No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees


  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Debate Schedule

· One person needs to be responsible for recording the Zoom Debate

· To create breakout rooms> there are 3 dots on the lower menu next to reactions.

· Press the 3 dots and click create breakout rooms.

· You can assign yourself to the breakout room or have the host put you in the breakout room

· Have your sources and information in front of you- you will need it for the rebuttal.

· Be taking notes of what your opponent said during the opening statement to prepare for your rebuttal.

1) Pro stance will go first with an opening statement (5 minutes per team)

a. Each partner will have an opening statement

2) Anti-stance will go with their opening statement (5 minutes per team)

a. Each partner will have an opening statement

3) Partners will then go to their breakout room (5 minutes per team)

a. This is where you will plan your rebuttal.

b. Each partner will come up with a rebuttal

c. When done- meet back in the big zoom room

d. When each group has returned Pro stance will go first

4) Pro stance will state their rebuttal (5 minutes per team)

a. Each partner will have a rebuttal

5) Anti-stance will go (5 minutes per team)

6) Partners will be coming up with their closing statement while the other team is going

7) Once the last team has gone

a. Pro stance gives closing statements (5 minutes – each partner must have one)

b. Anti stance gives closing statement (5 minutes -each partner must go)

8) When finished, upload the video to the assignments tab.

Sample Solution

this paper I will examine the associations between authority, inspiration and cooperation hypotheses, how they interface with training in associations and their constraints, offering arrangements where difficulties emerge. The article plans to reach inferences on the reasonableness of Fiedler's Contingency Theory of Leadership, Tuckman's Model of Group Development, Belbin's Team Theory, and Herzberg's Two Factor Theory practically speaking, and how intricacies like power and impact shape how they can be applied to best suit what is happening a pioneer faces. Authority Contingency based speculations of initiative propose that there is no right or most ideal way to lead a gathering, or association, because of the huge number of requirements on a circumstance (Flinsch-Rodriguez, 2019). Fiedler, in his Contingency Theory of Leadership (Fiedler, 1967), proposes that the adequacy of a gathering is subject to the initiative styles of the pioneer and their favourability to everything going on. A significant part of the hypothesis is laid out around the most un-favored associate scale (LPC). The LPC expects to measure a potential chiefs way to deal with an errand on a size of relationship spurred to task propelled, where the pioneer fits on the scale permits what is happening to be reasoned, and hence permits the recognizable proof of appropriate pioneers for assignments. The favourableness of the present circumstance relies upon three qualities: pioneer part relations, the help and trust the pioneer as from the gathering; task structure, the clearness of the undertaking to the pioneer; and positional power, the power the pioneer needs to survey a gatherings execution and give prizes and disciplines (Fiedler, 1967). On the off chance that the pioneers approach matches what is expected from going on, achievement is anticipated for the gathering. Fiedler's possibility model offers an exceptionally grave categorisation of administration, obviously characterizing which circumstances endlessly won't bring about progress for an expected pioneer. At the senior administration level of a hierarchal design inside an association the hypothesis can be applied unreservedly, first and foremost because of the simplicity at which people can be supplanted on the off chance that their LPC score doesn't match that expected of everything going on (Pettinger, 2007). Furthermore, and in particular, is to guarantee that the senior administration are ideally suited to effectively lead the association. Nonetheless, further down the order Fielder's possibility hypothesis starts to hold substantially less importance, it becomes unreasonable according to an authoritative point of view because of the quantity of individuals at this degree of administration. The strategies of coordinating the pioneer with their most un-favored associate is difficult to reliably accomplish, so a more continuum based approach is required. Figure 1: Chelladurai's Multi-Dimensional Model of Leadership (Miller and Cronin, 2012)

Price Calculator

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Total Cost:

12% Discount


  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us


  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments