Problem affecting a community

Posted on April 24, 2022 | by Dan

Define a problem affecting a community that you belong to and research the causes of that
problem. Then, propose a specific solution, taking care to define the parameters of your proposal and
explain how it can be implemented. Finally, defend your proposal by discussing how it will address the
problem and outlining any additional potential benefits. Your proposal should:
• Provide adequate background information regarding the problem you intend to solve. This may
include a description of the problem, a discussion of what makes the problem significant, and an
enumeration of some of the solutions already proposed by others.
• Propose your own solution in a clear thesis statement.
• Discuss how your solution will be implemented.
• Provide support for your proposal by explaining how it will alleviate the problem and by
enumerating any additional benefits.
• Account for and respond to possible objections.
• Conclude by summarizing your proposal, discussing its significance, and offering a powerful
emotional appeal.

Sample Solution

nnect to rehearse in associations and their impediments, offering arrangements where difficulties emerge. The paper means to make inferences on the reasonableness of Fiedler's Contingency Theory of Leadership, Tuckman's Model of Group Development, Belbin's Team Theory, and Herzberg's Two Factor Theory practically speaking, and how intricacies like power and impact shape how they can be applied to best suit what is going on a pioneer faces. Administration Contingency based hypotheses of authority recommend that there is no right or most ideal way to lead a gathering, or association, because of the critical number of requirements on a circumstance (Flinsch-Rodriguez, 2019). Fiedler, in his Contingency Theory of Leadership (Fiedler, 1967), recommends that the viability of a gathering is reliant upon the authority styles of the pioneer and their favourability to everything going on. A significant part of the hypothesis is laid out around the most un-favored colleague scale (LPC). The LPC means to evaluate a potential chiefs way to deal with an assignment on a size of relationship propelled to task spurred, where the pioneer fits on the scale permits what is going on to be reasoned, and accordingly permits the distinguishing proof of appropriate pioneers for undertakings. The favourableness of everything going on relies upon three attributes: pioneer part relations, the help and trust the pioneer as from the gathering; task structure, the clearness of the undertaking to the pioneer; and positional power, the power the pioneer needs to survey a gatherings execution and give prizes and disciplines (Fiedler, 1967). On the off chance that the pioneers approach matches what is expected from going on, achievement is anticipated for the gathering. Fiedler's possibility model offers an extremely somber categorisation of initiative, obviously characterizing which circumstances endlessly won't bring about progress for a likely pioneer. At the senior administration level of a hierarchal design inside an association the hypothesis can be applied openly, first and foremost because of the simplicity at which people can be supplanted on the off chance that their LPC score doesn't match that expected of everything going on (Pettinger, 2007). Also, and above all, is to guarantee that the senior administration are ideally suited to effectively lead the association. Notwithstanding, further down the order Fielder's possibility hypothesis starts to hold considerably less pertinence, it becomes unrealistic according to an authoritative point of view because of the quantity of individuals at this degree of administration. The coordinated operations of coordinating the pioneer with their most un-favored collaborator is difficult to reliably accomplish, so a more continuum based approach is required. Figure 1: Chelladurai's Multi-Dimensional Model of Leadership (Miller and Cronin, 2012) There are other possibility hypotheses that give a more continuum based approach like Redding's hypothesis of initiative and the board, but Fielder's portrayal of how situational factors influence the authority style expected for everything going on is very valuable in grasping the essentials of administration (Pettinger, 2007). Chelladurai in his Multi Dimensional Model of Leadership, develops muc

PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
	Single spaced
	approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost: