No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees


  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

The effectiveness of each strategy in resolving a team’s problem.

Companies operating globally often use cross-functional teams

Companies operating globally often use cross-functional teams to achieve the company’s business objectives. To accomplish these, cross-functional teams need to collaborate effectively. There are various strategies that teams can use to achieve highly effective performance.

Use this template to complete the assignment: Unit 2 Template.

Create a PowerPoint Presentation on a collaboration strategy for an organization. Cover the following:

Introduce the audience to different cross-functional team collaboration strategies.
Discuss how a cross-functional team collaboration strategy might help the organization achieve a defined objective.
Describe the effectiveness of each strategy in resolving a team’s problem.

Sample Solution

the coercive apparatus (or military) to break with the regime and instead fight for the revolution. This was due to the lack of oil wealth in said countries as well as non-fluid transfer of hereditary power within the regimes. In Syria, Bahrain, and Libya, the regime used oil wealth and hereditary rule to use their coercive apparatus in the face of mass uprisings to silence them. We only see a change in the regime of Libya due to the intervention of foreign powers to defeat Gaddafi. What separates the successful versus failed uprisings is the historical structure of the regime-military relations defined by oil wealth and hereditary rule, where the incumbent of failed uprisings enjoyed loyalty of such officers to turn on their own people in the name of the regime and the incumbent of successful regime change had failed loyalty within their coercive apparatus. The opposition to autocratic regimes in the Arab world that saw success were from oil poor and non-hereditary regimes, whom were able to be toppled through the change in their coercive apparatus. In these scenarios, the coercive apparatus had not united behind the ruler due to non-successful hereditary transfer of power and the regime began lacking lucrative rent to purchase military loyalty, therefore the combination created a structural opportunity for the opposition to overthrow the regime. In Tunisia, Ben Ali struggled with his despotic power as his military abandoned him due to the lack of fusion to the regime through rent or dynasticism. Due to this, academics and legal advocates bolstered the movement to overthrow the regime with a mass social media movement. As the military turned on the regime, Ben Ali fled the country and is currently residing in Saudi Arabia. Tunisia is the only example where the military completely turned on the regime quickly, and since then the country has not been able to find a common medium to begin the democratization process. Unemployment rates and economic conditions have tumbled since the uprising as the new government is scrambling to democratize without any baseboard to start with. In Yemen, there was a similar scenario. Following the revolt in Tunisia, the Yemenis hoped to recreate a regime collapse. As Yemen is not very wealthy and doesn’t have hereditary rule, the regime had little coercive control over their military. Through violent clashes between protesters and the regime, the military began to split in half. After an assassination attempt, the UN and Saudi Arabia forced Saleh to step down as Saleh could not command loyalty from his people. Saleh’s inability to gain consistent loyalty roots back to the regimes instability between rulers as well as their lack of wealth for the regime to pay rent to its military and people, therefore not being able to gain their support. Although Egypt had a similar success in their uprising, there are more factors that play into the success of the opposition. Egypt has long defined its citizens role in society and relation to state through their labor, as their only labor union (ETUF) is a state controlled entity that coops labor activists in return for social and welfare benefits. The upsurge of labor action in Egypt began 10 years before the revolt due to the degradation of living conditions. The regime had continuously bribed its laborers with free transportation, medical care, increased pay, etc, however it began to falter due to its widening lack of funds to pay off their “rent”. Workers began to stop receiving benefits and Egyptians demanded

Price Calculator

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Total Cost:

12% Discount


  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us


  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments