Write a very good and professional proposal in Iranian literature and Iranian cinema and movies. The most important point is the topic should be related to postmodernism, Memory, Identity /History. kindly write the proposal through the memory, Identity, history and sociology perspective not politic Memory is a key point for me. I’ve selected 4 Iranian novels: 1. Symphony of Dead by Abbas Maroufi 2. The Colonel by Mahmoud dowlatabadi 3. Nocturnal Harmony of Lumbers (wood) 4 the Blind Owl by Sadegh Hedayat The movies which I’ve selected are as follow: 1. Colors of Memory (2008 – Colors of Memory is a 2008 Iranian film directed by Amir-Shahab Razavian based on the events of the 2003 Bam earthquake.
Memory, Identity and history in Iranian novels and movies (literature &amp;amp;amp;amp; cinema )
The flood of humanistic religious philosophy into the instructive framework has offered ascend to impressive strain inside the Christian people group in the ongoing years. Questions have been asked of what humanism is and where it originates from. Humanism is a technique that focuses on the welfare or advancement and satisfaction of all humankind in this by itself and just life. Humanism can be followed back to the seasons of Democritus and Aristotle of Ancient Greece. (Lamont, 1992). Its attach to the Greek culture brought about agnostic highlights, for example, glorification of humankind (Dodgen, 1986, 195).). It is said that the Greek set in regards to acculturating everything. They adapted God, nature and every day life, and it is out of these demonstrations that incredible disapproved of men estimated all things and gave a firm and honorable assortment of guidelines to the human life which came after them (King). The hypothesis of humanism as said has given ascent and impressive strain inside the Christian people group. This conveys out interest to recognize what the announcement of concern is. Well Humanism is a school of imagined that offers power to the investigation of human needs and enthusiasm, for example taking a gander at the hypothesis of Abraham Maslow and his meaning of humanism which says “The focal point of the humanistic viewpoint is on the one self who means, “you” and “your” impression of “your” encounters. This view proposed by Maslow contends that you are allowed to pick “your” very own conduct as opposed to respond to natural improvements or fortifies. This announcement is likewise as opposed to the convictions of operant molding created by the American research clinician Burrhus Frederic Skinner. Skinner trusted that all conduct is the aftereffect of utilization of results. The hypothesis of humanism underscored on confidence in real life. Confidence in real life however not positively. Humanism trains that it is indecent to trust that God will represent us. It underlines that we should act to stop the wars and the violations and the fierceness of ties and future ages. Humanism says we have forces of astounding kind. We have a high level of opportunity in picking what we will do. It discloses to us that whatever our rationality of the world might be, at last the duty regarding the sort of world in which we live in lies with us. This brings the way that the issue of concern is that humanism is a reasoning for the individuals who cherish themselves, a rationality of creative ability and it is engaged upon human’s methods for grasping reality. It doesn’t leave any space for God as the Creator of the universe rather it just depicts God as one who appoints the great or awful that we do. Consequently Humanism causes pressure since it doesn’t save the authenticity of the profound world and God being the god of all things With or without that left the comprehension of humanism winds up significant to the acts of Christian training when one starts to take a gander at the standards of humanistic instruction or instructive humanism. Remember that humanism did not birth in a meeting room, instructive change or administrative act. It has been affected by individuals of various fields. Maybe it is the promotion by the cutting edge or naturalistic humanists that appears to have gotten under the skin of religious pioneers towards humanism, particularly fundamentalist Christians. This is regardless of the way that advanced humanists advocate a strict division of chapel and state, particularly in the space of government funded instruction. At the point when humanism is connected to training it envelops an assortment of suspicions about the instructor, student, educational programs and the setting of learning. There are a considerable measure of standards and every guideline features the comprehension of humanistic training. A portion of the guideline and targets that can be viewed as fundamental seem to be: Instructors ought to trust, earnest and compassionate with their understudies. They should prize their understudies and hold them with high respect. This as proposed via Carl Rogers who reasons that such a state of mind with respect to the learning pioneer would set stage for fruitful encounters and understudies would turn out to be more self tolerating and mindful of themselves. As proposed by Gage and Berliner(1991) there are five goals that an educator must meet which are: advance positive self-course and freedom, build up the capacity to assume liability for what is found out, create inventiveness, create interest and in conclusion make an enthusiasm for human expressions in understudies. This can likewise be known as supporting invitational learning. Emotional components ought to be investigated as much as the subjective measurement of classroom guidance (Beihler, 1986, 399). Research by Bayer (1986) demonstrates that youngsters who are instructed in a climate which is definitive to compelling learning will likewise have a more positive self idea (130-131). The connection between the educator and the understudy has vital effect on the learning procedure. Thomas Gordon (1974) a prominent humanist instructor, depicts a sound educator understudy relationship. He says that the connection between an educator and an understudy is great when it has (1) receptiveness or straightforwardness so each can chance explicitness and trustworthiness with the other, (2) minding whereby each know they are esteemed by the other, and ultimately (3) association on each other. William Purky (1978) point out the connection between an understudy’s self-idea and academic accomplishment and prescribes that teachers create and utilize ability of invitational learning. Such an aptitude as learning understudies names, having one on one contact with them outside of class, applauding and insisting them, exhibiting individual and classroom discipline , and being straightforward with individual inclination will enable the kid to perceive his/her qualities and abilities or in other word impacting self adequacy. That all instructors should dependably remember that learning is encouraged when the understudy is prized, esteemed and regarded by the educator who can mind without being possessive. This is the thing that Abraham Maslow would call advancement of self completion which would push understudies to buckle down. Educators should utilize strategies for urging understudies to relate to other people, underscore with them, and relate their emotions to the sentiment of others. Educators are to embrace self assurance or self direction to make understudies responsible for their activity and decisions. Taking a gander at those standards of humanistic instruction it turns out to be certain that a significant number of them depend on sound standards of training. It would not be hard to refer to scriptural references to exhibit models shape sacred writing where a large number of the standards can be seen. This isn’t to imply that that instructive humanism has its underlying foundations in sacred writing, on the grounds that such an announcement would be founded on flawed strategies for hermeneutics. For somebody who might examine humanism there are a couple of key terms that would enable them to see more about humanism and a big motivator for it with regards to instruction. A portion of these are: Self-efficacyis the degree or quality of one’s faith in one’s very own capacity to finish assignments and reachgoals. This can be viewed as the capacity to endure and a man’s capacity to prevail with an errand. For instance, self-viability specifically identifies with to what extent somebody will adhere to an exercise regimen or an eating regimen. High and low self-adequacy decides if somebody will go up against a testing assignment or discount it as unthinkable. Self-realization Maslow unequivocally characterizes self-completion to be “the longing for self-satisfaction, in particular the inclination for him [the individual] to wind up completed in what he is conceivably. This propensity may be expressed as the longing to end up increasingly what one is, to end up everything that one is fit for getting to be Self-assurance, the procedure by which a man controls their very own life. Invitational learning, William Purky said “no part of training could easily compare to the inclination with respect to the educator that the individual understudy is critical, profitable, and can learn in school” Anyway humanism goes substantially more remote than innovation in its view towards the holy book .the perspective of the humanist is significantly more radical. Humanism puts stock in couple of things that as Christians we may think about them as irreverence. Some of which are; “We accept anyway those custom one sided or tyrant religions that put disclosure, God or statement of faith above human need complete an injury to the human species… … As non-theists; we start with people, not God, nature not god”. As Paul Blanshard, an editorial manager of the Humanist (a smooth national distribution) stated: “The evangelists respectfully call the Bible “The Book”, and they say it is God’s oath. We should be obtuse about it. By no stretch of the creative ability can the book of scriptures be called either the uncovered expression of God or the errorless work of God. It isn’t one book, and it isn’t blessed. It is awful history and even of sketchy ethics… ” Taking a gander at this we see that humanism isn’t uninterested toward the Bible-yet is at hard and fast ward against it. The citations are completely run of the mill and agent of humanistic reasoning toward any divine revelation. The main way Christians can battle their awful and urgent impacts of humanism and its war on the books of scriptures, is by being so educated and familiar with the sacred writings that can adequately use the powerful sword of the Spirit. The pith of positive pride is certainty and satisfaction, a feeling of appreciation and achievement in the gainful utilization of your blessing (Faw, 134-136). There is a need a Biblical point of view of the individual and human encounters with the end goal to accurately comprehend the bits of knowledge contained in specific hypotheses. The certainties about human instinct in sacred writing center generally around our association with God and our requirement for salvation only he can give (Faw, 137). >