How the music service Spotify used big data

Posted on May 12, 2022 | by Dan

Based on your reading of the case study “Is Business Ready for Wearable Computers?” on page 181 of the textbook, address the prompts below.
• Discuss at least three examples of wearable technology.
• Discuss how wearable technology could change the way the company you work for or a company you are familiar with conducts business, and provide an example.
• Discuss at least one advantage and one disadvantage to wearable technology.
• Discuss how business intelligence (BI) systems are used for reporting and data analytics.
Based on your reading of the case study “How Reliable Is Big Data?” on page 246-248 of the textbook, address the prompts below.
• Explain the term big data in your own words.
• Discuss how the music service Spotify used big data to better serve its customers.
• Discuss how New York City used big data to reduce crime rates.
• Discuss at least one ethical or security issue that big data can pose to individuals.

Sample Solution

in associations and their limits, offering arrangements where difficulties emerge. The paper expects to make inferences on the appropriateness of Fiedler's Contingency Theory of Leadership, Tuckman's Model of Group Development, Belbin's Team Theory, and Herzberg's Two Factor Theory practically speaking, and how intricacies like power and impact shape how they can be applied to best suit what is going on a pioneer faces. Authority Contingency based hypotheses of administration recommend that there is no right or most ideal way to lead a gathering, or association, because of the huge number of requirements on a circumstance (Flinsch-Rodriguez, 2019). Fiedler, in his Contingency Theory of Leadership (Fiedler, 1967), proposes that the viability of a gathering is reliant upon the authority styles of the pioneer and their favourability to the circumstance. A large part of the hypothesis is laid out around the most un-favored collaborator scale (LPC). The LPC expects to evaluate a potential chiefs way to deal with an assignment on a size of relationship persuaded to task propelled, where the pioneer fits on the scale permits what is going on to be found, and in this manner permits the ID of reasonable pioneers for undertakings. The favourableness of the circumstance relies upon three qualities: pioneer part relations, the help and trust the pioneer as from the gathering; task structure, the clearness of the assignment to the pioneer; and positional power, the power the pioneer needs to survey a gatherings execution and give prizes and disciplines (Fiedler, 1967). In the event that the pioneers approach matches what is expected from going on, achievement is anticipated for the gathering. Fiedler's possibility model offers an exceptionally stark categorisation of initiative, obviously characterizing which circumstances endlessly won't bring about progress for an expected pioneer. At the senior administration level of a hierarchal design inside an association the hypothesis can be applied unreservedly, first and foremost because of the simplicity at which people can be supplanted in the event that their LPC score doesn't match that expected of the circumstance (Pettinger, 2007). Besides, and in particular, is to guarantee that the senior administration are ideally suited to effectively lead the association. In any case, further down the order Fielder's possibility hypothesis starts to hold substantially less significance, it becomes unreasonable according to an authoritative viewpoint because of the quantity of individuals at this degree of initiative. The coordinated factors of coordinating the pioneer with their most un-favored collaborator is difficult to reliably accomplish, so a more continuum based approach is required. Figure 1: Chelladurai's Multi-Dimensional Model of Leadership (Miller and Cronin, 2012)

PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
	Single spaced
	approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost: