No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees


  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Unlimited attempts to pass a skill

“I just flunked my third chance at passing my clinical skills test going into my third semester of nursing school. I am so humiliated. Now I have to withdraw from the program entirely and re-apply, which sets me back a year. I am a good student…I passed all previous skills evaluations, pass clinicals, make at least “B” on classroom work and even scored a 93 on the most recent HESI. I am also a bit angry since I felt I wasn’t given a good environment to pass this final, critical checkoff – missing several items of equipment, the instructor dropped a glass of water during my checkoff and cut me off several times during my explanations. I am so demoralized.”

Evaluation of students is a difficult part of being a faculty member. Skills lab check offs are stressful for both students and faculty, and the outcome is sometimes devastating. In your initial post, consider your thoughts about skills check offs from an instructor’s perspective. Consider such things as:

Should students be allowed unlimited attempts to pass a skill? Why or why not?
Given that this is high stakes testing, what responsibility does the faculty have to create a positive testing environment? What would that look like?
Will you be able to fail a student if necessary? Instructors who struggle with this may pass students on to the next course/instructor, which may have significant legal and ethical ramifications.
Students often believe that faculty are trying to “weed out” students. Do you think that is true?
Finally, how has being a practicing nurse changed your perspective on evaluation of students in nursing school?

Sample Solution

structure with reliably adjusted MCMAT prompts the littlest region cost and less defer time. 1.3Objective: ' Design of shortened different steady Multiplication/Accumulation unit ' Implementation of multiplier utilizing Dadda and Wallace tree calculations ' Achieve rapid and better asset use CHAPTER-2 Literature Survey 2.1 Truncated multipliers In the conversation to follow, it is expected that an unsigned n-digit multiplicand An is duplicated by an unsigned n-cycle multiplier B to create an unsigned 2n-piece item P. For fragmentary numbers, the qualities for A, B, and P are The duplication framework for P = A B is displayed in Figure 1a. For most fast applications, equal multipliers are utilized to create the item. In numerous PC frameworks, the 2n-piece items delivered by the equal multipliers are adjusted to n pieces to keep away from development in word size. As introduced in [23] - [26], shortened duplication gives a productive strategy to decreasing the equipment necessities of adjusted equal multipliers. With shortened duplication, just the n + k most huge sections of the augmentation framework are utilized to register the item. The blunder delivered by precluding the n , k least critical sections and adjusting the eventual outcome to n pieces is assessed, and this gauge is added with the n + k most huge segments to create the adjusted item. Albeit this prompts extra mistake in the adjusted item, different strategies have been created to assist with restricting this blunder. With the Constant Correction Truncated Multiplier introduced in [24], a consistent is added to sections n , 1 to n , k of the duplication lattice. The consistent makes up for the blunder presented by precluding the n , k least signi cant sections (called decrease mistake), and the blunder because of adjusting the item to n bits (called adjusting blunder). The normal worth of the amount of these mistake E complete is registered by accepting that each piece in A, B and P has an equivalent likelihood of being one or zero. As depicted in [24], this gives (2) The steady Ctotal is gotten by adjusting ,Etotal to n + k partial pieces, to such an extent that (3) where round(x) demonstrates that x is adjusted to the closest number. The duplication network for a shortened multiplier that utilizes this strategy is displayed in Figure 1b. In [26], the Variable Correction Truncated Multiplier is presented. With this sort of multiplier, the upsides of the halfway item bits in segment n , k , 1 are utilized to assess the mistake because of leaving o the n , k least signi cant sections. This is achieved by adding the halfway items bits in section n , k , 1 to segment n , k. To make up for the adjusting mistake that happens while shortening the items bits in sections n , 1 to n , k, an adjusting steady, Cround, is added to the duplication lattice. Since every item chomped has an equivalent likelihood of being one or zero and the adjusting steady can't go past section n , k, the worth utilized for Round is (4) Which relates to the added substance converse of the normal worth of the adjusting blunder, shortened after segment n , k. The revision consistent is added by placing ones in segments n , 2 to n , k, Truncated Multi-pincers have less normal, mean square and most extreme blunder for given upsides of n and k, however require more equipment. As talked about in , exhibit multipliers can be carried out more productively as Vari-capable Correction Truncated Multipliers and tree multipliers can be executed all the more effectively as Constant Correction Truncated Multipliers.

Price Calculator

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Total Cost:

12% Discount


  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us


  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments