No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees


  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Prosecutors are abusing the use of plea bargains to bypass the Sixth Amendment’s right

Are prosecutors misleading the public when they claim a 90% conviction rate???

Prosecutors are abusing the use of plea bargains to bypass the Sixth Amendment’s right to confront witnesses, while inflating their conviction rates.
Prosecutors are not abusing the use of plea bargains or violating the Sixth Amendment as a means of increasing their conviction rates.
Support your position by (1) referencing scholarly sources (LexisNexis law review articles or academic scholarly articles from LIRN) and (2) referencing one current news event (less than five years old).
Draft a response that adheres to this four-paragraph essay format:
Introduction (brief introduction of your argument and support).
Summary of scholarly articles and how its findings support your argument.
Summary of current news event (less than three years old) and a thorough analysis on how it supports the arguments drafted in the previous paragraph.

Sample Solution

e prevented further atrocities. Also, even with the benefit of hindsight, most criticisms of any humanitarian interventions fail to justify non-intervention. one example is in the case of Rwanda and we see clearly the consequences of Western powers failing to impose the necessary diplomatic, political and military force. A counter-argument to the notion that the intervention was a failure derives from the fact that the crimes committed in Sirte pale in comparison to those that we would have expected had Ghaddafi overrun Benghazi. Although this is an assumptive statement which by definition is impossible to prove, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper issued a statement in 2011 regarding the Libyan conflicts: “one either believes in freedom, or one just says one believes in freedom. The Libyan people have shown by their sacrifice that they believe in it. Assisting them is a moral obligation upon those who profess this great ideal” (Mueller, 2015, p. 32) In this respect, Harper’s views were upheld, and the intervention did provide the Libyan people with the appropriate support system to tackle a genuine threat to their individual liberties and human rights. It can also be argued that Western states have greater legitimacy for state building enterprises than developing states as Western democracy have an established human rights ethos and stable liberal societies. Whilst it is true that the intervention failed in creating a peaceful and democratic Libya, that was not the original target for NATO forces. The goal was to provide protection for civilians and prevent atrocities similar to those evident in Rwanda. I would argue that this would be a more realistic lens in assessing the failure of the Libyan humanitarian intervention. This can be done through a comparison between what Libya looks like today, as opposed to how it would look had Gadhafi’s forces had been allowed to reign terror across Libya. As the United Nations Security Council approved intervention in Libya, they stated that the goal of the intervention was “to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack” (NATO, 2011) and arguably, this was achieved. President Obama acknowledged in an interview with Thomas Friedman that “had we not intervened, it’s likely that Libya would be Syria. … And so there would be more death, more disruption, more destruction.” (Friedman, 2014) Conclusion Milne (2011) concluded that in the case of the Libyan intervention, NATO failed to protect the civilian population in Libya. He also notes that NATO, in fact, multiplied the number of civilian deaths through air strikes, whilst losing not a single soldier of its own. I would argue that the Libyan intervention allowed the Western powers to assert themselves in the heart of a strategically sensitive region in the world. However, the long-term implications of intervention were not addressed, and no post-conflict resolution of any form was proposed. This is where I would conclude and state the intervention was primarily a failure, rather than a success. A more holistic approach to the crisis shou

Price Calculator

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Total Cost:

12% Discount


  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us


  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments