1: Evaluate the qualities and skills that promote effective leadership within healthcare organizations.
Explain why one’s leadership qualities and skills are well suited to successfully implementing a strategic plan and sustaining strategic direction.
Competency 2: Apply strategies to lead high-performing health care teams to meet organizational quality and safety goals.
Summarize a strategic plan aimed at achieving the desired quality or safety improvements within a care setting.
Describe the necessary actions for aligning the structure, systems, shared values, management style, staff, and skills of a care setting with strategic goals.
Explain how the implementation and outcomes of a strategic plan will be evaluated against current performance benchmarks.
Competency 3: Apply cultural, ethical, and regulatory considerations to leadership decision making.
Explain how relevant cultural, ethical, and regulatory considerations influence the design of a strategic plan and strategies for its implementation.
Competency 4: Integrate leadership and healthcare theories into the role of the nurse leader.
Explain one’s role, as a nurse leader, in successfully implementing a strategic plan and sustaining strategic direction.
Competency 5: Communicate with stakeholders and constituencies to build collaborative partnerships and create inclusive work environments.
Explain a strategy for communicating with stakeholders and constituencies who are essential to implementing a strategic plan and sustaining strategic direction.
Communicate analyses clearly and in a way that demonstrates professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues.
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Needs to answer the following questions reflect on the current cultural climate in your care setting.
What aspects of the current cultural climate would aid in achieving one or more specific goals contained in your strategic plan?
What aspects of the current cultural climate would present a challenge in achieving one or more specific goals contained in your strategic plan?
What leadership theories, models, or strategies could help you turn this challenge into an opportunity?
Effectively communicating with internal and external stakeholders and constituencies can help in achieving strategic initiatives.
How would you communicate the essential aspects of the strategic plan you developed in Assessment 2 to stakeholders or groups, both internal and external to your care setting?
The following tips will help you create presentation slides that work to your advantage:
Character hypothesis contends that the psyche is indistinguishable to the cerebrum and that psychological occasions are indistinguishable to mind occasions, at last the hypothesis illuminates realism in that everything is physical and to advance accuracy it edifies material monism in trusting that just material substances and their states exist (K. T. Maslin, 2007, 65). To some degree it embodies physicalism that people are completely material creatures that can be clarified utilizing preferably total material science which it is fundamental to call attention to don’t right now exist. The hypothesis in synopsis expresses that when we encounter something in our psyches it will be indistinguishable to an occasion in the mind, for instance torment will be experienced in the meantime as the terminating of c-filaments in the cerebrum (Gareth Southwell, 2009, http://www.philosophyonline.co.uk). In this exposition I will additionally examine the diverse adaptations of the personality hypothesis, for example, type-sort and token-token. Furthermore, I will demonstrate that in spite of qualities, for example, clarifying why changes in the cerebrum through damage or generally go with adjustments in the psychological working no rendition of the personality hypothesis of brain are at last worthy because of its failure to clarify the areas of contemplations or feelings, the intuitive or cognizant states, the qualia of encounters or the purposeful mental states with further evaluate by the American thinker Kripke. There are two kinds of personality hypothesis and the first I will talk about is the sort compose character hypothesis. This hypothesis trusts that any given mental state will be indistinguishable to a cerebrum state (K. T. Maslin, 2009, 68). This hypothesis endeavors to distinguish the association of mental marvels with physical procedures in the cerebrum. This hypothesis uses the disclosures of science as indistinguishable with the conceivable associations of mental states with cerebrum states, it expresses that the revelation of water as a component of oxygen and hydrogen and the recognizable proof of physical marvels, for example, lightning with the example of electrical releases it can interface the experience and feeling of agony with the physical procedure in the mind and focal sensory system of the terminating of C-filaments. The augmentation of this hypothesis places stimulus on reductionism. This is the place it is contended that the implications of various mental and physical expressions precisely coordinate at their center ideas. This can be clarified as far as water and H20, two gatherings of marvels that show up numerically differentiating end up being one arrangement of existents and not two. At last they express that psychological and physical ideas will end up being a solitary sort of property depicted by two distinct phrasings. They trust the genuine idea of marvels can be given by the base to which it is decreased for instance agony can be diminished to the conduct of neurons in the focal sensory system. The second kind of personality hypothesis is the token-token character hypothesis. This accepts there are singular contrasts in individuals and creatures for mind and mental states (K. T. Maslin, 2007, 70). It expresses that while token mental states are indistinguishable to token physical states in various people they might be diverse sorts of states, for instance torment may result in c-fiber incitement in one individual and z-fiber incitement in another (Dr Crawford, 2009, 3). I for one feel that this hypothesis endeavors to clarify the distinctions in people minds in augmentation of the torment precedent I trust this hypothesis attempts to clarify the diverse edge in agony for various people, while despite everything it might be the equivalent mental idea and cerebrum responses it takes a few people more while others less torment to trigger the incitement of their comparing filaments whether it be c, x or y. Right off the bat I will talk about the qualities of these speculations in clarifying that the psyche is eventually the cerebrum. Right off the bat it is a basic hypothesis, with less presumptions and just requiring to clarify the physical it makes itself more ideal and leaves less escape clauses open for evaluate. It likewise evacuates the mind body connection issue, though before there was a necessity to disclose the psychological to physical causation the hypothesis expresses that the psychological is the physical so it just requires the physical to physical causation to be supported and not the non-physical with the physical. Another quality is given by logical revelation in the utilization of PET or MRI checks that demonstrate that particular zones of the mind “illuminate” amid particular mental capacities, a portion of these associations were recognized by Borca and Wernicke over a hundred years previously the formation of these best in class examining strategies, this shows the association among mental and cerebrum states (K. T. Maslin, 2007, 70). Anyway presumably the most intense of all qualities to the personality hypotheses is the capacity to clarify why changes in the cerebrum because of damage, malady, sickness or generally results in the adjustment of mental working. The equivalent occurs along the transformative scale where increments in cerebrum sizes brought about the expansion of scholarly limit. Since the psyche is the cerebrum when the cerebrum is changed the brain is adjusted (K. T. Maslin, 2007, 66). There were some prior protests to this hypothesis too where studies expressed that on the grounds that psychological states are distinctive to mind states diagnostically they should be extraordinary yet scholars immediately expelled this expressing “the non-synonymy of articulations flanking a personality sign does not consequently discount reality of the character guarantee” as it were on account of the articulations or terms are diverse doesn’t implied they can’t in any way, shape or form have a similar character. To take this further the scholars express that everything relies upon what you are alluding to, underneath the diverse vocabulary the actualities identify with a solitary reality. The case of the morning and night stars bolsters this thought while the vocabulary and particularly descriptive words used to portray the star contrast they at last allude to a similar thing the planet Venus. This can likewise be connected to the absence of information as dismissible investigate utilizing Smarts idea expressing that you may think around a certain something however nothing about another doesn’t mean they can’t in any way, shape or form be the equivalent, for instance you may think about water yet not perceive the compound of H20 but rather this doesn’t mean they are not the one and single substance (K. T. Maslin, 2007, 74). The qualities recognized in the aggregate character speculations demonstrate some genuine associations distinguished and supporting proof displayed in demonstrating the psyche is indistinguishable with the mind. Anyway I accept there are some genuine and unparalleled imperfections in the contentions of the character scholars that outcome in its definitive end. Initially, the issue of the psychological and the spatial emerges (K. T. Maslin, 2007, 74). While it is simple using examining, the area of cerebrum procedures can be effortlessly recognized amid different undertakings it is relatively difficult to distinguish the area of an idea or feeling, as it were mental states are distinctive to mind forms.. Furthermore, there is a shortcoming in the association between mental states and mind forms on the subliminal level (K. T. Maslin, 2007, 76), to expand this we imply that things like the normal working of the sensory system and additionally some other framework in your body, for example, absorption or breathing, these all have mind expresses that instruct the body anyway they don’t have any connectable mental state since we don’t consider them in any capacity. This demonstrates a few things just have physical properties and thus not all things have a psychological and a cerebrum state in a general sense contradicting the character hypothesis. Thirdly is the issue of qualia which implies the nature of a cognizant affair (K. T. Maslin, 2007, 79). While we may realize what part of the cerebrum there is action in amid a specific mental state it is highly unlikely we can get to the qualia of that experience, for instance on the off chance that we had an agony we can recognize this by the terminating of c-filaments in our mind state yet it is highly unlikely we could distinguish where that torment is, this implies while we encounter contemplations and sensations they should exist in different structures than simply physical properties of cerebrum states and procedures. One day science might have the capacity to distinguish the qualia of an ordeal however right now we can just recognize the mechanical procedure and can’t clarify mindset or cognizance. Another study of the personality speculations stresses the significance of dreams, convictions, wants and numerous more deliberate states that don’t exist, they have an authentic substance and the scholars trust that mind states are completely mechanical procedures in cerebrum expresses that can’t gangs any illustrative substance, this requires the making of the inference that mind states can’t be indistinguishable with purposeful mental states (K. T. Maslin, 2007, 80). The last primary scrutinize of all character hypotheses is because of Saul Kripke who utilized Descartes 6th intercession as motivation for his contention in expressing that since we can really envision mental states without cerebrum states then they are not indistinguishable by any means, what something may look like isn’t basic to its being nevertheless its inward constitution is for instance something might be an unmistakable fluid in appearance however it might have as much possibility in being vodka as it is water the best way to distinguish it is to diminish it to its internal constitution H20 (K. T. Maslin, 2007, 90 and J. J. C. Brilliant, 2000, http://plato.standford.edu/passages/mind-character). The remote chance of event of mental states without the interfacing mind states implies they can’t be indistinguishable. At last there is a ton of physical to mental methodologies and association that can’t be refuted similarly they can’t be endorsed and this makes the inference that you ‘can’t find reality about reality based on what one does and does not know’ (K. T. Maslin, 2007, 67).>