Read the “Beck Manufacturing” case study in Chapter 8 of your text. In a three- to four-page paper, address the following:
• Calculate the capacity of each machine center and the capacity of the system.
• Analyze where the focus of the company’s efforts should be if Beck wants to expand capacity. Determine how much extra capacity he can get without causing another operation to become the bottleneck.
• Suggest ways Beck can expand capacity without purchasing new equipment.
Your paper should be in paragraph form (avoid the use of bullet points) and supported with the concepts outlined in your text and additional scholarly sources.
Submit your three- to four-page paper (not including the title and reference pages). Your paper must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center and must cite at least three scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Grading Rubric

Description:

Total Possible Score: 7.00
Calculates the Capacities of Each Machine Center and the System
Total: 1.15
Distinguished – Accurately calculates the capacities of each machine center and the capacity of the system.
Proficient – Calculates the capacities of each machine center and the capacity of the system. Some inaccuracies are present.
Basic – Calculates the capacities of each machine center and the capacity of the system. Many inaccuracies are present.
Below Expectations – Attempts to calculate the capacities of each machine center and the capacity of the system; however, significant inaccuracies are present.
Non-Performance – The calculations are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Analyzes the Focus of the Company’s Efforts and Determines the Capacity of the Expansion
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly analyzes the focus of the company’s efforts and accurately determines the capacity without causing another bottleneck. Expertly applies course concepts and vocabulary from the text and/or additional scholarly sources.
Proficient – Analyzes the focus of the company’s efforts and determines the capacity without causing another bottleneck. Sufficiently applies course concepts and vocabulary from the text and/or additional scholarly sources.
Basic – Vaguely analyzes the focus of the company’s efforts and partially determines the capacity without causing another bottleneck. Minimally applies course concepts and vocabulary from the text and/or additional scholarly sources.
Below Expectations – Attempts to analyze the focus of the company’s efforts and to determine the capacity without causing another bottleneck; however, course concepts and vocabulary from the text and/or additional scholarly sources are not applied.
Non-Performance – The analysis of the focus of the company’s efforts and the determination of the capacity without causing another bottleneck are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Suggest Ways for Capacity Expansion Without the Purchase of New Equipment
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Suggests several reasonable and realistic ways Mr. Beck can expand capacity without purchasing new equipment.
Proficient – Suggests some reasonable ways Mr. Beck can expand capacity without purchasing new equipment. The suggestions are slightly underdeveloped.
Basic – Suggests a few reasonable ways Mr. Beck can expand capacity without purchasing new equipment. The suggestions are underdeveloped.
Below Expectations – Attempts to suggest ways Mr. Beck can expand capacity without purchasing new equipment; however, the suggestions are not entirely reasonable and/or are significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance – The suggested ways to expand capacity without purchasing new equipment are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
Proficient – Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.
Basic – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.
Below Expectations – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Creative Thinking: Solving Problems
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Develops a logical, consistent plan to solve a problem, identifies consequences of the solution, and can clearly communicate the reason for choosing the solution.
Proficient – Carefully chooses among alternatives, and develops a logical, consistent approach to problem solving.
Basic – Takes into account and eliminates less acceptable approaches to problem solving.
Below Expectations – Takes into account a single approach and uses the approach to problem solving.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Content Development
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive content to discover and develop sophisticated ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Proficient – Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Basic – Uses appropriate and pertinent content, but does not apply it toward discovering or developing ideas. Overall, content assists in shaping the written work.
Below Expectations – Uses content, though it may be unrelated or inappropriate to the topic. Content does not contribute toward the development of the written work, and may distract the reader from its purpose.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Integrative Learning: Connections to Discipline
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Autonomously synthesizes or draws conclusions by combining examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.
Proficient – Autonomously correlates examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.
Basic – Attempts to correlate examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.
Below Expectations – When prompted, displays inconsistent examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.15
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.15
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.15
Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Source Requirement
Total: 0.40
Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient – Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations – Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Case study :

Beck Manufacturing
Al Beck, president of Beck manufacturing, wants to determine the capacity of his facility, which produces steering gears for auto manufacturers.He has asked you to sort through the data and determine the capacity of the system and how that capacity may be increased. The operation isa product layout that produces large numbers of nearly identical products. The process includes milling, grinding, boring, drilling, andassembling, in that order. Each finished product requires one operation on each type of machine. For example, each finished part is processedon one of the five milling machines, one of the seven grinding machines, etc.
The facility runs two 8-hour shifts per day, with a third shift for maintenance. The industrial engineering department has provided you with thefollowing data on present operations. In addition, you have been told that assembly operations, while not unlimited, can be easily changed tomeet the need.
Operation Number ofMachines Run Time per Piece (min.) % Reject Rate
Milling 5 2 3
Grinding 7 3 5
Boring 3 1 2
Drilling 6 2.5 7
1. Calculate the capacity of each machine center and the capacity of the system.
2. If Beck wants to expand capacity, where should he focus the company’s efforts? How much extra capacity can he get without causing another operation to become the bottleneck?
3. How may Mr. Beck expand capacity without purchasing new equipment? Be specific.

Sample Solution

Share on Facebook

Tweet

Follow us