No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees


  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

In 2012, Psychologist Heather Butler

In 2012, Psychologist Heather Butler studied the importance that critical thinking plays in our everyday lives. “Critical thinking is not just the new buzzword in education. Critical thinking involves real outcomes that can be measured, predicted, and—perhaps for the negative life events—avoided” (Butler, 2012, p. 725).
In 2013, studies by Grossmann, Varnum, Kitayama, and Nisbett concluded that wise reasoning, rather than intelligence, was a predictor of well-being. In 2017, Dr. Butler and her colleagues, referencing the Grossmann study and based on their own research, determined that the ability to think critically was a better predictor of effective life decisions than was intelligence (Butler, Pentoney, & Bong, 2017).
Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, address the following:
• Do you agree that wisdom/critical thinking is a better predictor of well-being than intelligence? To answer, you will have to define what the following terms mean for you:
o Critical thinking
o Wisdom
o Intelligence
o Well-being
• Reflect on what you read in the text this week. Think of the people you know.
o Are the good people smart?
o Are the smart people good?
o How do you define “good”? How do you define “smart”?
o Can we use our intelligence to become “good”? If yes, how? If no, why not?

Sample Solution

principle of supremacy of EU law has never sat comfortably with the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty in the UK. “Taking back control” was a fundamental concern during the referendum campaign but the act provides little alleviation from EU supremacy. The doctrine of supremacy of EU law will have no application to laws passed on, or after exit day, however the principal of the supremacy of EU law continues to apply in some cases when altering law passed before exit day. The Act is not clear as to which forms of retained EU law this will apply to, however it can be presumed that it should apply in corresponding with the forms of EU law, such as directly effective regulations, that themselves had supremacy. It could be said that overtime the importance of EU law supremacy will fade as it will be replaced with purely domestic law which the doctrine of supremacy does not apply to. However, when considering the sheer volume of retained EU law, it becomes clear that a significant component of domestic law will be made up of retained EU law for some time, thus bringing with it the supremacy of EU law. This will alter the constitutional standing of domestic law as it becomes susceptible to the supremacy of EU law, despite Britain’s exit from the European Union. When examining the constitutional implications for the courts, a big factor is that of case law from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Before leaving the EU, all courts were bound by CJEU case law and will continue to be bound by previous decisions while having “regard to anything done on or after exit day.”. However, the key constitutional change is that retained case law will no longer be binding on the Supreme Court and the High Court of Justiciary. They will be able to depart from it by applying the same test as they would when departing form their own case law. This frees the courts of the constraints of EU case law and will result in decisions that are not influence by the CJEU – a clear constitutional change. In more general terms, the vagueness and ambiguities relating to retained EU law may prove challenging to the courts as they settle disputes that will no doubt arise around the meaning and impact of the new category of legislation. Moreover, the Withdrawal Act removes any action for state liability – the principle established in Francovich (Cases C-6 & 9-90) – meaning citizens will no longer have the ability to claim compensation as a result of UK failure to comply with EU law. This changes the constitution in a way that impacts mainly on ordinary citizens.There are some exceptions to this however. This does not apply to a situation where proceedings have begun before 29 March 2019 at 11pm or proceed

Price Calculator

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Total Cost:

12% Discount


  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us


  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments