No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Health Policy Values

Write a paper of 750-1,000 words examining the influence of your personal values and beliefs on your thoughts regarding health care policy. Include the following in your response:

Describe your personal values and spiritual beliefs.
Using the elements of cost, quality, and social issues to frame your description, discuss your beliefs and opinions about health care policy. Give examples of relevant ethical principles, supported by your values.
Analyze how factors such as your upbringing, spiritual or religious beliefs/doctrine, personal and professional experiences, and political ideology affect your current perspective on health care policy.
Examine any inconsistencies you discovered relative to the alignment of your personal values and beliefs with those concerning health policy. Discuss what insights this has given you.

Sample Solution

ld make is that as Justice Black said, "pressing public necessity" (Choper, Fallon, Kamisar, and Shiffrin, 1202) in this case justifies race specific restrictions, therefore demonstrating that the state did have a compelling interest in making Executive Order 9066. Furthermore, opponents of my view may claim that just because no one of Japanese ancestry was tried or convicted of espionage between Pearl Harbor and the internment doesn't mean spies didn't exist. Additionally, those who disagree with me would argue that although the legislative classification was over and under inclusive, it was an effective means for ensuring Japanese Americans couldn't act as spies. Thus, claiming that internment was effective and that in times of war, national security can sometimes trump the need for narrowly tailored legislative classifications. Lastly, they may argue that other ways to have prevented espionage such as loyalty hearings and closing the border would have been too costly and inconvenient. Consequently, claiming that interning people of Japanese ancestry was necessary enough. In order to refute the notion that strict scrutiny must have been applied since it was a racial classification, I would first agree that strict scrutiny should have been used, yet if it had, the Court could never have upheld Executive Order 9066. Next, there was no record during the time surrounding the internment that the FBI did not have the espionage situation already under control and therefore, the state did not have a compelling interest in making Executive order 9066. Secondly, although national security is important, it does not justify such obvious actions against someone solely because of their race. Furthermore, the state did have a legitimate interest in making the legislative classification, proving that the Court ruled Executive Order 9066 constitutional because they applied rational basis. Even if there was a compelling interest to enact the internment, the interment order never could have passed the narrowly tailored requirement of strict scrutiny. There was simply too much over and under inclusion within the interment order, to satisfy any standard of review other than rational basis. Finally, my opponents claim that interning Japanese Americans was "necessary enough" meaning rationally related, only strengthens my view that rational basis, not strict scrutiny was applied in Korematsu. In conclusion, the Court's majority opinion to uphold Executive Order 9066 and rule the interment constitutional reveals that rational basis was the standard of review truly administered. The legislative classification clearly had far too severe over and under inclusion to have passed strict scrutiny standard of review. Despite Justice Black's claim that the court used strict scrutiny, it was the presumption of constitutionality incorporated in rational basis that enabled the Court to uphold the internment of Japanese Americans. Works Cited Choper, Jesse, Richard Fallon, Yale Kamisar, and Steven Shiffrin. Constitutional Law. Tenth edition. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West, 2006. Print. 1,441 / 6 pages
PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Price Calculator

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost:

12% Discount

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments