No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees


  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

BODY SIZE | How You See Me

Each of us has a unique perspective on the world around us and on ourselves. Likewise, each of us has something about our ‘physical’ selves that we are not completely satisfied with which could limit our perspective or hinder the power of our own first-person narrative. Often, we will try to hide that part of our physical selves which means our narrative is not fully complete. Please watch the video called Body Size which gives fresh insights into one of the types of body image challenges.

How does point of view play a role in the personal narratives of those in the video? Could their stories have been told as effectively from a third person perspective? Defend your position.
Review the Unit 4 Learning Content on literary terms. Find and discuss one literary or poetic term that you found demonstrated within the video.
In your view, do body size issues rob the broader human community of valuable insights and perspectives? How might we combat the problem?
In a separate paragraph, describe a ‘body image’ experience you had (size, height, beards, tattoos, etc.) where you felt unaccepted. Use any of the five ‘point of view perspectives’ found in the Unit 4 Learning Content to briefly share your personal narrative.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Sample Solution

ld do battle or not alongside conditions which should be thought of, how would it be a good idea for us we respond and not do during a conflict in the event that it is unavoidable, lastly what further move ought to be made later. To assess this hypothesis, one should take a gander at the suspicions made towards it, for instance, entertainers which scholars forget about and the delay between customary scholars and innovators. In particular, there can be no conclusive hypothesis of the simply war, on the grounds that everyone has an alternate understanding of this hypothesis, given its normativity. Notwithstanding, the hypothesis gives an unpleasant presentation of how we ought to continue in the midst of pressure and struggle, critically the point of a simply war: 'harmony and security of the republic' (Begby et al, 2006b, Page 310). Generally, this hypothesis is reasonable to utilize yet can't at any point be viewed as a characteristic aide since it's normatively hypothesized. To respond to the inquiry, the article is involved 3 areas. Jus promotion bellum The beginning segment covers jus promotion bellum, the circumstances discussing whether an activity is legitimately OK to cause a conflict (Frowe (2011), Page 50). First and foremost, Vittola talks about one of the noble motivations of war, in particular, is when mischief is caused yet he causes notice the damage doesn't prompt conflict, it relies upon the degree or proportionality, one more condition to jus promotion bellum (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314). Frowe, be that as it may, contends the possibility of "worthy motivation" in light of "Sway" which alludes to the security of political and regional privileges, alongside common liberties. In contemporary view, this view is more confounded to reply, given the ascent of globalization. Additionally, it is hard to gauge proportionality, especially in war, on the grounds that not just that there is an epistemic issue in computing, yet again the present world has created (Frowe (2011), Page 54-6). Moreover, Vittola contends war is fundamental, not just for guarded purposes, 'since it is legal to oppose force with force,' yet in addition to battle against the treacherous, a hostile conflict, countries which are not rebuffed for acting unfairly towards its own kin or have unreasonably taken land from the home country (Begby et al (2006b), Page 310&313); to "show its foes a thing or two," yet essentially to accomplish the point of war. This approves Aristotle's contention: 'there should be battle for harmony (Aristotle (1996), Page 187). Nonetheless, Frowe contends "self-protection" has a majority of portrayals, found in Chapter 1, demonstrating the way that self-preservation can't necessarily legitimize one's activities. Significantly more tricky, is the situation of self-preservation in war, where two clashing perspectives are laid out: The Collectivists, an entirely different hypothesis and the Individualists, the continuation of the homegrown hypothesis of self-protection (Frowe (2011), Page 9& 29-34). All the more significantly, Frowe discredits Vittola's view on retribution on the grounds that first and foremost it engages the punisher's power, yet additionally the present world forestalls this activity between nations through legitimate bodies like the UN, since we have modernized into a somewhat tranquil society (

Price Calculator

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Total Cost:

12% Discount


  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us


  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments