No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Evaluating and Synthesizing (The Thomas Crown Affair)

Evaluating and Synthesizing (The Thomas Crown Affair): 5th ed. updateThomas Crown-a billionaire Manhattan financier and part-time thiefCatherine Banning-the insurance investigator hired to retrieve the MonetMichael McCann & Paretti-detectives assigned to the case of the stolen Monet; McCann disapproves of Banning’s methods for ensnaring CrownAnna-Crown’s companionKnutzhorn-an imprisoned art forgerer who, as McCann discovers, previously owned art galleries with Crown“San Giorgio Maggiore Soleil Couchant”-the Monet painting that Crown has stolen“Son of Man”-the Magritte painting which features a businessman whose face is covered by a green appleChoose either one of the following topics or thematically combine the 2 and write a well-organized 3-5 pp. paper with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.-Make sure that the specific point that you are making is highlighted in a thesis statement (your thesis should be the last sentence of the intro).-Make sure that the point being made in each body paragraph is clear. Remember: Analyze ratherthan summarize. Examine the meaning behind specific scenes as well as the characters’ motives to prove your point. Avoid long stretches in your essay where you are merely recounting the movie’s plot.-Properly cite any of the authors that you use and if you are using their words, remember to use quotation marks (Use the MLA format for citing sources; consult the related Norton chapters on MLA format).-Include a “works cited” page listing the Charles Taylor review, the film, and the Bordo essay from Ways of Reading (and other sources if used).1.In “Beauty (Re)discovers the Male Body,” Susan Bordo focuses on how men are or have been presented in the media, making a point about sexuality and its relationship with gender and even culture: how traditional roles are developed and whether or not they are being maintained in contemporary society. What would Bordo say about how masculine and feminine roles are constructed in TheThomasCrown Affair, a film brimming with not only elegance, sexuality, and luxury but the mind games individuals enjoy engaging in?Is the message conveyed in the film regarding gender or social class ultimately healthy/unhealthy/positive/negative? Does it seem to be reinforcing or reinventingstereotypes? Based on such criteria should the product be recommended or not?-For development in your individual body paragraphs, you should make connections between the film’s presentation of men and women and issues that Bordo addresses such as the following: “the gaze, the shame, and the other”; the presentation of fashion and sexuality; Berger’s theory that “men act and women appear.”
2.Susan Bordo references John Berger’s point about gender representation in “Beauty (Re)discovers the Male Body.” In an essay not mentioned by Bordo,“Ways of Seeing,” Berger examines how the upper class use art to separate society socially and economically. Similar in spirit, in “Beauty (Re)discovers,” Susan Bordo addresses the relationship between gender identity and socioeconomic class addressing how the criteria for defining masculinity has changed throughout history (157-60). While The Thomas Crown Affair presents the life of a wealthy tycoon and avid art aficionado, what is the film’s attitude towards the relationship between gender identity and socioeconomic class? Analyze the correlation between art, wealth, and gender in the film and the characterizations and motives of Crown and Banning to flesh out your argument.Is the message conveyed in the film regarding gender or socioeconomic class ultimately healthy/unhealthy/positive/negative? Does it seem to be reinforcing or reinventing stereotypes? Based on such criteria should the product be recommended or not?Remember, the main objectives here are twofold: Evaluate and recommend (or not) a product for a specific audience. Again, is the messageconveyed in the film regarding gender or social class ultimately healthy/unhealthy/positive/negative? Does it seem to be reinforcing or reinventing stereotypes? Based on such criteria should the product be recommended or not?Synthesize secondary sources, such as the Bordo reading, to deepen the evaluation of the primary source (the film).

Sample Solution

activities. It is worth mentioning that the 2004 Act combined the two issues (tissue retention and organ donation). The issue related to organ donation was not affected by the Bristol and Alder Hey scandals. So, the 2004 Act has been criticized by the academics and professionals for this reason. Taskforce and recommendations More than 14 million people were on the NHS Organ Donation Register in 2006-07. The doctors performed 3,000 transplants; however, the doctors could not save 1,000 people as they were on the waiting list for the transplants. The governed showed its concern regarding this matter and authorized the UK Organ Donation Task Force to carry out an investigation in this regard. The Task Force, in its report proposed to increase the number of organ donation by 50 percent at the end of 2013. However, this goal was not achieved by the stipulated time. The Task Force made 14 recommendations which include: setting up a UK-wide organ donation organization ; resolving outstanding legal, ethical and professional issues ; dedicated organ retrieval team should be established ; developing the formal guidelines for organ donation . It is worth mentioning that the recommendations did not mention anything with regard to the change in opt-in system. The Task Force published a report on the possible impact of introducing an opt-out system for organ donation in the UK in 2010. In the report it was stated that the need to change in the opt-in system for organ donation is a finely balanced question and the current system is unable to do enough against the need of public. The report revealed that almost 60% people will support the opt-out system provided that the system would protect the rights of the vulnerable people. According to the report published by the Task Force in 2010, the change in the opt-in system would be able to bring certain benefits; however, it fears that there could be a detrimental effect on the health system, it emphasized on “the potential to damage the vital relationship of trust between clinicians caring for people at the end of life, their patients and their families.” The Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013 Before implementing the 2013 (Wales) Act, there had been extensive research with regard to the impact of opt-out laws. The efficiency of the opt-out laws was considered around the world. Particular emphasized on the Europe was given. Moreover, opinion from the public was assed and this is an important consideration before adopting the new legislation. The Welsh government came out with the conclusion that adopting a soft opt-out system
PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Price Calculator

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost:

12% Discount

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments