Realists of various stripes think that the distribution of power among states is important to explain why and when states go to war. However, Realists disagree on what specific distribution (for example, bipolarity vs. multipolarity; a roughly balanced distribution of power vs. a preponderance of power; a situation of deep and inevitable decline for a powerful state) is more likely to lead to war. Can you identify and explain two (of several possible) Realist arguments about the effects of the distribution of power on the risk of war? Which one do you find more convincing? Why?
English is the dialect of survival in the present skirmish of life .This commonness of English dialect came because of the British colonizing developments beforehand and the present prudent and political intensity of English talking nations that forced themselves and thus forced their dialect on the globe. The exposition will incorporate the reasons for the strength of English on the planet, its part on the planet and in my life and also the negative consequences of this predominance. The present far reaching of the English dialect worldwide is evident from the immense number of its clients which is around 1.8 billion speakers  , and additionally the expanding rate of its students which approaches a billion. This astounding enthusiasm for learning English which can be seen from the gigantic number of its students mirrors the main job it plays in our present reality. This driving job has different angles. For example, the globalized world that English made, presents a method for associating the en>