No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Major responsibilities of HR

One of the major responsibilities of HR is to, of course, manage human capital. This continues after employee hiring and continues through termination and succession. Having effective policies in place that define these, and other functions in between, is critical to an organization’s commitment to ethical, legal, fair, and efficient operating practices. In this assignment, you are asked to share best practices or policies on these topics during a series of brown bag sessions (these are informal lunch time presentations).

Scenario
Imagine that HR leadership is busy integrating the HR teams from both hospitals and they want to make sure department members are operating in concert with one another on a range of topics. Over the next several weeks, leadership plans to have you conduct three brown bag sessions (informal lunch-time presentations) that examine the topics of record keeping, ethics and law, and succession planning. They have asked you to write an executive summary of the content planned for each session in advance.

Session Descriptions:
Session 1: Maintaining Accurate Employee Records—In this session, you identify, and elaborate upon, four reasons for maintaining accurate and objective employee records.
Session 2: Ethical and Legal Termination—In this session, you examine the legal and ethical aspects of selecting and terminating an employee out of a group of people with similar performance, behaviors, and jobs as a part of a broad-ranging cost saving initiative. Employee differences:
One has a disability.
One is paid significantly more than others.
One is 60 years of age and older than the others.
One is planning on soon taking an extended family leave
Session 3: Succession Planning—In this session, you recommend a process to identify and groom an internal candidate to move into a senior-level leadership position in a health care organization such as CEO, COO, and CFO.
Instructions
Consider the scenario above and imagine that your audience is a group of department managers. Write an executive summary that introduces the topics in an introductory paragraph and then describes the content to be delivered in each of the three sessions in detail. Each session description should be two pages in length (six total pages plus cover page).Your work will be measured against the following criteria:

Identify, and elaborate upon, four reasons for maintaining accurate and objective employee records.
Analyze the legal implications or requirements of a termination decision. (Make sure to reference specific statutes or laws that govern this area of employment law.)
Analyze the ethical facets of a termination decision. (Make sure to reference an ethical framework to support your assertions or positions.)

Sample Solution

To start with, it is never to kill guiltless individuals in wars, upheld by Vittola's most memorable suggestion deliberately. This is generally acknowledged as 'all individuals have a right not to be killed' and assuming a fighter does, they have disregarded that right and lost their right. This is additionally upheld by "non-soldier resistance" (Frowe (2011), Page 151), which prompts the topic of warrior capability referenced later in the exposition. This is certified by the bombarding of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, finishing the Second World War, where millions were eagerly killed, just to get the point of war. Notwithstanding, some of the time regular folks are inadvertently killed through battles to accomplish their objective of harmony and security. This is upheld by Vittola, who infers proportionality again to legitimize activity: 'care should be taken where evil doesn't offset the potential advantages (Begby et al (2006b), Page 325).' This is additionally upheld by Frowe who makes sense of it is legitimate to inadvertently kill, at whatever point the soldier has full information on his activities and looks to finish his point, however it would include some significant downfalls. In any case, this doesn't conceal the reality the accidental actually killed guiltless individuals, showing shamelessness in their activities. Along these lines, it relies again upon proportionality as Thomson contends (Frowe (2011), Page 141). This prompts question of what meets all requirements to be a warrior, and whether it is legitimate to kill each other as soldiers. Soldiers are individuals who are involved straightforwardly or by implication with the conflict and it is legal to kill 'to shield the guiltless from hurt… rebuff criminals (Begby et al (2006b), Page 290).However, as referenced above regular citizen can't be hurt, showing soldiers as the main genuine focuses on, one more state of jus in bello, as 'we may not utilize the sword against the people who have not hurt us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).' furthermore, Frowe proposed warriors should be distinguished as soldiers, to keep away from the presence of hit and run combat which can wind up in a higher passing count, for instance, the Vietnam War. In addition, he contended they should be essential for the military, remain battle ready and apply to the standards of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This proposes Frowe looks for a fair, simply battle between two members staying away from non-warrior passings, yet couldn't this prompt higher demise rate for soldiers, as the two sides have generally equivalent opportunity to win since both utilize comparative strategies? By the by, seemingly Frowe will contend that warrior can legally kill one another, showing this is simply, which is likewise upheld by Vittola, who states: 'it is legitimate to draw the blade and use it against transgressors (Begby et al (2006b), Page 309).' moreover, Vittola communicates the degree of military strategies utilized, yet never arrives at a resolution regardless of whether it's legal to continue these activities, as he continually tracked down a center ground, where it very well may be legitimate to do things like this yet never consistently (Begby et al (2006b), Page 326-31). This is upheld by Frowe, who estimates the real strategies as indicated by proportionality and military need. It relies upon the size of how much harm done to each other, to pass judgment on the activities after a conflict. For instance, one can't just nuke the psychological militant gatherings all through the center east, since it isn't just relative, it will harm the entire populace, an unseen side-effect. All the more significantly, t
PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Price Calculator

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost:

12% Discount

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments