Northouse, Chapter 8 Transformational Leadership

Posted on May 13, 2022 | by Dan

For this assignment, your team will do a PowerPoint Presentation on Northouse’s Chapter 8, Transformational Leadership.

Here are the questions you should address?
• What does transformational leadership mean to you?
• What are the important points of this chapter and their significance in your transformational leadership?
• What have you learned from the chapter? Remember, we discussed the following:
 Pseudo-transformational leadership.
 Laissez-faire leadership.
 Management-by-example passive.
 Management-by-example active.
 Contingency reward.
 Transactional leadership.
 Transformational leadership.
 Charismatic leadership.
• How is transformational leadership different from your perception of leadership to this point?
• What do you like about transformational leadership or being a transformational leader? What resonates with you?
• What do you not like about transformational leadership or being a transformational leader?
• What (where) are the strengths of transformational leadership?
• What (where) are the weaknesses of transformational leadership?
• How does your leadership style relate to transformational theory? Are you a transformational leader? Why, or why not? (Hint: Reflect on the five “I”s of transformational leadership).
• How would you use/apply transformational leadership in your life (life at home, life at work, life in your community)?

Sample Solution

lescents. This is due to the high caffeine content which could lead to cardiovascular and neurological issues. Also, the high level of sugar could lead to obesity and even liver problems (Ibrahim, 2014). This is why some countries have banned energy drinks in the past or considered banning them. According to studies, Health Canada implemented rules to be followed in a bid to regulate the consumption of caffeinated energy drinks such as limiting the amount of caffeine to “180mg per single serving” and “a concentration of 400mg/ L” (Canadian Paediatric Society, 2017). A ban was also placed on marketing of CEDs to children and adolescents. Mandatory labelling that goes in accordance with the Food and Drugs Act which includes the amount of caffeine from all sources, advisories on mixing beverage with alcohol, Nutrition Fact and ingredient lists among others (Canadian Paediatric Society, 2017). Thesis Argument Utilitarian theory is based on the belief that a moral decision is based on the outcome of the action, if that action produces the most benefit and maximizes utility for the greater number of people in a population, then it is morally sound (Holland, 2015). Based on this perspective, banning of CEDs would benefit majority of people by leading to a healthier population. Energy drinks being consumed not only negatively impacts the person consuming it, but it also puts a burden on the healthcare system due to the increase in the amount of cases related to CED consumptions in hospitals. Outlawing the sale of CEDs to persons under 16 would minimize the amount of people being hospitalized as a result of consumption of these drinks and therefore, increase the utility of health care systems for everyone. Burden of emergency visits to the hospitals would reduce because according to studies hospitalizations due to energy drink consumption increased by a double between 2007 and 2011 (NCCIH, 2018). Utilitarianism perspective would support the outlawing because this would help in the reduction of hospitalization in Quebec which in turn would increase utility and benefit majority of the people. Mill’s harm principle believes power can be justly exercised over members of a community even against their will, when it is an act that will prevent harm to others (Holland, 2014). This principle would support the outlawing the consumption of Caffeinated Energy Drinks among persons younger than 16, this is due to the fact that other actions put into place to reduce consumption in the past have not been effective. There have been different measures put in place by the government in other to restrict the way these CEDs are produced and also consumed (NCCIH, 2018). The harm principle would support outlawing of Caffeinated Energy Drinks by Government of Quebec because energy drinks have a lot of side effects w

PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
	Single spaced
	approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost: