What should Alex Franklin do and why? In formulating your answer, you have three colleagues to persuade that you are suggesting the right thing. Unfortunately, they each have their own favorite approach and you’ll need to make a balanced argument to each. Kent is partial to deontology (particularly Kant), Ah likes Aristotle’s virtue ethics, and Melinda finds utilitarianism most effective. Argue whether Alex should open the folder or not, making a unique argument for each one of your colleagues. Pick yes or no and keep consistent in your answer across the first three questions. You cannot change your stance across colleagues, only your justification. In other words. if you argue yes to Kent, you must also argue yes to Ari and Melinda. Or vice versa. you could argue no to all three colleagues. In making your argument, focus on the reasoning of your answer rather than the tactics of your plan.
determine irrationality of a suicide if there was no way possible of the individual knowing; it can only be judged if there was no attempt to get it from reliable sources (Battin 137-138). I think that Battin is inferring that not having the correct information could mean they are unable to participate in rational thought process. Another assumption of suicide not being rational due to this criterion is caused by internal factors, such as depression where they can unknowingly suppress certain information (Brandt, cited in Battin 1995, 138). She counters this by stating that you can still have adequate information because the future may be already negative, even with a smaller view (Battin 138-139). Therefore, from her counterargument, she is countering any claims of narrow views that the opposition would try to argue by stating that an individual’s health status does not matter. Battin states that some would claim that suicide would be irrational if one committed it because of an unlikely future, but states t>