1. What was the purpose of the test; what did it measure?
2. What were your raw scores, and/or percentile rankings? Highlight close scores or ties, and clear preferences in one direction or another (i.e. exceptionally high or low scores).
3. What do your scores mean? Review the test booklets and handouts distributed in class.
4. Identify which majors and career paths make sense based on your scores? Refer to the handouts from class, or go online for more extensive information (if you use an online source you must include a printout of the information).
5. What is your reaction? What did you learn? Is the information new to you, or did you already know you have these particular preferences? Tell me if your friends, family, co-workers or significant others would agree or disagree with your labels? Reflect on your current and/or past relationships, jobs, experiences, etc. and analyze how they relate to the assessment information gathered?
Through the intuitive oral, I found out about the detainees’ predicament in Plato’s buckle moral story. In the purposeful anecdote, there are detainees, tied, and confronting a divider with a fire behind them. Items are held up, throwing shadows on the dividers. The detainees are just ready to see the anticipated shadows; in this way, the detainees could mix up these shadows for the real world. On the off chance that a detainee were to be discharged and leave the surrender, they would be blinded by the light and understand their blunder. A repeating theme in Sophocles’ Oedipus the King is sight and visual deficiency and this theme is uncovered as the detainees in the purposeful anecdote are reflected by the characters amid their voyage to illumination. Right off the bat, Tiresias, in connection to Plato’s give in moral story, is the person outside of the give in who is all-knowing, understanding the deception of what the detainees see. His insight into in all actuality clear as it is Tiresias who uncovers O>