No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees


  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Law Reform

T​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​his task will take the form of a simulated Law Reform or Parliamentary Inquiry. Choose ONE area to address ONE of the terms of reference below. You may even need to narrow to focus on ONE issue or problem that arises under this term of reference. Because this is a piece of research for a university course, you should NOT rely on citing the submissions made by others (individuals or groups) to previous law reform/ parliamentary inquiries. This is because while they are evidence of the opinion of an organisation, they are not necessarily evidence of ‘fact’. Submissions do not go through a rigorous process of peer review for legal accuracy before publication. Of course, some organisations are likely to have rigorous researchers. Others, may not and may include incorrect or outdated legal and other information. This task is different from writing an essay. Not only will you need to construct an argument, but you should also make a recommendation about what needs to be done to improve the law, and provide academic support for that recommendation. You can either critique the law and suggest that a provision or provisions need changing, or, suggest that the law is working well and does not need changing. You DO NOT need to suggest new wording of the legislation. Please read the information attached about how to structure a submission to a law reform inquiry. The biggest difference is is that you MUST set out all your recommendation/s about what should (or should not) be changed at the very beginning, just after the introductory paragraphs and before the body of your submission. If you do this, you do not need a conclusion. Please use AGLC4 referencing THE QUESTION: The past decade has seen a number of inquiries into Family Law responding to public pressure that the system is broken and needs fixing. The most noticeable concrete change that has occurred in light of these inquiries has been the merger of the Family Court and the Federal Circuit Court, now called the Federal Circuit and Family Court. Concerning the merger, the government has stated that “The overlapping family law jurisdiction between the pr​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​evious Family Court and Federal Circuit Court of Australia (FCC) led to significant inefficiencies, confusion, delays, additional costs and unequal experiences for many families. This resulted in poor outcomes for some children and families, including those affected by family violence. The new court structure will help Australian families resolve their disputes faster by improving the efficiency of the family law system, reducing the backlog of matters before the family law courts, and driving faster, cheaper and more consistent dispute resolution.” . (Simulated) Terms of Reference With the recent change of federal government, the Australian Law Reform Commission is (hypothetically) interested in the extent to which the merger goes far enough, and to what extent it has addressed the identified problems of inefficiency, confusion, delay, costs and inconsistencies. Further, the ALRC wishes to hear from the community concerning their views on recommendations from previous inquiries which might address those problems. Whilst submissions addressing any issues of efficiency, accessibility, timeliness and consistency in dispute resolution arising from the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) or its application are welcomed, the ALRC specifically welcomes submissions on the following matters (CHOOSE ONE): 1. To what extent has the merger addressed the identified problems of inefficiency, confusion, delay, costs and inconsistencies? Are further improvements needed? 2. If the family law courts were initially set up to be specialist ‘helping courts’, how might this vision continue, or be impeded, by the merger? Assuming that the current government will not roll back the merger, what else might be done? 3. What further reforms to family law or the family law system might lead to a reduction in the time taken for family law matters to be resolved, so that families who need the assistance of the court might have their matters addressed in a more timely way? 4. Are there further innovations in the areas of ADR (alternative dispute resolution) which might further enhance the appropriate, quick and cheap resolution to family law disp​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​utes?

Sample Solution

NASA says that these famous words from JFK are what gave life to the Apollo program. The 1962 speech made a promise to make it to the moon in the decade and NASA got right to work. Set in the backdrop of the cold war, the “Great Space Race” between Russia and the United States was intense, and Russia was winning. Sputnik 1 was the first man-made satellite to orbit the Earth. And, it was Russian. Four years later, Yuri Gagarin was the first person to ever be in space- Another Russian. Desperate to get on top again, the United States began the Gemini missions, which were set to practice important tasks for moon landing like space walks and orbital docking. All had been going fairly well until a simulation on the Apollo-Saturn (AS) 204 resulted in a flash fire that killed three astronauts, Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee. The accident also killed the Apollo program for 21 months. In October of 1968, the program resumed, and more tests were run to practice things like being able to actually reach the moon, to test the equipment for the landing, and even to orbit the moon without landing. In July of 1969, astronauts Neil A. Armstrong and Edwin E. Aldrin were the first humans to ever set foot on the moon. The landing was broadcast live on television due to a 7-pound camera that had been stowed away in a part of the Eagle. The camera was released to be able to capture the event by Armstrong himself who pulled a lanyard on the ladder on his way to the moon’s surface. His partner, Aldrin, then pushed a TV circuit breaker and the world was able to watch man’s first steps on the moon live. The broadcast was watched by 600 million people, which by today’s standards is 3 times higher than the Super Bowl. An impressive number even today, but in 1969 the 600 million viewers accounted for one fifth of the world: a far more impressive number that held the record for viewers for years to come. In total, 12 astronauts, all Americans, have set foot on the moon through the Apollo program. These astronauts retuned over 840 pounds of rock/dirt from the moon which have led to a deeper understanding of the moon and how it was formed. They left behind an American flag and a plaque that read “Here men from the planet Earth first set foot upon the moon. July 1969 A.D. We came in peace for all mankind.” The entire Apollo program cost the government 20.4 billion dollars. This is the same as 120 billion dollars today. The program was cancelled in 1972 for “mundane reasons such budget decisions and NASA’s research goals.” It’s a beautiful story. The United States beats Russia once and for all, accomplished our goals, and made “one giant leap for mankind.” But, is it a true story? Americans seem to be unsure. A 2001 special on Fox called Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon? Summarized and presented the evidence that the landing was all a hoax. The following information is all from that film. Top proponents of the conspiracy say that the astronauts did go to space, they just didn’t land on the moon. Instead, Armstrong and Aldrin spent 8 days just orbiting the Earth, waiting to reenter. Conspiracy theorists believe it is technically impossible to land on the moon, and they say this is why no other country has tried it. Most conspiracy theorists believe that the moon landing was actually produced and filmed in the infamous US Air Force facility, Area 51. They say that the set of the lunar landing is still standing in the facility, which is why Area 51 is so heavily guarded. The

Price Calculator

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Total Cost:

12% Discount


  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us


  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments