Write a twelve-page (minimum) paper (exclusive of title page and reference list) based on the following scenario:
Your principal is the corporate CEO of a large software company with international connections in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Central Asia. He travels frequently. He is currently planning a trip to Kabul, Afghanistan to discuss the possibility of establishing business ties with some Afghan software start-up ventures. Your principal will fly to Kabul via commercial airliner. The meeting takes place in Kabul, Afghanistan. Information on Afghanistan is available from the following resources:
Afghanistan — General (Detailed) Information Source: http://afghanistan.saarctourism.org/govemment.html Embassy of the United States — Kabul, Afghanistan: Mtp://kabutusembassy.gov/ See also: http://www.state.gov/r/paki/bgn/5380.htm CIA: The World Factbook — Afghanistan (2010): https://Www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/athtml Centers for Disease Control (CDC) — Afghanistan Information: Mtp://wwwnc.cdc.gov/traveVdestinations/afghanistan.aspx Kabul International Airport (2010 video): Mtp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voRYHfwEStg&feature=related See also: http://lAww.airgorilla.com/airports/asia/afghanistan/kabul-kbl.html Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Intel Report (May 2010): http://kabutosac.gov/Reports/reportcfm?contentID=117797 PMC Tasked with Providing Support In-Country: http://www.isitrainingcenter.com/global-services.html
Detail the various concerns that you have as the protectee’s protective services specialist. You will have a team of two exclusives of yourself. Cover each concern in detail. As a minimum, the following topics must be thoroughly covered:
1. – Threat assessment/risk analysis 2. – Consideration of the principles of protection 3. – Working the principal 4. – The advance 5. – Transport security including bomb search procedures.
Nugent, N. (2003) The Government and Politics of the European Union, Palgrave. Nugent offers an investigation of the European Union in an authentic setting. He contends that a large number of the issues that cynics have a tendency to depend upon as feedback for EU participation were, in themselves, effectively present before the joining of the EU really happened. Numerous pundits expect that the EU has altogether disintegrated and dislodged the power of states. Nugent, be that as it may, sets this happened considerably before, and that combination into the EU can’t exclusively comprise the reason for disintegration of sway in country states. He recommends, in a chronicled examination, that “the part conditions of the EU were seeing their powers being consistently disintegrated some time before the EC/EU was set up” (1), and whatever is left of the book is educated by this view. He contends that the EU assumes just a minor job in dissolving state sway, as more extensive monetary calculates, for example, developments money related markets, multinational organizations and the general symptoms of strength by the U.S. incline toward this model. Truth be told, Nugent recommends that the EU may in actuality help to save self-sufficiency in some ways since it gives a voice, yet one defaced by administration and defilement, that can contend financially with America and the rising China. Nugent takes a gander at the subject of the EU verifiably. He gives a recorded investigation of state relations before the affectation of the EU. In this investigation, he intimates that, while before the war states were strikingly more extraordinary in monetary, social and in political ways, the period after the war flagged a critical move in the manners in which the European states had a tendency to cooperate. The combination of the EU was in this way characterized by these variables, and present reactions about the mind-boggling administrations that work in Brussels only speak to something that is essential. Bache, I and George S (2006) The Politics of the European Union, second Ed., Oxford University Press The Politics of the European Union gives a nitty gritty and far reaching diagram of the agent and dynamic procedures that decide how the EU capacities from everyday. While some verifiable investigation is provided, the center is likewise focussed upon certain key issues in government. The book is part into five discrete areas. The principal area takes a gander at the hypotheses of European incorporation, and basically gives the foundation concerning why European combination should (or shouldn’t) occur, subordinate upon various diverse perspectives. It likewise takes a gander at how the European Union ought to be sorted out dependent on these hypotheses, and takes a gander at manners by which the European Union ought to go later on the off chance that it is to be follower to these specific speculations. Section two takes a gander at the historical backdrop of the European Union, and upon how certain improvements in European governmental issues prompted the coordination of the EU. Section three gives an atomised take a gander at the different part conditions of the EU, with a specific concentration upon Germany, France and Britain. Albeit other part states are specified in a short section, the nonattendance of investigations of other critical nations in the EU, and more nitty gritty examination of Eastern European, Spanish and Scandanavian part states gives the book a specific inclinations toward the past three nations. Section four gives a fascinating examination of how the different establishments of the European Union work, with a concentration upon the stray pieces of the everyday working of arrangement change and execution, as opposed to more definite authentic investigation. At long last, Part 5 takes a gander at how the EU has executed certain arrangements and why, going from its strategies on agribusiness, on the single market, on the financial association and on outside relations. In general, the book gives a decent reading material review of the essential working, reason, and hypothesis behind the EU. Bomberg, E and Stubb A. (2003), The European Union: How Does it Work?, Oxford University Press Once more, The European Union: How Does it Work? gives an intriguing and definite examination of the different manners by which the European Union has come to be what it is, and furthermore centers upon the institutional, hypothetical and chronicled factors that have decided how and why it works. The book is sorted out likewise to the past book, seeing that it concentrates first upon the recorded and hypothetical reason for European Integration, and after that looks in more detail at the different arrangements that have been executed, and the part expresses that go about as players in the EU. Of specific significance is the examination of how part states work inside the intricate system of the EU. Bomberg and Stubb focus upon the complexities of the EU, and attempt to justify the regularly overwhelmingly entangled issues in question, utilizing straightforward intelligent proclamations. They contend that, a long way from being a foundation racked with organization which serves neither the interests of the EU nor the interests of individual expresses, that the components and establishments set up make a progression of balanced governance that permit the sentiment of each member state and political gatherings that work inside these states to work all the more properly. They contend that “What rise as national interests from household frameworks of inclination development stay key to how the EU functions”, and furthermore propose that what is actualized authoritatively is additionally influenced by impressive and refined “level systems administration” in the background. This propensity to take a gander at the real, as opposed to the hypothetical or institutional substances of the EU is a quality of this book, in any case, this characteristically makes the undertaking of the book more equivocal and hard to pinpoint. As opposed to giving a lucid outline of the surfaces of the European Union, the book digs into the complexities and the cumbersome issues that educate and situate choices encompassing arrangement, power and practice. Depict how Politics comes into the Process of European mix The procedure of European reconciliation is an exceptionally intricate one, and if a country state incorporates itself into the complex political field of the European Union, one needs to consider the impacts that this will have upon the given state inside, and remotely. Fundamentally, the joining of European states implies that a given state will take its interests from the local front and into the European Union. As Bomberg and Stubb (2003, p. 70) remark, “once a state joins the Union, legislative issues may start at home however never again end there. National legislative issues, commonwealths, and approaches progress toward becoming ‘Europeanized’.” As such, the externalization of inner pickles that, already were an issue for the sovereign state, now must be considered as a vital, institutional and political entirety. While Nugent contends in The Government and Politics of the European Union that sway was being disintegrated at any rate before the procedures of European reconciliation occurred, the political procedures that worked inside country states to manage issues worried about globalization were most certainly not. A political atmosphere rises during the time spent European coordination because of clashing or consolidated interests that intertwine. Such issues as the mix into the single market, the single European cash, and horticultural approach leveled to keep the plain misuse of free markets and the creation of substandard merchandise. The topic of administration is additionally a complex political one with respect to the EU, and the topic of who oversees sparkles light upon how legislative issues tends to work and turn into a piece of the procedure of European mix. The arrangement procedure of the EU is exceptional in worldwide political undertakings, since it isn’t administered by a focal body, besides, it is represented by a progression of country states Stubb and Bomberg (2003, p. 148) remark that “No state or other worldwide association makes strategies through such an intricate, transnational process in which legislators, authorities, and intrigued bunches from over a landmass interface to shape – now and again to anticipate – shared arrangement results.” As such, legislative issues progresses toward becoming entwined into European reconciliation on account of the melange of interests that work under the umbrella of state, administrative, or political intrigue. Since no state, political or official gathering is in generally speaking control of the strategy making process, governmental issues is basically a piece of European mix since it is through the establishments and the private alcove political wrangling that the European Union makes its general approach and political choices. The political procedure in Europe enters the framework through an assortment of means. While supranational associations have a tendency to affirm political issues, usually left to the part states and chose delegates of these states to lead arrangement dependent on how they might want political advancements to continue. The EU is a case of “organized administration”, and the manners by which the part states, people, weight gatherings and different authorities connect in the EU demonstration to decide in general political strategy. While a lucid political approach dependent on the interests of these states has a tendency to be unwieldy and bureaucratic, this is the means by which legislative issues has a tendency to wind up prompted into the procedure of European mix. By turning into an individual from the European Union, states need to perceive that their own power has been diminished by a political procedure that works inside a more European setting. What are the difficulties confronting European joining today? The EU faces various huge difficulties as it changes to adjust to new monetary, political and supranational variables that decide and real its viability as a political foundation. Right off the bat, the development of the EU presents noteworthy difficulties for both existent part states and those that are new to the European Union. For example, the combination of Eastern Eu>