No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees


  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

CJ Research Methods

S​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​cenario: The Andrews County Adult Probation Department is developing a new treatment center for men who have been convicted two or more times for domestic violence in the past three years and are currently on probation for a family violence offense. The center is planning to open in May 2023. The center will provide treatment to repeat domestic violence offenders on an outpatient basis. Offenders assigned to the center are required to meet with center staff three times a week for 3 months. The center provides individual counseling, family counseling, along with other treatment services. Once the offender completes the treatment provided by the center, the offender remains on probation for 6 months and then the probation order is terminated and the person is released from community supervision. A committee of probation officers is responsible for the development of the center. By assessing prior records, the committee has found that there are currently 572 people who are currently on probation for a family violence offense who meet the parameters established for the program (i.e., have been convicted two or more times for domestic violence in the past three years). The committee expects that they will be able to provide services to 100 of the 572 offenders during the first year of operation. The committee expects the program to reduce the number of arrests for domestic vi​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​olence for those who participate in the treatment as well as reduce the number of calls for service to the addresses of the participants for disturbances and other incidents that may be related to domestic violence (e.g., noise complaints, harassment complaints, and disorderly conduct complaints). The committee has hired you to evaluate the program. i will upload an outline of how the paper should be typed out and also textbook material to be use and cited throughout the paper. Above is the scenario to use and be applied to answer the questions. Please based outline attached to the scenario given. Use the scenario I have also uploaded pages out of my textbook that should be used to answer outline . *Maxfield and Babbie (2015) Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology Threats to internal validity . Please list three that may impact the study and list what you will do if the threat is encountered . I have uploaded a list of threats to internal validity from the Creswell and Creswell (2018) book called “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. It lists all of them and ways they can be taken care of if encountered If outside sources are to be used , they will need to come from academic sources Lastly , regarding the sample size. Larger sample size are better . At the very least, have a sample size of n=​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​121

Sample Solution

o anything but go around torturing strangers. Such a possibility seems heavily counterintuitive. A theist might naturally say that God would never do such a thing, yet, simply the unlikelihood of such a state of affairs materialising seems a fairly unconvincing retort. Of course, one could point to an omnipotent God as responsible for those intuitions and accordingly, we could assume that were he to take such a course of action he must be doing it for some higher purpose beyond our comprehension. It’s important to note here that God’s benevolence and omniscience must be our motives for following him. As Williams notes, “if it is his power, or the mere fact that he created us, analogies with human kings or fathers […] leave us with the recognition that there are many kings and fathers who ought not to be obeyed”3 (Morality – An Introduction to Ethics, B. Williams, Chapter 8, p. 63). Indeed, an all-powerful ruler who created everything is not necessarily more worthy of obedience but simply harder to disobey. This benevolence, stemming from God’s omniscience, presents a pitfall for the first hornist. For, while God’s willing of acts making them moral maintains his omnipotence, it removes the sense of compassion, care and love that God has thus limiting him in another way. If whatever is willed is good, then God’s goodness is determined by his own submission to his will. However, this undermines the good of God himself, his nature. Having a will that arbitrarily legislates things as universally good seems more like the profile of a tyrant rather than a prudent, loving God, yet since whatever he wills is good, his goodness is also subject to his own arbitrary commands. Of course, the theist will respond that the commands of the all-loving and all-powerful are not arbitrary or in any way like a tyrant but the problem is how one explains this when there is no criteria by which to judge him, since all his commands are good. Liebniz argued that in saying things are not good by any rule of goodness, but simply by God’s will, “one destroys all the love of God and all his glory”. Indeed, praising God and his actions seems a hollow concept if he would be equally praiseworthy for doing the opposite. Thus “this opinion would hardly distinguish God from the devil”, as God’s goodness is dismissed, making it impossible to explain the difference between an omnibenevolent God and an omnipotent sadist. As Lewis puts it, “if good is to be defined as what God commands, then the goodness of God Himself is emptied of meaning and the commands of an omnipotent fiend would have the same claim on us as those of the ‘righteous Lord’”. The idea is that what makes God good is his omniscience and that what he wills is well-considered and prudent, but something cannot be prudent if there are no values on which to decide what to command, and therefore God’s commands are necessarily arbitrary. An attitude towards God which insists on his following because that is what we ‘ought’ to do, would seem in the way Kant insisted to be making morality prior to God.

Price Calculator

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Total Cost:

12% Discount


  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us


  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments