No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees


  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Why murder suicide is so common in domestic violence situations

Use following links to answer questions:
Discussion 2 Questions:

  1. After reviewing the discussion resources, list three things you learned from them (or consider important) and
    explain why each one is important.
  2. What is your opinion about a fatality review team approach?
  3. Why do you think murder suicide is so common in domestic violence situations? Explain.
  4. Based on the theoretical profiles in Chapter 4, what do you think is the most valid theory to explain domestic
    violence AND describe/analyze its relationship to risk and response? Be sure to explain why.
  5. Do you think domestic violence calls are dangerous to police officers? Support your opinion.
    o If so, list three factors that make it dangerous and explain why.
    o Is domestic violence dangerous to the community?
  6. Call to Action: One important step in confronting domestic violence is dispelling myths and false beliefs
    about it. In that spirit, share with someone at least one thing you have learned in this class. While only one
    small step in confronting this problem, it can make a difference.

    o Based on what you have learned so far in this class, what is the ONE thing you would share with others
    about domestic violence. Why?
  7. Hot Off the Press: Many of you may have seen this ASU email profiling a digital planning tool related to
    domestic violence. (Review article 1 attached.)

    o What is your opinion of this new tool?
    o List at least one advantage and one disadvantage.
    o Do you think it can reduce risk to the victim? Explain.

Sample Solution

Critical criminology has gained traction in recent years, with its devotion to questioning the definitions of crime and measurements of official statistics, its critical view of agents, systems, and institutions of social control, and the connections with social justice and policy change (Carrington & Hogg, 2002). Theories of critical criminology are rooted in the structure of society, focusing on power systems and inequality. This paper will focus on labeling theory and crimes of the powerful, as they have a certain dichotomy regarding public vs. private criminality. With labeling theory, those in power have the authority to decide what is the “norm” and what is the “other,” ostracizing the “other” from the rest of society. The stigmatization of public shaming for the common citizen is carried out in all aspects of public life – the labeled individual is looked down on by family, peers, community, and employers, and it is very hard for them to shake the label (Denver et al., 2017; Kroska et al., 2016). Regarding crimes of the powerful, those in power have the privilege to escape stigmatization and consequences of illegal actions. Those in power protect their own through deciding what is illegal or not, and deciding the consequences for illegal actions. These crimes occur in private and are often underreported and under prosecuted, allowing the powerful to escape consequences. Critical analysis will address these dichotomies, challenging theoretical assumptions and criminal justice practices to advocate for structural change. Labeling Theory ​Background Labeling theory discusses the structural inequalities within society that explain criminality. It can be traced back to Mead’s theory of symbolic interactionism in 1934, which discusses the importance of language regarding informing social action through processes of constructing, interpreting, and transmitting meaning (Denver et al., 2017, p. 666). From there, labeling theory was further developed with Lemert’s distinction between primary and secondary deviance in 1951, which explained how deviance of an individual begins and continues (Thompson, 2014). Finally, and perhaps most influentially, we have Becker’s labeling theory of deviance in 1963, which is the version of the theory that will be guiding this discussion in the essay (Paternoster & Bachman, 2017). In Becker’s labeling theory, he describes crime as a social construct:

Price Calculator

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Total Cost:

12% Discount


  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us


  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments