The history of modern architecture
Relate your firsthand observations of a contemporary building to the history of modern architecture. Find a building in Toronto constructed (or substantially renovated) sometime in the past 10 years. It may be large or small, and need not be designed by a famous architect. It would help, though, if you could locate at least some basic factual information about the building (name of client, year completed, etc). You may not have access to the entire interior, but be sure you can access enough of the building to write an architectural critique. Finally, be sure to select a building that truly interests you!
Write an architectural critique situating a recent building in relation to the history of modern architecture. The essay should be about 1250 words long. Its purpose is not simply to judge the building as good or bad, but more importantly to articulate an attentive and historically informed “reading” of the building.
1.About the description of the building:
The objective is to discover aspects of the design that are not immediately obvious to the casual visitor. You will probably need to look around the space several times, to focus on as many details as possible. Take notes to record your observations.
Questions to consider: What strikes you most about the space? What is its form? Is it regular or irregular? How is it proportioned? Is it possible to identify different regions within the space? Where do people enter, move, stand, or sit, and how is the space design to encourage these behaviours? How are materials used? Are there notable details that contribute to the architectural character? How is the space illuminated, and how does light help to define form and space? Is the ceiling of uniform height, or does it vary? Are there other sensory characteristics that contribute to the building’s spatial order or hierarchy?
2.***About the historical questions of the building:
Going beyond description, the paper should analyze the building’s success as a work of architecture, and should relate it to one or more major themes or questions we have discussed in the course. It should develop a strong thesis statement and support it logically. In offering historical context for the design, be sure to make appropriate use of concepts, vocabulary words, and historical precedents discussed in class. If you cite sources (such as news reports, books, and academic journal articles), be sure to include footnotes formatted according to Chicago Manual of Style guidelines.
Historical questions to consider: When was the building designed, and who commissioned it? What design approaches and architectural values does the building reflect? How would you classify its style, using vocabulary we have discussed in class? Is there anything that makes it unusual or noteworthy within this stylistic category? What historical factors might have led to the adoption of these design features? How do form and material affect the ways in which people approach or use the building? How does the building reflect its function or social context? How does it relate to its urban surroundings?
Include a few illustrations to support your argument. Self-drawn sketches and diagrams are especially encouraged. Your own carefully composed photographs, as well as high-quality plan and section drawings reproduced from library books, may also be used. Choose illustrations carefully to support your argument: only include images to which you make direct reference. Quality and relevance of illustrations will be evaluated in marking the paper.The sketches matters to the assignment,be sure that the illustrations supports your arguments.
Here are the criterion of this assignment ,please read it carefully.
1.Observation Quality of observation in writing and sketches ;
2.Analysis Analytic depth of writing and sketches;
3.Historical Awareness Application of historical ideas,methods,vocabulary;
4.Images Quality and relevance of illustrations;
5.Technique Ability to write well and develop a critical thesis