Volkswagen scandal

Posted on June 23, 2022 | by Dan

“Why should I care about the shareholders, who I see once a year at the general meeting. It is much more important that I care about the employees; I see them every day.” – Attributed to the CEO of Volkswagen in 1983.

In 2015, it became apparent that the car maker, Volkswagen, had for years been using illegal software installed in 11 million of its cars worldwide to help the company satisfy emissions standards required by US state testing agencies. When news of this broke, the company faced a global backlash.

Can some blame for this deceit be directed towards the company’s governance structure? Based on your analysis of the crisis, explain whether you think suitable steps have been taken to prevent future scandals of this type.
Notes: The Individual Essay calls on students to investigate a corporate crisis, and whether governance contributed the organisation’s culpability. Students also need to assess the organisation’s response.
Emphasis is placed on careful background study.

Sample Solution

John Searle's popular "Chinese Room" contention that was talked about in Chapter 2 of How the Mind Works, was one of the most fascinating contentions to show cases of man-made reasoning. Essentially the case as that PCs would be able and will basically attempt to dominate the demonstration of reasoning. The contention depended on how Searle sees himself in a room alone and is attempting to follow and jump aboard with a PC that will be that is answering Chinese characters. Be that as it may, Searle realizes he can't get a handle on or see any of it, yet he endeavors to control numbers and different images to deceive those beyond the room. His control of such numbers and images, produces Chinese characters, which permits him to persuade those external the room that there is somebody who can really speak Chinese inside the room. Searle accepts that however the PC seems to comprehend what is happening, in all reality it really doesn't figure out it. It tends to be inferred that reason for this contention was the invalidate the point that a PC can work all alone. That's what searle trusts in the event that a man can't comprehend Chinese in any event, when he was controlling numbers and images, then, at that point, neither can PCs. A PC is no human and can never be like one. Pinker's reaction to the "Chinese room" contention is hesitant. He says that Searle has expressed nothing to do with something that can be logically significant. Also, that Searle is just expressing about "comprehend". As a matter of fact, it is discussed in abroad way, which isn't excessively clear or compact. Pinker says that people are loaded up with meat, while PCs are loaded up with data. People need the right fastens to be pushed before he/she can precisely deal with data. Additionally, PCs need the right data while handling in look for other data. Both need some kind of push to find lasting success and without that push people and PCs both can't work and "comprehend". Pinker feels that we can be similarly as untrustworthy as c

PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
	Single spaced
	approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost: