Understanding how our role in Performance Psychology is one that fosters intrinsic motivation and personal action, how will you balance developing a clientele base(client cultivation) while also adhering to the principles of creating independence and possibly having a client evolve to a point where they may no longer need to work with you?
Chapter 5, Conclusion and Recommendation draws conclusions and suggests some implications basing on the results in previous chapter. LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL BACKGROUND Literature Review Discourse Analysis (DA) is a modern linguistic discipline that covers a wide variety of different fields. Discourse analysis examines language in use both written texts of all kinds and spoken data from conversation to highly institutionalized forms of talk. Analysis of discourse looks not only at the basic level of what is said, but takes into consideration the contexts which it is used. Thus, discourse analysis not only study language use “beyond the sentence boundar”, but also analyze ‘naturally occurring’ language use. It means that discourse analysis is one of the aspects which attract the interest of many linguists and researchers all over the world. Under the heading of discourse analysis, there have been a lot of studies dealing with a wide range of its subfields such as coherence, cohesion, context, conversation analysis, information structure, speech act theory and theme-rhyme. Up to present, many foreign scholars including Halliday and Hasan , Brown and Yule , Cook , Hatch , Nunan … have made great contributions to the field in different approaches and methods. These publications focused on one or another aspect of discourse analysis theory which gave us an overall picture of theoretical background to examine how language is in use. In Vietnam, many linguists have made great contributions to the study of discourse analysis. Tran Ngoc Them  has investigated in detail cohesion in Vietnamese texts with “Há»‡ thá»‘ng liên káº¿t vÄƒn báº£n Tiáº¿ng Viá»‡t and VÄƒn báº£n và Liên káº¿t trong Tiáº¿ng Viá»‡t“. Nguyen Duc Dan  and Nguyen Thien Giap  studied discourse analysis from a pragmatic view. Diep Quang Ban  has given an overall view of text and utterance especially above the sentence level. Nguyen Hoa with “Nghiên cá»©u diá»…n ngôn vá» chính trá»‹ – xã há»™i”  and more recently Nguyen Hoa with “Phân tích diá»…n ngôn phê bình” . Besides, there have been a number of master theses dealing with political speeches including: Le Thi Hoang Van  made an investigation into Linguistic Features of Antithesis in Political Speeches in English and Vietnamese. In this research, she investigated argumentation power of antithesis and stylistic features of rhetorical devices in antithesis in English political speeches and Vietnamese political speeches. Pham Khac Thu  did a research on Modality Markers Used in Political Speeches by US Presidents. The author investigated a wide range of modal expressions used in all the inaugural speeches of the US presidents. Nguyen Thi Hanh  investigated into the structure of Theme – Rheme in English and Vietnamese political speeches. The study focuses on the structure of Theme – Rheme in English and Vietnamese political speeches in terms of characteristics, semantic and pragmatic aspects.>