Personal Moral Theory

Read/review the following resources for this activity:
• Textbook: Chapter 13
• Lesson
• Narrated PowerPoint Tutorial (Make sure to review this tutorial before you begin recording.)
Introduction
In this session, you have been considering moral-ethical dilemmas you yourself faced or that you know of that you either resolved or failed to resolve, but hopefully learned from. You may never have given much thought to ethical theory nor what ethical premises/paradigms you have unconsciously held.
You will be focusing on this case for this assignment:
Jane Doe is a nursing student at University X. Jane is in week eight of a course entitled: “Introduction to Ethics”.
For the week one discussion, Jane copied work done by her friend John Doe in the same class two months ago (with a different professor). John told Jane it was okay to use his work as John’s professor never checked any work in the class using Turnitin.com. John claimed to have earned an A on the work also.
In week two, Jane went to StudentPapering.com and paid ten dollars for a week two essay done by a student (not John Doe) who took the same course four months ago. StudentPapering promises that all its archived work is of excellent quality and cannot be detected as copied. Jane then uploaded an exact copy of the work for the week two assignment.
In week three, Jane paid a worker at PaperingStudent.com ten dollars to write for Jane a brand new essay after Jane shared with the worker the essay assignment instructions.

In week four, Jane relied on her knowledge of Esperanto. She felt pressed for time and found an article by a professor from Esperanto on the week four topic. She translated Esperanto into English using Moogle Translate, and the translated text served as her week four paper.
In week five, Jane was running late again. Jane purposely uploaded a blank paper hoping that she would later claim it was an innocent mistake and not be assessed a late penalty. In a previous course on History, she had done the same (with an earlier paper from the History class rather than simply a blank) and had not seen any late penalty assessed.

In week six, Jane took work she did in a nursing course from a year ago and submitted that for her discussion posting in her current class. She simply copied and pasted the work she had labored intensively on a year ago (even though University X forbids this practice as ‘self-plagiarism’). Jane was confident her Nursing instructor never checked that work using Turnitin.com or another method.

In week seven, Jane copied and pasted work found on website.com for the paper. Jane did not use any quotation marks or other documentation to show the text was not by Jane.
Since Jane’s Ethics professor did not check papers and posting for any issues by using Turnitin.com or another method, the professor graded all of Jane’s work unaware of Jane’s actions throughout the weeks of the class. Jane feels her actions are morally justified both because her economic situation requires her to work too much to devote time to school (although other students are well-off enough to have such time) and her religion forbids cheating, but Jane ignores her religion’s teachings.
Instructions
Now that you have had an opportunity to explore ethics formally, create a reflective assessment of your learning experience and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. You will submit both of the following:
• A written reflection
• An oral presentation using a PowerPoint narrated slide show.
For the written reflection, address Jane Doe’s and respond to the following:
• Articulate again your moral theory from week eight discussion (You can revise it if you wish). What two ethical theories best apply to it? Why those two?
• Apply to Jane Doe’s case your personal moral philosophy as developed in week eight discussion and now. Use it to determine if what Jane Doe did was ethical or unethical per your own moral philosophy.
• Consider if some of these examples are more grave instances of ethical transgressions than others. Explain.
• Propose a course of social action and a solution by using the ethics of egoism, utilitarianism, the “veil of ignorance” method, deontological principles, and/or a theory of justice to deal with students like Jane. Consider social values such as those concerning ways of life while appraising the interests of diverse populations (for instance, those of differing religions and economic status).
For the oral presentation, briefly summarize your feelings about taking a course in Ethics and explore your process of transformation in this course.
• Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings, and where you are now. Consider your interaction in discussions.
• Should health care workers be required to take a course in Ethics? Why or why not

Sample Solution

Theory and design

The first project involves modifying the attached lexical analyzer and the compilation listing generator code. You need to make the following modifications to the lexical analyzer, scanner.l:

  1. A new token ARROW should be added for the two character punctuation symbol =>.
  2. The following reserved words should be added:

case, else, endcase, endif, if, others, real, then, when

Each reserved words should be a separate token. The token name should be the same as the lexeme, but in all upper case.

  1. Two additional logical operators should be added. The lexeme for the first should be or and its token should be OROP. The second logical operator added should be not and its token should be NOTOP.
  2. Five relational operators should be added. They are =, /=, >, >= and <=. All of the lexemes should be represented by the single token RELOP.
  3. One additional lexeme should be added for the ADDOP token. It is binary -.
  4. One additional lexeme should be added for the MULOP token. It is/.
  5. A new token REMOP should be added for the remainder operator. Its lexeme should be rem.
  6. A new token EXPOP should be added for the exponentiation operator. Its lexeme should be **.
  7. A second type of comment should be added that begins with // and ends with the end of line. As with the existing comment, no token should be returned.
  8. The definition for the identifiers should be modified so that underscores can be included, however, consecutive underscores, leading and trailing underscores should not be permitted.
  9. A real literal token should be added. It should begin with a sequence of one or more digits following by a decimal point followed by zero or more additional digits. It may optionally end with an exponent. If present, the exponent should begin with an e or E, followed by an optional plus or minus sign followed by one or more digits. The token should be named REAL_LITERAL.
  10. A Boolean literal token should be added. It should have two lexemes, which are true and false. The token should be named BOOL_LITERAL.

You must also modify the header file tokens.h to include each the new tokens mentioned above.

The compilation listing generator code should be modified as follows:

  1. The lastLine function should be modified to compute the total number of errors. If any errors occurred the number of lexical, syntactic and semantic errors should be displayed.

If no errors occurred, it should display Compiled Successfully. It should return the total number of errors.

  1. The appendError function should be modified to count the number of lexical, syntactic and semantic errors. The error message passed to it should be added to a queue of messages that occurred on that line.
  2. The displayErrors function should be modified to display all the error messages that have occurred on the previous line and then clear the queue of messages.

An example of the output of a program with no lexical errors is shown below:

1 (* Program with no errors *)

2

3 function test1 returns boolean;

4 begin

5 7 + 2 > 6 and 8 = 5 * (7 – 4);

6 end;

Compiled Successfully

Here is the required output for a program that contains more than one lexical error on the same line:

1 — Function with two lexical errors

2

3 function test2 returns integer;

4 begin

5 7 $ 2 ^ (2 + 4);

Lexical Error, Invalid Character $

Lexical Error, Invalid Character ^

6 end;

Lexical Errors 2

Syntax Errors 0

Semantic Errors 0

You are to submit two files.

  1. The first is a .zip file that contains all the source code for the project. The .zip file should contain the flex input file, which should be a .l file, all .cc and .h files and a makefile that builds the project.
  2. The second is a Word document (PDF or RTF is also acceptable) that contains the documentation for the project, which should include the following:

a. A discussion of how you approached the project

b. A test plan that includes test cases that you have created indicating what aspects of the program each one is testing and a screen shot of your compiler run on that test case

Sample Solution

Person-Centered Theory

Explain the followung theories;

Psychoanalytic Theory
Adlerian Theory
Behavioural Theory
Cognitive-Behavioural Theory
Control Theory/Reality Therapy
Existential Theory
Person-Centered Theory
Gestalt Theory
Feminist Theory
Family Systems Theory
Multicultural Theory

Sample Solution

Teaching Theories and Models

You have become a reflective practitioner with a repertoire of tools to help you reflect on your teaching. At this point, much thought has been put into how you teach, even the methods you informally and even formally utilize on a regular basis. Taking the sum of the knowledge garnered thus far, it is time to specifically and formally utilize a teaching method based in theory. The idea is to explicitly bring theory into practice to make that often-fleeting connection, more concrete.

Apply a theory-based teaching method into a daily class lesson, which clearly demonstrates a formally incorporated teaching method based in theory. Record this lesson. Then review the recording and reflect in your reflective journal/blog specifically on the method utilized. Describe the method, detail its execution, and assess your effectiveness via the blog post. Incorporate the readings for this week and any thus far into the journal. The purpose is to review the method, assess it, and determine what went well, and what could be better.

Sample Solution

Concepts and theories

Analyze the concepts and theories you read about in S301; utilizing key language and terms from these concepts and theories, write a 825-word paper on the challenges of talent management and how a Sergeant Major (SGM) can engage organizational members for competitive success in future assignments while ensuring their organizational members remain adaptable. Ensure to use good APA 7th Edition writing style, list the references used, and cite them within the paper. Use only active voice! ———————break——————— This assessment targets the following ELO (S301: Human Resources in the Workforce). According to Army Doctrine leader development must foster the cognitive, social, and physical competencies associated with the human dimension. War fundamentally remains a human contest of wills, despite the advances in technology. Producing a professional Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) corps demands a comprehensive Human Dimension Strategy oriented on the individual, the team, and the institution. The roles and responsibilities for the NCO have always been to lead, train, and care for Soldiers and equipment while enforcing standards. The Army must have a cohort of competent and committed NCOs of character as trusted professionals who thrive in chaos, adapt, and win in a complex world. The Army’s NCO 2020 Strategy provides the ways, means, and ends to develop a professional, trained, and ready NCO corps that is essential to remain as the world’s premier fighting force. Leader development is f​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​urther enhanced by recognizing, developing, and maturing talents in Soldiers while simultaneously managing talent to meet the immediate and long-term goals of the ALDS. Together, leader development and talent management build on the fundamentals. Talent is the intersection of three dimensions—skills, knowledge, and behaviors—that create an optimal level of individual performance, provided individuals are employed within their talent set. Talent management is a way to enhance Army readiness by maximizing the potential of the Army’s greatest asset—our people. By better understanding the talent of the workforce and the talent necessary to meet capability needs by unit

Sample Solution

Connection that identifies specific knowledge and theories

At UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong educational programs and courses that allow them to be servant-leaders in their disciplines and communities, linking research with practice and knowledge with ethical decision-making. This assignment is a written assignment where students will demonstrate how this course research has connected and put into practice within their own career.

Provide a reflection of at least 500 words (or 2 pages double spaced) of how the knowledge, skills, or theories of this course have been applied, or could be applied, in a practical manner to your current work environment. If you are not currently working, share times when you have or could observe these theories and knowledge could be applied to an employment opportunity in your field of study.

Share a personal connection that identifies specific knowledge and theories from this course.

Demonstrate a connection to your current work environment. If you are not employed, demonstrate a connection to your desired work environment.

Sample Solution

Person-Centered Theory

Explain the followung theories;

Psychoanalytic Theory
Adlerian Theory
Behavioural Theory
Cognitive-Behavioural Theory
Control Theory/Reality Therapy
Existential Theory
Person-Centered Theory
Gestalt Theory
Feminist Theory
Family Systems Theory
Multicultural Theory

Sample Solution