You have a corrections officer who has worked in the county jail for 7 years. He has been described as a dedicated, competent employee, one who is well respected by colleagues and administrators alike. However, personal problems have arisen in his life. His wife is filing for divorce, and his daughter, contrary to his wishes, is involved with a man who has been arrested on several occasions for domestic violence. On this particular day, he reports for work tired and irritable after dealing with problems at home. One 18-year-old inmate quickly begins to get on his nerves. He never stops complaining, with most of his complaints directed at the officer. Finally, after telling the inmate to “shut up or else” several times, the officer lost control and slapped him hard across the face, leaving a mark and a small cut.
The confrontation was witnessed by other inmates. This is the first time that this has happened to the officer. His supervisor sends another officer to cover his post, and he reports to the superintendent’s office. He recounts the incident, concluding with “I did it; I hit him hard and deserve to be fired. Or would you let me resign? I am very sorry it happened this way.” During the initial investigation, the superintendent feels confident that the officer has violated several tenets outlined in the code of ethics for public safety personnel, and he forwards his disciplinary recommendation for your review.
Research the correctional officer codes of ethics to confirm any potential violations, as outlined by the superintendent. Then, address the following in 2 pages:
After completing your review of the case file, explain what you would do under these circumstances.
explain the role of corrections agencies and then research different codes of ethics related to corrections officers, and base your responses on a particular code of ethics. You can choose from codes of ethics promulgated by different professional associations such as the American Correctional Association, or you can use the code of ethics promulgated by a particular state’s department of corrections.
“The ordinary atomic family is now a relic of times gone by,” composes Madeleine Bunting, creator of ‘Willing Slaves: How the Overwork Culture is Ruling Our Lives’. Current measurements do without a doubt paint a stressing picture; in the previous 30 years the rate of separation has doubled, Britain presently having the most astounding separation rate in Europe. Simultaneously, the extent of ladies in all day work has trebled, with maternal business having expanded by 8% to 65%. As a firm devotee to the Nuclear Family show, these discoveries and forecasts are of specific individual concern. Consequently I have picked this territory as the concentration for my sociological research. I have focused my investigation on the connection between the regularly changing female sex generalization, and the elevated rates of separation. My test theory is along these lines as takes after: “Separation is more predominant among families where the mother does not enthusiastically acknowledge the conventional female sex business generalization.’ Settings and Concepts: The setting of this theory is best comprehended in light of two research examines which have been led already here. The first was an exploratory research think about directed by Geoff Dench of Middlesex University into men’s family parts, entitled “The Place of Men in Changing Family Cultures.” In this examination, Dench recognized two primary family composes; the ‘ordinary family’ and the ‘deregulated family.’ The ordinary family display speaks to a conventional family detailing in which every part has relational rights and commitments emerging from their marriage [or birth, if children]. The corresponding help structure natural in this model outcomes in singular free decision being constrained; simply individual interests may consequently should be imperiled. Dench distinguished that individuals from this gathering would be more disposed to see a qualification between what might be beneficial for them as an individual, and what might be useful for the family overall. The deregulated family show speaks to a nonconformist family plan in which every part is in charge of maintaining their own rights and transactions of those rights. To this degree, singular decision is common inside this gathering; self-sufficiency being the overall perfect. Respondents in this gathering communicated a view that customary sexual orientation parts were a wellspring of social foul play, and rejected the thought of the ‘regular family’ as perfect on this ground. Dench recognized that supporters of this model had a tendency to be youthful, childless couples. While this investigation yielded a few exceptionally fascinating discoveries, it is one conclusion specifically which is most significant to the investigation of this paper: Dench found that the ‘largest amounts of individual and conjugal fulfillment were among individuals who lived in customary families. The most elevated amounts were associated with families in which the man worked and the lady was at home. The most minimal levels happened when the lady worked and the man remained at home.’ This is the specific conclusion which I am endeavoring to demonstrate inside this examination think about, through my speculation that “Separation is more common among families where the mother does not enthusiastically acknowledge the customary female sex business generalization.” The idea of ‘conventional female sex work generalization’ portraying the circumstance where the part of the spouse is as provider of the family [i.e. gives the essential family income], and where the part of the spouse is as ‘housewife’ [i.e. the essential household labourer]. The second research examine is entitled “The development of Lone Parenthood: Diversity and Dynamics”, and was directed by Karen Rowlingson, Stephen McKay and Richard Berthoud for the benefit of the University of Derby’s Economic and Social Research Council. Their discoveries, while not particularly worried about the issue of the female sex business generalization, recommended that separation happens all the more every now and again in families where the lady abandons her all day work to care for a recently arrived tyke. By all appearances, this finding would recommend that my decision is defective; all things considered, doubtlessly a lady who leaves work to take care of her recently conceived tyke is sticking to the customary business generalization, and ought to thusly be more averse to participate in separation or detachment from her accomplice. This finding anyway does not repudiate my theory, rather serves to contextualize it; this finding from the investigation concerned ladies who had beforehand been non-customary business generalization conformists, yet had been compelled to surrender their work and take care of their youngster through situation. A lady who does not enthusiastically acknowledge her customary part is obviously more probably not going to be miserable, as her ‘individual self-governance’, which as talked about by Dench is held as the larger perfect by an endorser of the non-traditionalist model, isn’t being permitted to prevail. This clarifies why my theory is constrained to/focussed upon ladies who don’t ‘eagerly acknowledge’ the conventional sex work generalization. Primary Research Method and Reasons: In light of the undeniable troubles with really getting some information about their conjugal status and business, I have chosen that the most ideal approach to gather this data is by asking my kindred understudies at school to finish a review survey [a strategy for the most part connected with the positivist school of sociology]. It is obviously vital that a huge extent of my example populace have guardians who are separated, and visa versa. The issue with this prerequisite is that an arbitrary example of understudies may not hurl adequate of the previous classification. What I subsequently propose is a multi day outing to Somerset House in London, and furnished with a total rundown of all understudies at my school, I will cross reference their surnames against the Divorce Register. When I have recognized every one of the understudies whose guardians are currently separated, I will arbitrarily choose an extent of these understudies to participate in my study by allocating every understudy with a number and utilizing an arbitrary number generator program on my PC to choose which understudies will be chosen. By a similar arbitrary testing method, I will choose an indistinguishable number of understudies whose guardians are not separated. The advantage of leading this earlier research to recognize understudies whose guardians are separated is that it implies that the survey itself does not have to ask these individuals regardless of whether their folks are isolated. To make this inquiry may demonstrate to annoy the understudies; after all the separation of their folks isn’t something which most understudies would wish to examine or even review amid a sociological report, for example, mine. For the understudy’s whose guardians are clearly still together, wedded, affirm that the understudy still lives with the two guardians; after all in light of the fact that the guardians of these understudy’s don’t show up on the Divorce registry doesn’t mean they are as yet living respectively they could be isolated without separate, or during the time spent applying for a declaration nisi/total.>