No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees


  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Organizations today

B: Background: answer the following questions based on research and reflections.

  • Describe the evolution of your topic as it relates to the field of I/O psych.
  • What value does your topic bring to academic research?
  • How is your topic utilized in organizations today (or how can it be used)?

C: Describe key takeaways you learned during the semester about your topic.
D: Summary conclusions and recommendations

  • what do you recommend for researchers to expand or explore further pertaining to your topic?

Sample Solution

One might also argue that the reader is not inclined to accept Nabokov’s monstrous male hero as they are aware of the damage to Lolita’s childhood, and instead feel a sense of shame and disgust towards his narrator as a result of their protective stances concerning the child. Throughout the text, Humbert refers to her through nicknames, such as ‘Lo’, ‘Lola’, ‘Dolly’, clearly showing the theft of her identity, and as a result the reader is never exposed to Lolita’s true character. This is aided by the objectification of the child to an aesthetic object, ‘a salutary storm of sobs’, which dehumanises Lolita and prohibits the narrator from becoming aware of the extent of the damage he has inflicted on her. The use of the sibilant phrase furthers the idea of Lolita as having an elusive nature, as her identity slips away from her as a consequence of her suffering. Additionally, the reader is exceedingly aware of Humbert’s manipulative and terrorising approach to the child, with Nabokov’s use of the controlling line ‘let us suppose they believe you’ taking a condescending tone to make clear to the reader Lolita’s entrapment within her situation. This is enhanced with the repeated rhetorical questions, ‘But what happens to you, my orphan?’ which reveal the manipulating and devious portrayal of the monstrous narrator. References to Lolita’s upset and horror also cause the reader to sympathise with her in place of accepting Humbert, and Nabokov cultivates a sense of hopelessness and desperation with the simple phrases, ‘again I hear you crying’, ‘in the middle of the night she came sobbing’. He uses the setting of darkness to indicate Lolita’s lack of comfort and danger, characterising her as innocent in her manipulation and creating the desire amongst the readers to protect and comfort the lonely child, implying that the Nabokov only intends for Lolita to be accepted. Alternatively, it could be said that Lolita is characterised as manipulative and deceitful, signifying that she is compliant in their sexual relationship. Within Humbert’s narrative, he characterises her as ‘cruel’, ‘crafty’ and ‘calculating’, using the alliterative adjectives to reflect the harsh and brutal nature of Lolita towards her protector. Nabokov also suggests that Lolita does gain some power through taking advantage of the narrator’s desire for her, implying that she is aware of and exploits her sexual appeal, shown through the addressing of Humbert as ‘dad’ throughout the text. Further, her confrontational and argumentative character is evidenced to reflect her strength, ‘I ought to call the police and tell them that you raped me’, however this phrase ultimately has a poignant effect on the reader, making it clear that she is aware of her suffering and hopelessness. As a result, while Nabokov suggests that Lolita attempts to take back some power against her abuser, the reader can fundamentally only sympathise with her pain, supporting the inability to accept the monstrous protagonist. To conclude, it is evident that, though Nabokov does encourage the reader to accept his monstrous male hero, this is only to emphasise the tragic and catastrophic consequences of his text and warn against such manipulative behaviour. While Humbert’s use of elaborate language, addresses to the reader and elusive portrayal do indeed result in his readership accepting and identifying with the horrifically manipulative character, they are unable to ignore the contradiction within his narrative and ultimately sympathise with Lolita. Metcalf concludes that ‘We are clearly meant to regard Humbert as a moral abomination’ , acknowledging that the unimaginably monstrous actions of Nabokov’s narrato

Price Calculator

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Total Cost:

12% Discount


  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us


  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments