheeler and Dunne (in the same place p.807). What makes the way that assent was looked for from Indonesia extensively stranger was the way that, aside from Australia, the global network did not trust that Indonesia had any rights over East Timor, with East Timor being universally thought to be an autonomous state. As Chesterman goes onto note also, that, in spite of the fact that usually refered to be a case of effective intercession, the reality remains that the global network showed incredible hesitance in interceding (appeared differently in relation to their energy with respect to Bosnia). Chesterman infers that if Australia had not mediated, nobody else would have (Chesterman 2002:181)) There are likewise huge reasons that the explanation behind Australian intercession were not really unbiased either, as Chesterman additionally takes note of that the Howard Government of Australia was most likely more stressed over the inundation of displaced people that would originate from such an emergency (a point which is validated by Gonzalez-Forester (2004), who reports Australia and different nations past vacillations to savage Indonesian activities towards the East-Timorese.) This contextual investigation seems to help the inquiry postured in the confirmed, as once the Australian powers mediated, the degree of the slaughters and seizures halted extensively. Along these lines, there appears to be some inspiration for considering military intercession a valuable procedure. Be that as it may, there are likewise other extensive issues by extrapolating from this illustration. Most importantly, the Indonesian powers assented to their mediation, so the Australians were entering a relatively un-threatening condition, and furthermore, this reality is supported by the for the most part warm relations amongst Australia and Indonesia. With the goal for us to extrapolate from this case, we would need to perceive how well intercessions perform in a nation which does not straightforwardly agree to the mediation from an outsider. Such a case would be Afghanistan, a nation that has twice been mediated by unfriendly powers supporting clearly compassionate objectives (both Russia (1979-1989) and the United States (2001-Ongoing)). Both of these mediations have had the ostensible inspiration of compassionate closures, and both have, to some degree worked towards them. On account of the Russian intercession, it is by all accounts that the endeavor to intercede has fizzled, in spite of the endeavor to execute dynamic approaches (Bennis, 2015). The report refered to records how their endeavors to actualize dynamic arrangements in the rustic zones of Afghanistan incited across the board disobedience, along these lines aggravating the compassionate circumstance extensively. The United States intercession at first appeared to be a more smart mediation, with there being a profession of the military intercession being joined by helpful guide drops. Be that as it may, as Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) take note of, the guide bundles of sustenance (which just happened around once per month) had an indistinguishable yellow bundling from bunch bombs, which prompted various setbacks (Calas and Salignon: 2004, p>