Your Signature Assignment is your opportunity to combine what you have learned throughout this class and to show how you meet the learning outcomes of your program.
Select a population with a health disparity. Describe the factors that contribute to the disparity: cultural, environmental, religious, etc. What systems are in place to remedy this situation? Design a health promotion program that addresses solutions to the disparity in a culturally competent way. What barriers will be faced by the population? What barriers will be faced by the public health professionals? What systems will need to be in place to ensure appropriate utilization? Your paper should be five to seven pages in length (excluding cover page and reference page). Use APA (6th ed.) format to style your paper and to cite your sources. Integrate your sources into the paragraphs and use internal citations pointing to evidence in the literature and supporting your ideas. You will need to include a reference page listing those sources.
In the light of Romans, 1 Corinthians and Galatians, what wellsprings of power does Paul attract on to strengthen his case and what can be gained from the witness in this regard for contemporary church administration? Following his change making a course for Damascus, where Paul of Tarsus, once persecutor of the devotees of Jesus met with the risen Lord, he turned into the best protector of the recently framing Christian confidence. His enthusiasm and intensity once so receptive to freeing the universe of this apparent danger to Judaism presently swung to advancing the equivalent. Nonetheless, such was his emotional and groundbreaking gathering with Jesus, that Paul not just given his life to developing and sustaining early Christian houses of worship, and spreading the gospel over the Mediterranean and past, yet was ready to continue mistreatment and in reality affliction himself in the quest for his heavenly mission. It is generally held that Paul was remarkably prepared for this mission as he had huge numbers of the characteristics required for such a tremendous undertaking. In this paper, I will see Paul’s adventure from persecutor to convert, a voyage that took him a huge number of miles and one that expected him to declare his message with conviction and specialist. Paul would need to guard his lessons and the gospel he announced in many changed and regularly troublesome circumstances. To do this he utilized an assortment of sources, for instance, when Paul shields his biblical status or difficulties careless good conduct or supporters his gospel message he draws on his change understanding, the Hebrew Scriptures, his finely sharpened and brilliant explanatory expertise, and resulting power of contention, to fortify his case. At long last, I will take a gander at how his authority abilities and techniques may give us an understanding into contemporary church initiative today. Let us first take a gander at Pauls’ biblical specialist. There is no uncertainty that Paul professed to be a messenger, and he absolutely practiced specialist, however when he did would he have asserted this to be as a missionary? He would not especially have guaranteed that his power originated from his arrangement as a messenger, however there are times when in shielding his status he asserts his biblical position. In the initial two sections of Galatians and in the letters to Corinth Paul fervently shields the situation of being a missionary. In Galatians, some had contended that since he was not one of the first messengers designated by Jesus he is some way or another second rate compared to them, yet more significantly as substandard compared to Peter. Obviously, this is at the core of the discussion over apostleship. Paul’s reaction to this was angry, he was enraged with the old educators who scrutinized his power and attempted to tie up the Christians with the old laws. However, he was much increasingly incensed with the Christians for capitulating to their terrorizing. Paul starts his letter with a solid and clear record of how his bonus isn’t by vote of man, yet undeniable. He keeps on expressing how once James, Peter and John have perceived this they shake hands with him and Barnabus and dole out them to a service with the non-Jews, while they proceed with the Jews. He is expressing here likewise that even as he reproaches Peter for specific practices that he supposes are out of line, Peter perceives his power and correspondence with himself. In 1 Corinthians 9.1; 15.8-11 Paul declares his entitlement to be incorporated as a witness. He had after all observed the risen Christ, and the mission work he was doing with the Corinthians authenticated his position (1 Cor.9.1-2) Am I not free? Am I not a messenger? Have I not seen Jesus our Lord? Are you not the aftereffect of my work in the Lord?2 Even however I may not be a messenger to other people, doubtlessly I am to you! For you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord. Yet, this case isn’t one that Paul continually alludes to. He in reality just professes to be a witness in Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians and Galatians. In both Corinth and Galatia some denied that he was a missionary so it is here in his letters to them that he dispatches his protection. In any case, in Romans he talks from the beginning just like a witness maybe on the grounds that having never by and by visited these places of worship he needs them to be obvious from the start that the gospel he announces is on a similar standing and has indistinguishable specialist behind it from that declared by Peter and the twelve. He doesn’t anyway need to protect his situation as much in Rome as he does in Corinth and Galatia. But instead he delicately reminds in Rom 11.13: 13 I am conversing with you Gentiles. In as much as I am the witness to the Gentiles, I take pride in my service. It is obvious from this that Paul just along these lines guarantees his apostleship when this has been raised doubt about by others, and not on the premise that he needs this expert so as to be an observer to the gospel. Paul’s self-affirmed expert originates from God himself by means of Jesus the Son. Paul asserts this has originated from his street to Damascus vision of Christ, and all things considered he trusts that he talks legitimately as one the Lord trusts. For instance, when addressing the Corinthians regarding the matter of marriage (1 Cor 7.25) 25 Now about virgins: I have no order from the Lord, however I give a judgment as one who by the Lord’s kindness is dependable. In spite of the fact that he does now and again specifically talk about the Lord’s lessons; as while educating about the correct route for the Lord’s dinner to be observed (1Cor 9.14), 23 For I got from the Lord what I likewise passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night he was double-crossed, took bread, he doesn’t frequently utilize the expressions of Jesus yet guarantees that his position comes specifically from the Lord e.g.,”for developing not tearing down” (13.10). Scuhz1 contends that Authority is the elucidation of intensity and for Paul that power would be the gospel He asserts that what makes Paul so definitive is his capacity to translate the gospel. This demonstration of elucidation opens the wellspring of intensity in the gospel and subsequently makes that control available to the individuals who react in trust and compliance to it. Paul’s capacity to be a vessel of this capacity to individuals is the thing that sets up his biblical expert. Since the gospel has both an underlying and continuous errand to achieve in the network, Paul’s position reaches out past the underlying acknowledgment of the gospel and well into the complexities of the networks regular structures, examples and practices. His entitlement to address the networks he established emerges out of the central power which they both have encountered, the gospel that he the two mirrors in his background and which he lectures. The limitation on missional specialist has its grapple in the nature and significance of that equivalent gospel. Power through shortcoming. No self absorbed or tyrant style for Paul. His position and authority are educated, formed and managed by the confusing substance of the gospel he lectures. see I Cor 1:18ff Reference index Dunn, James D G (ed), The Cambridge Companion to St Paul (Cambridge: CUP, 2003), particularly the expositions in Part 3. Outfit, Victor Paul, Theology and Ethics in Paul (Nashville: Abingdon, 1968). Longenecker, Richard (ed), The Road from Damascus: The Impact of Paul’s Conversion on His Life, Thought, and Ministry (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1997). Malherbe, Abraham J, Paul and the Popular Philosophers (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2006). Sampley, J Paul, Walking between the Times: Paul’s Moral Reasoning (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991). Kim, Sayoon, Paul and the New Perspective: Second Thoughts on the Origin of Paul’s Gospel (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002).>