No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature Table

E​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​vidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature Table The purpose of this assignment is to provide research evidence in support of the PICOT you developed for your selected topic. Conduct a search for 10 peer-reviewed, translational research articles published within the last 5 years that demonstrate support for your PICOT. You may include previous research articles from assignments completed in this course. Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” provided to evaluate the articles and explain how the research supports your PICOT. Once your instructor returns this assignment, review the feedback and make any revisions necessary. If you are directed by your instructor to select different articles in order to meet the assignment criteria or to better support your PICOT, make these changes accordingly. You will use the literature evaluated in this assignment for all subsequent assignments you develop as part of your evidence-based practice project proposal in this course and in NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal. Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature Table – Rubric No of Criteria: 11 Achievement Levels: 5 Criteria Achievement Levels DescriptionPercentage Unsatisfactory 0.00 % Less Than Satisfactory 80.00 % Satisfactory 88.00 % Good 92.00 % Excellent 100.00 % Content 100.0 PICOT 5.0 The PICOT is omitted. NA NA NA The PICOT is clearly and accurately presented. Articles 10.0 Required number of sources are not included. Article citations and permalinks are omitted. Number of required sources is only partially met. Article citations and permalinks are presented. One or more links do not lead to the intended article. Number of required sources is met, but some sources are outdated or inappropriate. Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented, but there are errors. Sources are current and generally appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented, but there are minor errors. Sources are current and highly appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are accurate. Research Question, Hypothesis, Purpose or Aim of Study 10.0 Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for one or more articles is omitted. Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is presented, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is adequately presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A discussion on the research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study is thoroughly and accurately presented for each article. Study Design 10.0 The study design for one or more article is omitted. The study design for each article is presented, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. The study design is indicated for each article. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. The study design is adequately presented for each article. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and accurate discussion on the study design for each article is presented. Setting and Sample 10.0 The setting and sample are omitted for one or more of the articles. The setting and sample are indicated for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. The setting and sample are indicated for each article. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. The setting and sample are adequately presented for each article. Minor detail is neede​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​d for accuracy or clarity. The setting and sample in which the researcher conducted the study are detailed and accurate for each article. Methods 10.0 Method of study for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the methods of study are incomplete. The method of study is presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. The method of study for each article is presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies An adequate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and accurate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. Analysis and Data Collection 10.0 Analysis and data collection for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the analysis and data collection are incomplete. Analysis and data collection are presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. Analysis and data collection for each article are presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. An adequate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and accurate discussion on the analysis and data collection for each article is presented. Outcomes and Key Findings 10.0 Outcomes and key findings for one or more articles are omitted. Overall, the outcomes and key findings are incomplete. Outcomes and key findings are presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. Outcomes and key findings for each article are presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. An adequate discussion on outcomes and key findings for each article are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and accurate discussion on the outcomes and key findings collection for each article are presented. Recommendations 10.0 Researcher recommendations are omitted for one or more of the articles. The recommendations described for three or more articles are inaccurate or incomplete. Researcher recommendations are indicated for each article. The researcher recommendations described for two of the articles are inaccurate or incomplete. Researcher recommendations for each article are presented. Researcher recommendations described for one article are inaccurate or incomplete. Researcher recommendations for each article are accurately presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Researcher recommendations are accurately and thoroughly described for each article. Explanation of How Articles Support Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal 10.0 An explanation of how the article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is omitted for one or more of the articles. The explanation for three or more articles is inaccurate or incomplete. An explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. The explanation for two of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete. A general explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. The explanation for one article is inaccurate or incomplete. Support for the evidence-based project proposal is generally evident. An explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Adequate support for the evidence-based project proposal is demonstrated. A detailed explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Support for the evidence-based project proposal is clearly evident. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0 Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWri​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​te.

Sample Solution

The Last Great Explorer GuidesorSubmit my paper for examination By Brook Wilensky-Lanford The journey to discover the Garden of Eden seems like an occupation that ought to have fallen by the wayside a long time before the nineteenth century. Never again did the whimsical medieval topographies of Prester John or Columbus take into consideration the presence of a fascinating, pristine natural heaven. This was a more up to date, smarter age. We had vanquished the wild areas of the world. What's more, Darwin's Origin of Species, distributed in 1859, was gradually demonstrating that individuals and, state, the fowls of the air, were not made at the same time in a solitary spot on the globe. Darwin himself rejected the quest for a land purpose of sources in his 1871 Descent of Man. He permitted that: "It is to some degree progressively likely that our initial ancestors lived on the African mainland than somewhere else." But, he announced, there was additionally a huge gorilla that wandered Europe in the relatively recent past, and at any rate the earth is mature enough for primate species to have moved right around it at this point. In this way, "It is pointless to estimate regarding this matter." Victoria Woodhull, women's activist radical and free-love advocate, was less discretionary in her epic discourse "The Garden of Eden," which she conveyed oftentimes during the 1870s. Eden on Earth was rubbish: "Any school kid of twelve years old who should peruse the portrayal of this nursery and not find that it has no topographical centrality whatever, should be criticized for his ineptitude." Perhaps she was alluding to the minister voyager David Livingstone, who had proclaimed, while frantic with jungle fever in 1871, that heaven existed at the wellspring of the Nile, which he made a decision to be in the Lake Bangweulu area of Zambia. Livingstone was by all account not the only one despite everything searching for Eden. This valiant modern lifestyle was flipping around time-respected convictions. Advancement was proposing that people had rose after some time from our less-canny, carnal primate sources. In any case, Christianity had been demanding for quite a long time that people had slipped, through unique sin, from close heavenly statures in the Garden of Eden to the hopeless, debased society of the late nineteenth century. What was a cutting edge, loyal individual to accept? Enter William Fairfield Warren, recognized Methodist pastor and instructor. As the leader of Boston University, he realized science would characterize what's to come. However, he was reluctant to surrender his religious philosophy to the new order. How to weave the two points of view together? Irrationally, Warren looked to Eden. He set about making an interpretation of the Bible into science: Eden was "the one spot on Earth where the natural conditions are the most great." Genesis says Eden contains "each tree that is lovely to the eye or useful for nourishment"; Warren set "widely varied vegetation of practically unheard of force and extravagance." He observed a newfound actuality: a large number of years back, Earth had been a lot hotter. He followed the revealing of phenomenal animals without a moment's delay well-known and legendary, similar to the wooly mammoth, the dinosaur, and the goliath sequoia. He knew there was as yet one clear spot on the world guide, a spot where no one had been. Furthermore, he come to the unavoidable end result: the Garden of Eden is at the North Pole. It seemed well and good, as it were. Both Eden and the Pole had frustratingly opposed endeavors to find and guarantee them, regardless of hundreds of years of risky, costly undertakings. Warren distributed this hypothesis in 1881 as Paradise Found, The Cradle of the Human Race at the North Pole. The tome emphatically smelled with scholastic power. There were long sections in French, German, and antiquated Greek in the references. He drew on his claim to fame, near folklore, which he portrayed as "the study of the most seasoned conventional convictions and recollections of humanity." He knew the incredible epic old stories of the Hindus, the Celts, the Chinese, the Persians. In the nineteenth century, this was an uncommon, recondite assortment of information, brimming with allegorical echoes of Bible stories, and goal "proof" of Christian realities. The list of "creators alluded to or cited" in Paradise Found records 580 sources—for 495 pages of content. Directly by Darwin, there is Ignatius Donnelly, who guaranteed the lost mainland of Atlantis was genuine; it was demolished by the close impact of Earth with a comet. His 1882 book Atlantis was uncontrollably well known (Donnelly had another hypothesis—that Shakespeare's plays may really be composed by Francis Bacon—yet at that point, that was considered too crazy to be in any way paid attention to). A few commentators felt that Warren's wanton reference did his contention no favors, however obviously numerous perusers were not disturbed. The second printing of Paradise Found, discharged just months after the first, was peppered with tributes. Warren composed gladly of a "plain unschooled Bible understudy," Mr. Alexander Skelton, a mechanical engineer and metal forger of Paterson, New Jersey, who had freely landed at his own "strikingly complete and apt" contention for a North Pole Eden. Warren gloated that one Professor Heer, a haughty Swiss scientist, guaranteed that Warren was copying him. He likewise distributed a tribute from the British classicist, and reliable Anglican, Archibald Henry Sayce: "Temporarily, I may state that your view appears to me famously sensible… " (regardless of that Sayce was really alluding to a prior work of Warren's, about the cosmology of Homer's Iliad). Warren's hypothesis was "quickly overriding each previous speculation" on the two sides of the Atlantic—regardless of whether Warren said so himself. In this way, it involved jumbling dissatisfaction for him that other Eden hypotheses kept on showing up. A German paleologist, Moritz Engel of Leipzig, had the nerve to distribute The Solution to the Paradise Question all the while with Paradise Found. Engel's Eden was a desert spring in the desert outside of Damascus. His four waterways were flood downpours that vanish in the dry season, come May or June. Warren retaliated: Engel's Eden was terrible. Maybe Mr. Engel had never at any point understood Genesis, with its image of plenitude and bounty! It was additionally biased, as though he never at any point saw that there were "legends of the Happy Garden" found in many other antiquated customs! To top it all off, Engel's Eden was informal, putting forth no attempt to join "the realities and speculations of ethnologists and zoologists with regards to the beginnings of human life… . The ideal opportunity for investigations of such limitation as this is past." Warren's request that the North Pole Eden was the abrogating, definitive record was genuine. Yet, it might have been a little gullible, given the mystery that Warren himself uncovered on the absolute last page of his book: he didn't really figure his heaven could be found. He composes, sorrowfully: "Tragically deceased Eden is found, yet its doors are banned against us. Presently, as toward the start of our outcast, a sword turns each approach to keep the Way of the Tree of Life… " Arriving at Polar Eden, we could sit idle "however swiftly bow in the midst of a solidified destruction and, moronic with an anonymous wonderment, let fall a couple of hot tears over the covered and destroyed hearthstone of Humanity's soonest and loveliest home." The best way to return to Eden was in death, on the off chance that we acknowledge the penance of Christ. Follow Jesus throughout everyday life, and in death you can walk directly past the cherubim with their blazing swords. Furthermore, much the same as that, regardless of his earnest attempts to be the final word on Eden, Warren had accidentally opened the entryway for a totally different age of Eden-searchers. They started to spring up very quickly, and many even refered to Warren as legitimate proof for their own cases, similarly as Warren had finished with his 580 sources. It began with Warren's own partners in the Methodist church. Reverend E. D. Ledyard declared to a group of people of 5,000 at a retreat in upstate New York that Eden was fairly nearer to home. "In Chautauqua, we see one spot where Edenic benefits have been reestablished. Christ is the focal figure here. During that time Adam heaven is being recovered." In 1890, a three-section article in the San Jose, California evening paper entitled "Nursery of Eden: Its Position on the Globe Has Been Definitely Located" clarified that California's Santa Clara Valley had all the qualities of an Eden—flawless state, immaculate atmosphere, and the goliath sequoia. On the off chance that Warren was so enthused about the sequoia, the author notes, for what reason didn't he pick California? "In coming so close to reality, it appears to be abnormal that the capable logical essayist didn't get the genuine light with regards to the area of the first home of man." Warren couldn't have been glad to discover his work lauded by Wyoming author Willis George Emerson in the introduction to his 1908 sci-fi novel The Smoky God. The book professed to be the genuine record of a Norwegian angler who in 1829 had fallen through an opening at the North Pole into the inside of the Hollow Earth—where the Garden of Eden is reachable by monorail. "In his painstakingly arranged volume, Mr. Warren nearly stubbed his toe against the genuine truth, yet missed it apparently by just a tiny bit." Dr. George C. Allen, a Boston University philologist, trusted him associate Warren that Eden was at the North Pole—yet he made one significant change. In 1921, he guaranteed that the North Pole moves altogether around the globe at regular intervals, so "cautious scientific calculations bring the first heaven where Ohio presently is." Warren himself, who passed on in 1929 at 96 years old, remained totally, outreachingly persuaded of his unique hypothesis' veracity. The North Pole Eden "has shown itself the preeminent and unavoidable speculation from the real factors of current information regarding man and the world. It has fit the most seasoned customs of religion and the most recent accomplishments of science…
PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Price Calculator

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost:

12% Discount

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments