Superior Essay Writers | Life Experiences

Life Experiences

Provide a better understanding of the various theoretical ideologies that influence human behavior, by applying them appropriately in a personal context. It will also provide clarification into contemporary issues and social problems occurring in the world around us. Further, it will provide the foundation for future discussions and assignments that focus on prevention or solutions.

Write about your life experiences relative to the theories we have been studying. Think about and discuss the many people, places, things and experiences that have influenced you along the way and that have shaped you into who you are today.

First, before you begin to write the essay, think about and brainstorm a list of all of the possible reasons why you are the person that you have become.

Biologically (Race, age, gender, physique, agility, physical attractiveness, height, weight, health, medical history, birth order and childhood experiences)

Psychologically (Intelligence, personality, emotions, aptitudes and interests, strengths and weaknesses)

Socially:
• Ethnicity; family values, holidays and traditions, religious practices, culture, relationships with extended family members. If you were born or grew up in a different culture what were some of the cultural differences? What was it like to transition here? How do the values, expectations, traditions vary? How did your move here affect you? Social status? economic status?
• Region you grew up in; urban, rural, or suburban upbringing,
• School experiences: friendships, academics, sports, hobbies, activities
• Relationships: to other society members, significant others, children. How did these relationships influence decisions you have made?

Begin with an introduction- an overview of who you are. What effects have each of the above factors had on your life chances, your attitudes, your career choices, your values, your criminal involvement or lack of criminal involvement, your victimization? Which specific factors have been most important in influencing your life? Why? Who were your role models? How did they help you? Why were they significant? How do you handle success? How do you handle diversity? What are your education goals? What are your career goals?

Then write your paper. Be sure to answer all of the above in a thoughtful essay format (no bullets or numbers) that is logical and flows, and describes you as fully as possible. Using understanding of human development, and the three major schools of thought; biological, sociological, and psychological, integrate the theories into your essay and make the connections from the theory to your life experiences and life choices. Use your analysis to help you articulate which school(s) of thought explain you best. Why did other schools not “work for you?” Are there parts of all of the theoretical groups that explain you best? Be sure to provide sufficient discussion, examples and applications of the theoretical concepts. It is not enough to give me the summary of your life, you need to demonstrate that you understand and can apply the theoretical concepts to the things that have influenced who you have become today (see attached rubric for this assignment.

Sample Introductory Paragraph
When reflecting back on the many years of my existence, I realize that there have been so many people who have influenced and guided me. There have also been numerous experiences from which I have learned, and shaped my beliefs and values. These experiences are analogous to the three theoretical schools of thought we are studying.

Sample Solution

may be based on the Kelsenian and American models, however, all are subject to the unique political tensions of their jurisdictions. In fact, the constitutional settings of continental European countries differ so significantly, that their raison d’être range from constitutional rights protection in Germany, to monitoring devolutionary powers in Spain and balancing governmental powers in France. Under current procedures, the UKSC exhibits too many fundamental differences to its European counterparts to be termed a CC; specifically, it lacks independence from the judicial branch to act as broker of conflicts between the branches (French raison d’être) and the ability to enforce the constitution against unconstitutional legislation (German raison d’être). Yet, its similarities – constitutional statutes, ECHR application, devolved competences and application of EU law – can be deemed sufficient to allow for a detailed comparison with the European CCs in order to bring to the fore areas of reform. 1) Aspects of the UKSC layout that should be reformed, based on comparative experience Judicial appointments: election procedures; background of judges; tenure Whilst UKSC justices are subject to less politically charged selection procedures then some of its European counterparts, the nominations from the JAC have been criticised for being overtly introverted and impervious to the public sentiment. Although the objectives of the CRA, Schedule 14, signal a move towards greater separation of powers as well as selection based purely on merit and not political bias, for the UKSC to permissibly defend peoples’ basic rights against Parliament, the bench must itself have democratic legitimacy, typically achieved through appointment by elected officials or after bargaining among political parties. To prevent the SC from becoming a political tool to advance governmental objectives and “behave (…) as partisans and not as judges”, Stone suggests that the party in power should be denied a veto, justices instead being approved by a majority ruling in both houses of Parliament – this procedure is currently successfully practiced in Poland and Germany. CCs abroad typically appoint a combination of politicians, academics and ordinary judges to establish a more democratic and specialised outlook on politically and constitutionally sensitive issues. There has been some support that a reformed UKSC should also echo such a diversity in backgrounds, not le>

GET ANSWER