CRT has spread beyond the confines of private studies to many other fields, especially women’s and gender studies, education, American studies, and sociology (Curry, T. (2016). CRT spin-off movements formed by Asian Americans and by Latinos also have taken hold. The Latino critical concept appeared as an organized group in 1995 and is now a forceful movement in CRT scholarship and activism (Curry, T. (2016). Despite the relatively recent appearance of CRT in academia, some scholars have found it a valuable view on race and racism in America. CRT found what lots of race scholars now take as a commonsense view. CRT scholars hold that the laws and laws in the United States are biased against people of color, and they have focused their scholarship on showing the ways that the authorized institutions support that bias (Curry, T. (2016). Although there is still some types of segregation within the school system, it has a different face. Most of the curriculum taught within the school’s system is catered towards more middle-class students compared to working-class students, which is unfair. A lot of working-class students have reportedly lower reading and writing skills, along with larger class sizes and a substantial amount of behavioral issues within their schools. Whereas, the middle-class students have reportedly higher reading and writing skills, along with smaller class sizes and a lack of behavioral issues within their schools. The issues lie in the fact that wealthier areas are able to provide more resources, teachers, and materials for their students compared to the working class areas.>