There are 2 parts to the exam: PART ONE: Short essay questions. Choose one choreographer from the list in Question #1 to write about. Next. choose four other quest-questions. Note that you MUST answer question #1, choosing one choreographer to write about. Please choose and answer This makes a total of FIVE questions.Please number the questions in Part One. CHOOSE ONE CHOREOGRAPHER FROM THE LISTING QUESTION #1 –
1 These-choreographers have made very important contributions to dance. Identify what dance form they worked in (ballet, r company), describe their style, and discuss their contribution to dance: George Balanchine Isadora Duncan Martha Graham Alvin Ailey Jerome Robbin (I have already chose Isadora Duncan for this question.)
CHOOSE FOUR QUESTIONS TO DISCUSS FROM QUESTIONS #2 to #6 -2. As people move and migrate,whether by choice or by force (slavery), they bring their traditions, including dance, with the had a profound effect on dance and music in our New World cultures. Discuss some of the ways these enslaved Africans in social dances,martial arts or religious rituals they contributed.
3. Dance evolves in cycles between innovation (change) and tradition. Discuss 3 examples of tradition in dance when dance examples of innovation (change) when new ways of dancing or new styles made a break from the dance of the time. Who (innovations in dance forms or styles related to social change or historical forces? How? .
5. Compare and contrast ballet and modern dance. Include at least four similarities and 4 differences between the 2 forms. (‘ Graham or Doris Humphrey in contrasting modern dance and ballet.)
6. Discuss the impact of technology on dance. How have photography, film, television,computers and recorded music Chang dance? Do you think this is positive or negative? Why?
PART Two Performance Response in the Describe/Analyze/Interpret format. Make sure that your Describe section is detailed, complete of the response in part two:”Describe”, “Analyze”, and “Interpret.” DANCE OBSERVATION/ DESCRIPTION: View the dances in these video links. Choose one to write about:
Choice 1 –
Choice 2 —
Describe the dance using our format-Describe — How does the dance use space, time and energy? Where is the dance taking place? How many dancers are pert dance designed in space? How does the music and rhythm relate to the dance? What movement qualities do you observe —thrusting, twisting? What is the sequence of the action in the dance? Analyze — What seems most important in this dance?What patterns do you notice? Does it tell a story, have characters or e: Is the dance abstract – simply -about’ the movement itself? Interpret — What do you think the dance is expressing? What is the choreographer “saying- in the dance? What connections
IMPORTANT NOTE – The writing in this final must be in your own words.You may use the textbook, your notes, or a website to write about are in the textbook.) want to read what you understand from the class in your own writing.
The convergence of humanistic religious philosophy into the instructive framework has offered ascend to impressive pressure inside the Christian people group in the ongoing years. Questions have been asked of what humanism is and where it originates from. Humanism is a system that focuses on the welfare or advancement and satisfaction of all mankind in this by itself and just life. Humanism can be followed back to the seasons of Democritus and Aristotle of Ancient Greece. (Lamont, 1992). Its attach to the Greek culture brought about agnostic highlights, for example, glorification of humanity (Dodgen, 1986, 195).). It is said that the Greek set regarding adapting everything. They refined God, nature and day by day life, and it is out of these demonstrations that incredible disapproved of men estimated all things and gave a firm and honorable group of guidelines to the human life which came after them (King). The hypothesis of humanism as said has given ascent and extensive strain inside the Christian people group. This conveys out interest to recognize what the announcement of concern is. Well Humanism is a school of felt that offers power to the investigation of human needs and enthusiasm, for example taking a gander at the hypothesis of Abraham Maslow and his meaning of humanism which says “The focal point of the humanistic viewpoint is on the one self who means, “you” and “your” impression of “your” encounters. This view proposed by Maslow contends that you are allowed to pick “your” very own conduct as opposed to respond to natural upgrades or strengthens. This announcement is additionally rather than the convictions of operant molding created by the American research analyst Burrhus Frederic Skinner. Skinner trusted that all conduct is the aftereffect of utilization of outcomes. The hypothesis of humanism stressed on confidence in real life. Confidence in real life yet not positively. Humanism encourages that it is shameless to trust that God will represent us. It accentuates that we should act to stop the wars and the violations and the fierceness of ties and future ages. Humanism says we have forces of surprising kind. We have a high level of opportunity in picking what we will do. It discloses to us that whatever our rationality of the world might be, eventually the obligation regarding the sort of world in which we live in lies with us. This brings the way that the issue of concern is that humanism is a logic for the individuals who adore themselves, a rationality of creative energy and it is engaged upon human’s methods for fathoming reality. It doesn’t leave any space for God as the Creator of the universe rather it just depicts God as one who appoints the great or terrible that we do. Consequently Humanism causes pressure since it doesn’t safeguard the authenticity of the otherworldly world and God being the divinity of all things With or without that left the comprehension of humanism winds up important to the acts of Christian training when one starts to take a gander at the standards of humanistic instruction or instructive humanism. Remember that humanism did not birth in a meeting room, instructive change or administrative act. It has been affected by individuals of various fields. Maybe it is the backing by the cutting edge or naturalistic humanists that appears to have gotten under the skin of religious pioneers towards humanism, particularly fundamentalist Christians. This is regardless of the way that cutting edge humanists advocate a strict partition of chapel and state, particularly in the space of government funded training. At the point when humanism is connected to training it envelops an assortment of presumptions about the educator, student, educational modules and the setting of learning. There are a great deal of standards and every guideline features the comprehension of humanistic instruction. A portion of the guideline and destinations that can be viewed as essential seem to be: Instructors ought to trust, genuine and sympathetic with their understudies. They should prize their understudies and hold them with high respect. This as proposed via Carl Rogers who infers that such a demeanor with respect to the learning pioneer would set stage for effective encounters and understudies would turn out to be progressively self tolerating and mindful of themselves. As proposed by Gage and Berliner(1991) there are five targets that an instructor must meet which are: advance positive self-bearing and freedom, build up the capacity to assume liability for what is found out, create imagination, create interest and ultimately make an enthusiasm for expressions of the human experience in understudies. This can likewise be known as supporting invitational learning. Emotional variables ought to be investigated as much as the subjective element of classroom guidance (Beihler, 1986, 399). Research by Bayer (1986) demonstrates that kids who are educated in an air which is decisive to powerful learning will likewise have an increasingly positive self idea (130-131). The connection between the instructor and the student has critical effect on the learning procedure. Thomas Gordon (1974) a prominent humanist instructor, depicts a sound educator understudy relationship. He says that the connection between an educator and an understudy is great when it has (1) receptiveness or straightforwardness so each can hazard certainty and trustworthiness with the other, (2) minding whereby each realize they are esteemed by the other, and finally (3) association on each other. William Purky (1978) point out the connection between an understudy’s self-idea and academic accomplishment and suggests that teachers create and use aptitude of invitational learning. Such an ability as learning understudies names, having one on one contact with them outside of class, commending and attesting them, exhibiting individual and classroom discipline , and being straightforward with individual inclination will enable the youngster to perceive his/her qualities and capacities or in other word impacting self viability. That all educators should dependably remember that learning is encouraged when the understudy is prized, esteemed and regarded by the instructor who can mind without being possessive. This is the thing that Abraham Maslow would call advancement of self realization which would push understudies to buckle down. Educators should utilize procedures for urging understudies to relate to other people, underline with them, and relate their emotions to the sentiment of others. Educators are to embrace self assurance or self direction to make understudies responsible for their activity and decisions. Taking a gander at those standards of humanistic instruction it turns out to be evident that a large number of them depend on sound standards of training. It would not be hard to refer to scriptural references to show models frame sacred writing where a significant number of the standards can be seen. This isn’t to imply that that instructive humanism has its underlying foundations in sacred writing, in light of the fact that such an announcement would be founded on flawed techniques for hermeneutics. For somebody who might examine humanism there are a couple of key terms that would enable them to see increasingly about humanism and a big motivator for it with regards to instruction. A portion of these are: Self-efficacyis the degree or quality of one’s confidence in one’s very own capacity to finish assignments and reachgoals. This can be viewed as the capacity to persevere and an individual’s capacity to prevail with an undertaking. For instance, self-adequacy specifically identifies with to what extent somebody will adhere to an exercise routine or an eating regimen. High and low self-viability decides if somebody will go up against a testing undertaking or discount it as inconceivable. Self-completion Maslow unequivocally characterizes self-realization to be “the longing for self-satisfaction, to be specific the propensity for him [the individual] to wind up realized in what he is conceivably. This inclination may be stated as the longing to wind up increasingly more what one is, to end up everything that one is equipped for getting to be Self-assurance, the procedure by which an individual controls their own life. Invitational learning, William Purky said “no part of instruction could easily compare to the inclination with respect to the educator that the individual understudy is critical, important, and can learn in school” Anyway humanism goes a lot more remote than innovation in its view towards the holy book .the perspective of the humanist is substantially more radical. Humanism trusts in couple of things that as Christians we may think about them as irreverence. Some of which are; “We accept anyway those convention stubborn or dictator religions that put disclosure, God or belief above human need complete a damage to the human species… … As non-theists; we start with people, not God, nature not god”. As Paul Blanshard, an editorial manager of the Humanist (a smooth national production) expressed: “The evangelists respectfully call the Bible “The Book”, and they say it is God’s assertion. We should be obtuse about it. By no stretch of the creative energy can the book of scriptures be called either the uncovered expression of God or the errorless work of God. It isn’t one book, and it isn’t blessed. It is awful history and even of sketchy ethics… ” Taking a gander at this we see that humanism isn’t aloof toward the Bible-yet is at hard and fast ward against it. The citations are completely average and delegate of humanistic reasoning toward any divine revelation. The main way Christians can battle their horrendous and urgent impacts of humanism and its war on the books of scriptures, is by being so proficient and familiar with the sacred texts that can adequately use the strong sword of the Spirit. The substance of positive pride is certainty and satisfaction, a feeling of appreciation and achievement in the gainful utilization of your blessing (Faw, 134-136). There is a need a Biblical point of view of the individual and human encounters so as to accurately comprehend the bits of knowledge contained in specific speculations. The certainties about human instinct in sacred text center to a great extent around our association with God and our requirement for salvation only he can give (Faw, 137). A Christian who ruminates upon the expression of the ruler and keeps in his heart will have no trouble seeing the huge prevalence of Christianity over humanism or>