No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees


  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

El Rinche

In El Rinche: The Ghost Ranger of the Rio Grande, Christopher Carmona reconstructs how the Texas Rangers brutalized and killed Mexican Tejana/o families in order to assist Anglos in power who desired agricultural development in South Texas. Although this book is a work of fiction, it nonetheless provides an important window into how Mexican Tejanas/os sought to hold on to their lands in the late 1800s and early 1900s.
Assignment: You are required to write an 900 to 1,000 word book essay on El Rinche. For this essay, you should not provide a mere summary of the book. Rather, you are required to provide your critical analysis by answering five reading response essay questions. An effective reading response essay demonstrates that you have a deep understanding of the reading and have substantiated your critical analysis by providing quotes and details from the book. You can only use the book to answer the questions below. Any use of outside sources will result in a zero.
Your essay should be in Times New Roman, 12 point font, double-spaced, and 1” margins. You do not need a cover page. Your first page would have your name, the date, and the title of the assignment at the top left corner.
All quotes should be cited using MLA, or parenthetical references: (Carmona 19).
Essay Structure:
To effectively answer each question below, provide a paragraph that has details from the book as well as two to three quotes from the book that you analyze to support your response to the question. You should not merely provide quotes, but rather, analyze these quotes and tell me how these quotes answer the essay question. In total, you will have five paragraphs. You do not need an introduction nor conclusion.

  1. What different methods did the Texas Rangers use in order to push Mexican Tejanas/os off their land? ALSO, how did they get the assistance of people who were not Texas Rangers in order to push Mexican Tejanas/os off their land?
  2. How did the character El Rinche empower Mexican Tejanas/os to resist the Texas Rangers? Also, why did Mexican Tejanas/os create a legend and a corrido (song) about El Rinche?
  3. Why did a Mexican Tejano, an African American, a Native American, and a Japanese
    American come together to resist the Texas Rangers? ALSO, how were African Americans, Native Americans, and Japanese Americans each treated in South Texas by the Anglos in power and the Texas Rangers? You should tell me how each group was treated.
  4. What parts of the book did you like the most, and why?
  5. If you were a Mexican Tejana/o who owned land in South Texas, would you have resisted the Texas Rangers? If so, explain why. If not, explain why not. You should make sure to include and analyze two to three quotes when answering this question, as you did for the other four questions.
    Purpose: This book essay allows you to gain mastery in the student learning outcome of analyzing the effects of historical, social, political, economic, cultural, and global forces on this period of United States history.
    Your essay will be evaluated for how well you answer the questions by providing details
    from the book for each question, having SHORT analyzed quotes that support your critical
    analysis for each question, the length, and grammatical as well as spelling errors. The use
    of any outside sources will result in an F. You can only use on the book to answer the five questions.

Sample Solution

Vittola talks about one of the noble motivations of war, in particular, is when damage is caused yet he causes notice the damage doesn't prompt conflict, it relies upon the degree or proportionality, one more condition to jus promotion bellum (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314). Frowe, in any case, contends the possibility of "worthy motivation" in view of "Power" which alludes to the security of political and regional freedoms, alongside common liberties. In contemporary view, this view is more muddled to reply, given the ascent of globalization. Also, it is hard to quantify proportionality, especially in war, in light of the fact that not just that there is an epistemic issue in working out, yet again the present world has created (Frowe (2011), Page 54-6). Besides, Vittola contends war is important, not just for protective purposes, 'since it is legitimate to oppose force with force,' yet additionally to battle against the uncalled for, a hostile conflict, countries which are not rebuffed for acting unfairly towards its own kin or have unreasonably taken land from the home country (Begby et al (2006b), Page 310&313); to "show its foes a thing or two," yet predominantly to accomplish the point of war. This approves Aristotle's contention: 'there should be battle for harmony (Aristotle (1996), Page 187). Nonetheless, Frowe contends "self-preservation" has a majority of portrayals, found in Chapter 1, demonstrating the way that self-protection can't necessarily in all cases legitimize one's activities. Significantly more hazardous, is the situation of self-preservation in war, where two clashing perspectives are laid out: The Collectivists, an entirely different hypothesis and the Individualists, the continuation of the homegrown hypothesis of self-protection (Frowe (2011), Page 9& 29-34). All the more significantly, Frowe disproves Vittola's view on retribution on the grounds that first and foremost it enables the punisher's power, yet additionally the present world forestalls this activity between nations through legitimate bodies like the UN, since we have modernized into a somewhat quiet society (Frowe (2011), Page 80-1). Above all, Frowe further discredits Vittola through his case that 'right expectation can't be blamed so as to take up arms in light of expected wrong,' recommending we can't simply hurt another in light of the fact that they have accomplished something low. Different elements should be thought of, for instance, Proportionality. Thirdly, Vittola contends that war ought to be stayed away from (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332) and that we ought to continue conditions strategically. This is upheld by the "final retreat" position in Frowe, where war ought not be allowed except if all actions to look for discretion comes up short (Frowe (2011), Page 62). This implies war ought not be pronounced until one party must choose the option to proclaim battle, to safeguard its terr

Price Calculator

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Total Cost:

12% Discount


  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us


  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments