write a book review of Live and Die Like a Man: Gender Dynamics in Urban Egypt.
Summary of argument. Your review should, as concisely as possible, summarize the book’s argument. . What, ultimately, is this book’s raison d’être? If there is an identifiable thesis statement, you may consider quoting it directly.
About the author(s). Who are they? What are they known for? What particular sorts of qualifications and expertise do they bring to the subject? How might the work you are reviewing fit into a wider research or career trajectory?
Summary of contents. A reasonably thorough indication of the research methods used (if applicable) and of the range of substantive material covered in the book should be included.
Strength. Identify one particular area in which you think the book does well. This should, ideally, be its single greatest strength as an academic work.
Weakness. Identify one particular area in which you think the book could be improved. While this weakness might be related to something you actually believe to be incorrect, it is more likely to be something that the author omitted, or neglected to address in sufficient detail.
Conclusion. End your review with a concluding statement summarizing your opinion of the book. You should also explicitly identify a range of audiences whom you think would appreciate reading or otherwise benefit from the book
Customary Costing Methods versus Activity Based Costing (ABC) Distributed: 23rd March, 2015 Last Edited: 25th April, 2018 Disclaimer: This exposition has been put together by an understudy. This isn’t a case of the work composed by our expert exposition journalists. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any feelings, discoveries, conclusions or proposals communicated in this material are those of the writers and don’t really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. In this report I will endeavor to find whether it is attainable as an organization to change the Traditional techniques for costing we at present use to the more current Activity Based Costing strategies, taking a gander at the advantages and downsides of changing and whether it merits executing these new costing techniques to our organization all in all. Presentation/Background As a little nearby building firm we at present utilize the Traditional costing technique where we distribute Production overheads based on coordinate work hours. Does this give a reasonable and precise portrayal of the genuine cost of consumption every item devours or should we as an organization change over to the Activity Based Costing framework or ABC as I will allude to it from here in, where we initially allocates expenses to the exercises that are the genuine reason for the overhead and after that dole out the cost of those exercises just to the items that are really requesting the exercises. Would this give a reasonable and more practical take a gander at the way we cost employments. In this report I will take a gander at the two strategies and decide if we as an organization should change the way we cost our occupations and on the off chance that we do change to the ABC technique for costing, what the conditions are of executing this to us. Conventional Costing Methods Presently we receive the more customary method for allocating our generation overheads which includes the overhead rate being ascertained utilizing direct work hours, machine hours, or units, for our situation utilizing direct work hours. The benefits of utilizing this framework are: Effortlessness – the computation of overhead rates is generally clear; They are generally comprehended in business; They are not costly to work; Until the point when the late 1980s they were viewed as genuinely precise; They are as yet being utilized after numerous decades. The shortcomings of conventional costing frameworks are: Their dependence on self-assertive instead of circumstances and end results assignment of overheads; Their failure to give exact item costs in multiproduct organizations; Their inability to break down non-producing costs. (“Conventional costing framework.” A Dictionary of Business and Management. 2006. Encyclopedia.com. 19 Nov. 2010 . ) At present utilizing the conventional strategy for cost bookkeeping we are dispensing the processing plant’s circuitous expenses to the things fabricated based on coordinate work hours, By utilizing just work hours to apportion the assembling overhead to items, we are suggesting that the work hours are the fundamental reason for the production line overhead. Generally, that may have been adequate for the organization’s outside budgetary proclamations. Nonetheless, in late decades the assembling overhead has been caused by numerous different elements. For instance, a few clients are probably going to request extra assembling tasks for their items. Different clients just need incredible amounts of item. In the event that we need to know the genuine cost to create particular items for particular clients, the customary strategy for cost bookkeeping is insufficient. ABC was created to defeat the inadequacies of the customary strategy. Rather than only one costing, for example, work hours, ABC will utilize numerous costings to allot our circuitous expenses. A couple of the costings that would be utilized under ABC incorporate the quantity of machine setups, the pounds of material obtained or utilized, the quantity of designing change arranges, the quantity of machine hours, et cetera. So do we keep on using this framework since it is easy to utilize and has been utilized for a considerable length of time or do we need a more precise examination and breakdown of the way we distribute costs. Action Based Costing (ABC) Action Based Costing (ABC) is an Information System created in the 1980s to defeat a portion of the impediments of customary cost bookkeeping and to upgrade its convenience to vital basic leadership. ABC frameworks are outlined and executed on the start that items expend exercises, exercises devour assets and assets expend costs (Sprow, 1992). ABC frameworks allocate expenses to exercises in light of their utilization of assets, and afterward movement costs are doled out to items or administrations in extent to a chose measure of their individual workloads (Anderson, 1993; p. 7). ABC frameworks look at all procedures (or exercises) that are really applicable to the generation of an item and endeavor to decide precisely what bit of every asset is expended i.e. which action a specific item employments. (M. Gupta, K. Galloway/Technovation 23 (2003) 131-138) Why the requirement for ABC, you may inquire; These days administrators are confronting worldwide rivalry and expanded efficiency in new assembling conditions. Organizations endeavor to wind up client concentrated and focus on quality items at aggressive costs. Under these conditions, numerous organizations are keen on deciding different costs all the more precisely with the target to coordinate assembling and showcasing procedures. Different costing frameworks are utilized to give an expanded precision about item costs, item blend, valuing and other venture choice makings. A few encounters uncover that the twisting in detailed item costs and, thus, item valuing could be lessened by utilizing action based costing (ABC) (A. Gunasekaran, M. Sarhadil Int. J. Creation Economics 56-57 (1998) 231-242) What are the advantages then of this new and present day method for costing, is it extremely the path forward for us. It won’t kill costs however it will give us nitty gritty data about the way we are expending them, accordingly assisting us to detach issue territories with the view to amending why the expenses are so high in these regions. ABC costing is a decent apparatus where distinctive clients require diverse necessities. It’s an unwritten run regarded by numerous in the business world that you for the most part treat your best clients the best. The issue is, do you truly know who your best clients are, or do you think you know? The dominant part of businessmen have the false observation that the best client is the one that records for the biggest bit of your pay each year. This isn’t generally the case for the basic reason that a similar client might be in charge of the greatest piece of your costs too. Studies have demonstrated that 20% of all clients for all intents and purposes give every one of the benefits of an organization. Another 60% make back the initial investment and the staying 20% just lessen the main issue. Wouldn’t it be pleasant on the off chance that you had the names of that 20% of migraine actuating clients that are actually more inconvenience than they’re worth? To decide how much a client is costing you, you should first recognize the exercises that identify with every client and decide the aggregate cost consumed by those exercises. These exercises or “cost drivers” ought to be viewed as then to gauge the level of action consumed by every client. A definitive motivation behind executing ABC is to isolate these exercises into singular cost drivers. At that point, you should simply quantify every client’s investment in the particular cost. (The ABC Portal is © 2002 Offtech Computing Pty Ltd.) So with our clients’ needs being diverse as far as particular safe houses and outlines we could cost employments all the more precisely to every client. Taking a gander at the downsides to the ABC costing framework, we would need to consider the information accumulation process for this new framework could turn out to be extremely tedious alongside the capital use on this new framework and its consequent running expenses. Worker obstruction should likewise be considered. This is a noteworthy hindrance in usage of an ABC framework. Such obstruction is normal as the most well-known target is to give a diminishment in overhead expenses, and in all conditions this could bring about a decrease in work force. So to separate it the points of interest and disservices of ABC are; The fundamental preferences: Evaluates expenses of individual exercises, in light of their utilization of assets Empowers precise costing of all exercises to be acquired all through an association. Simple to recognize where high (and low) costs are being brought about and the reason. A profitable apparatus for both business and process change Assists with future item arranging e.g. the cost of all exercises related with an item or administration can be precisely decided before it is propelled. This would then be able to help with deciding evaluating, and any related use. Disservices include: It might be hard to set up and build up, especially if an association is utilizing more conventional bookkeeping procedures. (boundaries to change) Can be tedious if all exercises are to be cost May give excessively detail – clouding the master plan. Can prompt worker and conceivable administration disharmony.>