No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Organizations and relationships within the system

Assignment objectives:
• Examine the organizations and relationships within the system your sustainability focus area
• Create a systems map visual to highlight the most critical components of your system and interactions between these components
• Describe the system depicted by your map with a 1-2 page narrative

Part 1: Systems Map (24 points)
Create a systems map for the sustainability focus area you chose for the Community Sustainability Gap Analysis and Recommendation assignment. You may create the visual electronically, using the software of your choice or you may create the visual by hand and submit a high quality photo of your map.
Begin by using the required readings to gain an understanding of systems mapping. Use this exercise to further explore the topic you have chosen.
When mapping a system, you will have to determine the appropriate boundary. Use this blog to help you think through the process of drawing a boundary. Systems Thinking Scales(Links to an external site.) You are welcome to focus on the Corvallis community or to shift your focus to your local community.
You should begin mapping by creating a brainstorm cluster map (Systems Mapping (Links to an external site.)); basically jotting down everything you can think of that relates to your chosen sustainability focus area on a sheet of paper.
Refine your systems map down to highlight the most important components (organizations, individuals, stakeholders, etc.) and impacts on the surrounding community. Consider the critical organizations in your sustainability focus area and how they interact with one another. Consider impacts within all three dimensions of sustainability.
After you focus on sustainability efforts at a local level, review the Sustainable Development Goals. (Links to an external site.) Choose one or two goals that are most appropriate and show how they connect conceptually to your local system. Also use the criteria below for your systems map narrative to guide your mapping.

Part 2: Systems Map Narrative (36 points)
Objective: Explain the systems map that you created and elaborate on the important components and interactions. Use the criteria below for guidance.
These criteria are adapted from a framework created by FSG, a mission-driven consulting firm.
The systems maps that you generate for your proposal project will enable you to better:
• Understand context
• Understand connections
• Identify patterns
• Incorporate diverse perspectives
There are specific elements that we would like you to explore in each of the categories above. You must include all ‘required’ elements in your systems map narrative. You may choose which of the ‘optional’ elements to include. It will be difficult to incorporate all of this information in the systems map itself and we do not recommend that you try! Part of the process of mapping involves figuring out what information you feel is critical include in your systems map. Complete each section of the narrative in 1-2 paragraphs.

Section 1: Understand context
• Understand an issue’s landscape/context and history (e.g., key actors, organizations, initiatives, activities)
o Why has this issue been identified as an important issue in Corvallis (or another community of your choice)?
• Explore how contextual factors (e.g. social, economic, environmental) influence the system and each other
o Who has been most impacted by this issue in Corvallis (or another community of your choice)? Who is working on addressing this issue?

Section 2: Understand Connections
Required:
• Identify key actors; consider who is, has been, or should be involved
• Explore various actors’ roles in the system
o What roles are organizations already playing in identifying and implementing community level responses or solutions to the issue? Consider how your recommendation fits in to further addressing this issue.
Optional:
• Think about new connections that could be made
• How could trust be built between actors and relationships be strengthened?
• What could be accomplished with new connections and strengthened relationships
o How could additional partnerships potentially increase the impact of the response?

Section 3: Identifying patterns
Required:
• Understand how an organization is allocating its energy and resources across the system
o What specific communities is each organization serving?
• Identify key trends that may influence the system
o These trends can be Corvallis specific or more widespread.
Optional:
• Identify risks and diagnose challenges
• Identify areas of common interest, concern or excitement

Section 4: Consider Multiple Perspectives
Required:
• Explore a topic with multiple diverse perspectives in mind
o How will you ensure that you are including a diversity of voices as you design and implement your recommendation?
• Understand stakeholders’ perspectives on issues within the system and the impact of those perspectives
o How will you identify and engage relevant stakeholders?
• Consider who is, has been, or should be involved
o Are there underrepresented groups that you should make a special effort to reach out to?
Optional:
• Identify stakeholders’ priorities
• Understand stakeholders’ values, beliefs, and priorities and the impact on the system

Sample Solution

Critical criminology has gained traction in recent years, with its devotion to questioning the definitions of crime and measurements of official statistics, its critical view of agents, systems, and institutions of social control, and the connections with social justice and policy change (Carrington & Hogg, 2002). Theories of critical criminology are rooted in the structure of society, focusing on power systems and inequality. This paper will focus on labeling theory and crimes of the powerful, as they have a certain dichotomy regarding public vs. private criminality. With labeling theory, those in power have the authority to decide what is the “norm” and what is the “other,” ostracizing the “other” from the rest of society. The stigmatization of public shaming for the common citizen is carried out in all aspects of public life – the labeled individual is looked down on by family, peers, community, and employers, and it is very hard for them to shake the label (Denver et al., 2017; Kroska et al., 2016). Regarding crimes of the powerful, those in power have the privilege to escape stigmatization and consequences of illegal actions. Those in power protect their own through deciding what is illegal or not, and deciding the consequences for illegal actions. These crimes occur in private and are often underreported and under prosecuted, allowing the powerful to escape consequences. Critical analysis will address these dichotomies, challenging theoretical assumptions and criminal justice practices to advocate for structural change. Labeling Theory ​Background Labeling theory discusses the structural inequalities within society that explain criminality. It can be traced back to Mead’s theory of symbolic interactionism in 1934, which discusses the importance of language regarding informing social action through processes of constructing, interpreting, and transmitting meaning (Denver et al., 2017, p. 666). From there, labeling theory was further developed with Lemert’s distinction between primary and secondary deviance in 1951, which explained how deviance of an individual begins and continues (Thompson, 2014). Finally, and perhaps most influentially, we have Becker’s labeling theory of deviance in 1963, which is the version of the theory that will be guiding this discussion in the essay (Paternoster & Bachman, 2017). In Becker’s labeling theory, he describes crime as a social construct:
PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Price Calculator

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost:

12% Discount

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments