1. The Situation: Prior to your travel program, your class decides to create hashtags, making it easy to share photos on social media. Everyone thinks this is a great idea and is anxious to participate. Unbeknownst to the teacher, a group of students decide to create an additional hashtag to pair with unflattering photos of a particular student, sneakily taken during the program. The group of students let their classmembers know about the other hashtag by word of mouth — and then you hear about it.
1.Refer to your Legendary Leadership List and how you’ve defined a good leader and positive character traits.
2. Read the story linked above about the girl who got even with her cyber bulliers. How did she use her leadership to prevent a bad situation from becoming worse?
3. Think about the situation above and how you would react. Answer the following questions in a three-page response or a three-four minute video. You are encouraged to use outside resources to cite statistics.
How would a good leader handle this situation?
How would you act in this situation?
Describe how you would show leadership to combat the bullying. Develop a plan of action (with at least three clear, distinct steps.)
Social media is extremely prevalent in our lives. How can it be manipulated to make a bad situation (like the one described above) turn out to be good?
Explain how both a positive and negative aspect of Nicole’s story surprised you. Finally, identify how your Legendary Leadership List applies to her.
Live Interpretation of Heritage Distributed: first August, 2018 Last Edited: first August, 2018 Disclaimer: This article has been put together by an understudy. This isn’t a case of the work composed by our expert paper scholars. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any suppositions, discoveries, conclusions or suggestions communicated in this material are those of the writers and don’t really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. Memorable Sites, Museums and Galleries Live understanding of Heritage Presentation In the course of recent decades legacy and culture has turned into a vital piece of individuals’ life, particularly in regard of their recreation and traveler exercises (Boyd 2003, p.1). This is especially valid on account of tourism, where the chronicled interest for traveler and relaxation exercises have disappeared for those loaded with more social components. There is an expanding want to visit memorable locales, historical centers and exhibitions in an endeavor by the person to take in more about their legacy and those of different societies and social gatherings. In the meantime, the present legacy guest has turned out to be additionally perceiving about the way that these settings introduce legacy experience to them (Boyd 2003, p.2). Basically hence, legacy can be believed to identify with authentic occasions and settings and the guest needs to encounter those verifiable encounters as a relatively physical occasion. Notwithstanding, in spite of the various explores and overview comes about that backings this adjustment in the guest request, there is still confirmation that various legacy destinations, historical centers and exhibitions are neglecting to respond decidedly to these discoveries (Black 2005, p.10), which much of the time has brought about a drop in guest numbers at these settings. This circumstance can have genuine outcomes, particularly for those legacy locales that depend upon extra charges to cross over any barrier between state subsidizing and the running expenses of the scene. Indeed, even where this not the situation, for instance where government financing is utilized to give free confirmation, such scenes are as yet responsible to the state and need to demonstrate that their foundation is conveying to the necessities of the general population, which a diminishment in guest numbers won’t accomplish. With an end goal to address this issue the most recent two decades have seen an expansion in writing related particularly to the way in which legacy is shown and depicted to the guest, making another train under the general title of legacy understanding. Legacy elucidation relates similarly to the comprehension of the site or questions showed for the guest and the inspiration determinant and necessities of that guest (Blockley and Hems 2006, p.1). As of not long ago, most scholastics concur that legacy elucidation has been the minimum created part of the setting’s advancement to the guest (Boyd 2003 and Blockley and Hems 2006). Elucidation structures and essential piece of the guest encounter and will impact the experience that they detract from the visit (Boyd 2003, p.193). In this way, it takes after that understanding what spurs a guest or gathering of guests will empower the historical center, exhibition or legacy site to be better ready to show and advance their item (in the same place 2003, p.64). For most guests that inspiration will be to pick up joy and gaining from the question or movement being shown. Much of the time, as Blockley and Hems (2006, p.10) propose in their examination the inspiration for the visit is to satisfy the person’s requirement for joy and inclining and if the legacy setting or protest does not accomplish this the guest will leave disappointed. Indeed, the guest has generally expected to be welcomed with visual perspectives, and enlivened showcases when going to legacy destinations (Dicks 2003, p.17). In this way it is fundamental for the setting supervisors to guarantee their goal and its substance meet these necessities. One part of translation that has gone to the fore in the psyches of the guest amid ongoing years, and a zone that scholastics concur is a fundamental piece of understanding, is the level of collaboration that exists between the guest and the legacy scene or protest. An ongoing advancement in this regard is the expanding utilization of different types of live elucidation inside the legacy show and other scene exercises, and it this region of understanding that will frame the point of convergence for this examination. Live Interpretation Live understanding of legacy is the most direct type of communication between the guest and the antiquities and occasions that are being shown at legacy destinations and settings. Guests and vacationers today hope to see live legacy and social shows instead of lifeless things showed in vacant or one dimensional building and show boxes. For instance, guests to mechanical galleries have generally expected to be dealt with to visual and moving presentations of recorded hardware and even to feel the experience through a living case of the general public of the time (Dicks 2003, p.29). The procedure of live translation can be conveyed in various configurations. One early case of live elucidation was accomplished by enabling the guest to interface with working models, which empowered them to all the more likely decipher the procedures that were included with that models operational reason. As the procedure of elucidation kept on developing, these working models were upgraded by the incorporation of sound and visual understanding techniques, which look into showed were seen to be more remunerating for the guest than composed content material, for example, handouts and books (Boyd 2003, p.231). The utilization of data and correspondence innovation is another zone of live elucidation that can demonstrate powerful, through a procedure of intelligent contribution or showing films and holographic pictures (Atkinson 2007). As Atkinson (2007) report additionally clarifies, by utilizing ICT it is workable for the legacy site administration to have the capacity to “customize and tailor shows and encounters to the individual or particular gathering’s needs.” In any case, today the most direct type of live understanding is esteemed to be what includes physical eye to eye connection between the guest and a delegate or gathering of agents specifically included with the legacy site, either on an intentional or utilized premise (Blockley and Hems 2006, p.184), which most analysts distinguish as a mediator. As these creator’s call attention to “eye to eye translation is viewed as the best type of breathing life into the guest encounter” and positively influence them to consider that it is time well spent. One essential perspective should be specified in regard of the activities of the translator. This identifies with their level of ability and level of capability. As Boyd (2003, p.195) clarifies, “While live understanding is considered the best type of connection amongst guest and the legacy protest, low quality in live translation is more awful than nothing.” Be that as it may, how much the “mediator” breathes life into the legacy experience will rely on the scene and its substance. For instance, they can extend from the incorporation of a visit manual for costumed characters who re-sanction the history and culture that the legacy site is advancing. This level of variety and the suitability for the legacy setting will be additionally tended to in the accompanying areas of this examination. Historical centers and Galleries Various inquires about have been directed with the aim of finding how much time guests spent in galleries and to what degree the arrangement and show of the displays affected the length of visit. One such study, led for the examination completed by Boyd (2003, pp.77-78) found that there was a state of time at which guests enthusiasm for the displays started to melt away and the tendency to “set out toward the exit” started to command their manners of thinking. This was particularly observed to be genuine where the elucidation of the shows depended exclusively upon the essential system of show. For instance, except if the guest has a particular chronicled or scholarly enthusiasm for the particular relics being shown inside the scene, which just identifies with a little portion of the populace, sooner or later one display, be that a canvas, vase or another sort of lifeless thing, all started to resemble the other alike to the guest. At that stage the joy and taking in picked up from the experience started to crumble. There still exists the perfectionist see that will contend against the presentation of live understanding includes no place inside exhibition halls and displays. Their thinking is that the guest ought to be permitted to translate the display free from the impact of what the individuals who hold this sentiment see to be outside obstruction. In any case, in spite of the fact that as expressed past this may be applicable for the individuals who have a committed explanation behind going to the exhibition hall or displays it was getting to be clear to the troughs of these settings this was not agreed with by the lion’s share of guests upon whom these historical centers and exhibitions depended. Subsequently, healing and creative activity apparently was required if the decrease in guest numbers was to be switched. It ended up clear that a portion of the key characteristics that guests anticipated that would understanding from survey a specific display were lucidity, strength, engaging quality together with a dynamic introduction (Boyd 2003, p.224). Be that as it may, on account of numerous guests it demonstrated troublesome accomplish the fulfillment of a significant number of these characteristics except if the question or show was fittingly translated in any case. This did not imply that the historical centers and displays needed to present moving or exceptionally intelligent elucidation process for the greater part of their shows. In numerous occasions it was just an issue of presenting a visit direct (Dicks 2003, p.171). This would include utilizing a man who had adequate information and experience about the display to have the capacity to give a suitable interpretati>