No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Private Equity (PE)

Posted on | by Dan
  1. (20%) Briefly discuss Private Equity (PE) in your own words and provide an example. Also, discuss the status of the PE market today What is the first thing to look at when selecting a company to fund and why? This should be at least 2 pages doubled spaced. Provide source links.
  2. (30%) CASE: Value Early-Stage Financing (Posted on Blackboard Week 2) company factors that go into place. In your own words discuss the Value Early-Stage Company Financing Case using the following topics: Try to relate this case and topics based on the current US economy and markets. (at least a paragraph for each part)

a. Briefly discuss the importance of Early-Stage Financing in the case providing a pro and con.
b. Free Cash Flows (FCF)
c. Terminal Value (TV)
d. NPV/DCF
e. Option Pools
f. Shares and Price
g. Multiple Rounds Financing

  1. (20%) Select a sector and company (small cap to mid-cap or so, $25B or less), and/or company that specializes in one or products or services. Provide past financials and transactions and analysis of the industry, sector, and company. Gather and provide Financials (Income statement, Balance Sheet, and Cash Flows) Select some important ratios that matter for your company and industry analysis. Discuss Benchmarking and trend analysis using the nearest competitive and/or industry. (About two pages)
  2. (30%) As a Private Equity Analyst, you can use the same company in problem 3. If not using the same company, you may simulate a hypothetical company and numbers The following are topics from finance course that you should have taken prior to this course. In any case we reviewed the topics. The only difference is now you are looking to value and how to fund the small company. For now, you can use a public company as an example as they do have financials available. Target, look past and forward at least 3-5 years for cash flows, determine WACC your required rate of return, terminal value and NPV, capital structure and decide what you should offer for the company and why? Briefly discuss the steps you go through for the target company and the outcome. Determine the a. NPV OR b. APV OR c. Venture Capital Method (VC) for a company value and what you want to offer and why? (You may do 2 or more parts for extra credit).

Sample Solution

here must be war for the sake of peace (Aristotle (1996), Page 187). However, Frowe argues “self-defence” has a plurality of descriptions, seen in Chapter 1, showing that self-defence cannot always justify one’s actions. Even more problematic, is the case of self-defence in war, where two conflicting views are established: The Collectivists, a whole new theory and the Individualists, the continuation of the domestic theory of self-defence (Frowe (2011), Page 9& 29-34). More importantly, Frowe refutes Vittola’s view on vengeance because firstly it empowers the punisher’s authority, but also today’s world prevents this action between countries through legal bodies like the UN, since we have modernised into a relatively peaceful society (Frowe (2011), Page 80-1). Most importantly, Frowe further refutes Vittola through his claim that ‘right intention cannot be used as an excuse to wage war in response to anticipated wrong,’ suggesting we cannot just harm another just because they have done something unjust. Other factors need to be considered, for example, Proportionality. Thirdly, Vittola argues that war should be avoided (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332) and that we should proceed circumstances diplomatically. This is supported by the “last resort” stance in Frowe, where war should not be permitted unless all measures to seek diplomacy fails (Frowe (2011), Page 62). This means war shouldn’t be declared until one party has no choice but to declare war, in order to protect its territory and rights, the aim of war. However, we can also argue that the war can never be the last resort, given there is always a way to try to avoid it, like sanctions or appeasement, showing Vittola’s theory is flawed. Fourthly, Vittola questions upon whose authority can demand a declaration of war, where he implies any commonwealth can go to war, but more importantly, “the prince” where he has “the natural order” according to Augustine, and all authority is given to him. This is further supported by Aristotle’s Politics ((1996), Page 28): ‘a king is the natural superior of his subjects.’ However, he does later emphasise to put all faith in the prince is wrong and has consequences; a thorough examination of the cause of war is required along with the willingness to negotiate rival party (Begby et al (2006b), Page 312& 318). This is supported by the actions of Hitler are deemed unjustly. Also, in today’s world, wars are no longer fought only by states but also non-state actors like Al-Queda and ISIS, showing Vittola’s normative claim on authority is outdated. This is further supported by Frowe’s claim that the leader needs to represent the people’s interests, under legitimate authority, which links on to the fourth condition: Public declaration of war. Agreed with many, there must be an official announcement on a declaration of war (Frowe (2011), Page 59-60&63).
PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Price Calculator

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost:

12% Discount

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments