1. An explanation of the threats and risks in Blue Cross Blue Shield Massachusetts in terms of the H1N1 pandemic. Describe their vulnerabilities and what might be the impacts to BCBSMA and stakeholders if services were disrupted. As a leader, explain how you might use strategic planning and contingency planning processes to prepare for such a crisis in the future. 2. Collect information and data regarding the external environment that Blue Cross Blue Shield may be operating in within the next 5 years, explain what he major risks are to the organization and how you would use contingency planning to be prepared for such activities.
Presentation Counterfeiting or scholarly deceitfulness as it is normally known is a wild bad habit among understudies which is submitted both purposefully and unexpectedly (Maureen and Joyce 2006). There is a developing worry about the expanding dimensions of copyright infringement among understudies who are either too apathetic to even consider doing their assignments or are swinging to doing bunch work and after that turning assignments as their unique work. Diverse types of literary theft exist which to genuinely new understudies in school might be very difficult to ace. For example replicating from web sources without giving credit, rewording of other individuals’ work and not recognizing the first creator and the most widely recognized one is whereby understudies neglect to refer to notwithstanding when they have referenced their work (Plagiarism Statement 2006). My situation on this issue is that literary theft ought to be debilitated utilizing the most grounded and enforceable terms conceivable. The initial step is to give a F in the specific task or test and after that continue to reassign the test again yet first ensuring that the understudy comprehends what counterfeiting is and why the person is rehashing the task. To ensure that the understudy is not kidding with work, the conceivable all out imprints that can be granted in the second endeavor of the paper is 70% and not a hundred so as to make the understudy to work more enthusiastically. Over re-trying the work once more, the understudy engaged with literary theft ought to show up before an uncommonly comprised leading group of staff individuals in the bureau of the understudy and furthermore the guardians ought to be available (Jack and Michelle 2009). Disappointment of following the above strategy by the understudy will prompt disappointment in the course and in this way no graduation for such an understudy. This stand may appear to be cruel yet it is the main method for reducing a culture that is undermining to slaughter advancement and creativity among our future researchers. In the field of research, inventiveness of thoughts is empowered in spite of the fact that those thoughts must be from earlier comparative work which somebody set aside a ton of opportunity to accumulate and affirmation would be all together. It would likewise esteem to be out of line as a mentor to grant imprints to all understudies on a similar scale thinking about that some have done their fair work and turned it on time though others have taken an easy route and replicated from their companions at the last time to abstain from bombing in the paper (Jack and Michelle 2009). There has been a mushrooming of numerous web destinations that have custom composed papers which an understudy can download an exposition for a significant over the top expense so as to abstain from doing the task. This pattern pits understudies from rich foundations who can bear to purchase expertly composed papers so as to out do their partners against different understudies who depend distressfully on their characteristic capacities to look into. Over the long haul, a few understudies may pass not in light of their characteristic capacities and astuteness but rather on the grounds that they utilized easy routes (Maureen and Joyce 2006). Some employees and instructors have contended that discipline that is doled on understudies on account of literary theft is now and then outrageous and impacts contrarily on the lives of understudies who may here and there be suspended for a long time. As indicated by an article showing up in The Daily Princetonian, upwards of ten understudies were approached to leave the Princeton University for a long time on different charges of copyright infringement. What’s more, twenty two understudies were slapped with suspensions and ejections while the degrees of different understudies were retained by the college (Jack and Michelle 2009). The majority of the discipline is viewed as draconian and uncalled for which isn’t the situation particularly when there are unmistakably sketched out punishments for counterfeiting which are accessible to each understudy in school. To counter this, numerous individuals contend that copyright infringement is in numerous structures which should convey distinctive punishments and not a saw as equivalent (Plagiarism Statement 2006). While there might be distinctive types of written falsification, most importantly everything sums to counterfeiting and it ought to be dealt with the equivalent. The main thing that may make contrast in punishment is whether it is a first time offense or a rehashed offense. The punishments are likewise given as well as a board of trustees sits downs and passes the sentence dependent on allowable proof of copyright infringement, set down controls and their mastery on such issues (Maureen and Joyce 2006). End There is no other method to demonstrate the reality of managing written falsification other than to give out solid punishments on wrongdoers so as to dishearten the bad habit in our future researchers. In any case, contemplations can be made on to what type of written falsification on the grounds that there are normally instances of missteps and understudies wind up paying seriously. To maintain a strategic distance from the punishments that surface with literary theft, understudies need to ensure that they recognize their sources regardless of whether they have summarized the first idea, cut or duplicate sticking of material from the web isn’t a choice and all materials that is refered to ought to be inside the reference and the reference materials ought to be refered to inside your work. Work refered to Jack Ackerman and Michelle Wu. Doling Out Discipline. 29th April, 2009. 24 August 2009, Maureen Dawson and Joyce Overfileld. Copyright infringement: Do understudies know what it is? 18 July 2006. 24 August 2009, ‘Copyright infringement Statement’. Association County Public Schools Graduation Project Implementation Guide. 23 Jan, 2006. 24 August 2009.>